Consistent notation for presenting complex optimization models in technical writing

Michael D. Teter , Alexandra M. Newman , Martin Weiss
{"title":"Consistent notation for presenting complex optimization models in technical writing","authors":"Michael D. Teter ,&nbsp;Alexandra M. Newman ,&nbsp;Martin Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.sorms.2016.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With an increase in computational power, and with recent advances in software, practitioners are formulating ever more complicated optimization models, many of which are drawn from interdisciplinary applications and are designed to reflect the details of real-world systems. While such models have proven useful in providing implementable solutions with a verified impact, they are also more cumbersome to document in a clear and concise manner. In this paper, we recommend: (i) conventions for defining sets, parameters, and variables, (ii) ways of presenting the objective and constraints, and (iii) means by which to organize formulations. While other conventions may be perfectly acceptable, we suggest one set of guidelines for graduate students, academics, and practitioners in need of clearly and easily presenting a large, complex optimization model. Self-study and/or the introduction of these principles into an applied, advanced graduate class can remove ambiguity from model formulations and improve the communication between modelers and their intended audience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101192,"journal":{"name":"Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sorms.2016.05.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876735416300186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

With an increase in computational power, and with recent advances in software, practitioners are formulating ever more complicated optimization models, many of which are drawn from interdisciplinary applications and are designed to reflect the details of real-world systems. While such models have proven useful in providing implementable solutions with a verified impact, they are also more cumbersome to document in a clear and concise manner. In this paper, we recommend: (i) conventions for defining sets, parameters, and variables, (ii) ways of presenting the objective and constraints, and (iii) means by which to organize formulations. While other conventions may be perfectly acceptable, we suggest one set of guidelines for graduate students, academics, and practitioners in need of clearly and easily presenting a large, complex optimization model. Self-study and/or the introduction of these principles into an applied, advanced graduate class can remove ambiguity from model formulations and improve the communication between modelers and their intended audience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在技术写作中表示复杂优化模型的一致符号
随着计算能力的提高,以及软件的最新进展,实践者正在制定更复杂的优化模型,其中许多是从跨学科应用中提取的,旨在反映现实世界系统的细节。虽然这些模型在提供具有验证影响的可实现解决方案方面已被证明是有用的,但以清晰和简洁的方式记录它们也比较麻烦。在本文中,我们推荐:(i)定义集合、参数和变量的惯例,(ii)呈现目标和约束的方法,以及(iii)组织公式的方法。虽然其他惯例可能完全可以接受,但我们建议为研究生、学者和需要清晰、轻松地呈现大型复杂优化模型的实践者提供一套指导方针。自学和/或将这些原则引入到应用中,高级研究生课程可以消除模型公式中的模糊性,并改善建模者与目标受众之间的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of a Process for Subjective Probability Elicitation Mathematical Models for Evolving Natural Gas Markets Quantitative Risk Analysis of Air Pollution Health Effects Preface to 4th edition Preface to 3rd edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1