A Multicenter Evaluation of the Quality Management Practices for Point-of-Care Testing in Nigeria

I. Nnakenyi, C. Onyenekwu, L. Imoh, N. Ntuen, I. Mohammed, C. Nlemadim
{"title":"A Multicenter Evaluation of the Quality Management Practices for Point-of-Care Testing in Nigeria","authors":"I. Nnakenyi, C. Onyenekwu, L. Imoh, N. Ntuen, I. Mohammed, C. Nlemadim","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The need for timely patient management has led to the proliferation of point-of-care testing (POCT) within health care facilities. However, POCT is often implemented without supervision by laboratory personnel, which raises concern about the quality of its results. The aim of this study was to determine the quality management practices for POCT in several Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Materials and Method This was a descriptive study of 61 POCT sites at 5 tertiary hospitals across Nigeria. Research laboratories and self-monitoring POCT were excluded. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires, as well as visual inspection of records and facilities. Results were presented as counts and percentages. Results The predominant POCT was the glucometer (65%). Cost of testing was majorly 0 to 500 naira (<2 US dollars; 78%). Point-of-care testing sites were majorly operated by physicians 40%, and only 26% of the sites had documentation of training on the POCT before use. Method validation was not performed in 81% of the sites. Internal quality control and external quality assessment were performed at 26% and 10% of the sites, respectively. There was no traceability of results on the device to the patients tested at 78% of the sites. Troubleshooting a faulty device was performed by nonlaboratorians at 77% of the sites. Most sites did not involve the laboratory in device procurement (74%), validation (77%), maintenance (78%), troubleshooting (64%), or monitoring the accuracy of the results (74%). None of the hospitals had a POCT committee. Discussion The practice of quality management for POCT in tertiary hospitals was poor because of inadequately trained operators and noninvolvement of the laboratory. Laboratory staff should provide guidance and a framework for POCT implementation to ensure quality results and patient safety.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"173–176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction The need for timely patient management has led to the proliferation of point-of-care testing (POCT) within health care facilities. However, POCT is often implemented without supervision by laboratory personnel, which raises concern about the quality of its results. The aim of this study was to determine the quality management practices for POCT in several Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Materials and Method This was a descriptive study of 61 POCT sites at 5 tertiary hospitals across Nigeria. Research laboratories and self-monitoring POCT were excluded. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires, as well as visual inspection of records and facilities. Results were presented as counts and percentages. Results The predominant POCT was the glucometer (65%). Cost of testing was majorly 0 to 500 naira (<2 US dollars; 78%). Point-of-care testing sites were majorly operated by physicians 40%, and only 26% of the sites had documentation of training on the POCT before use. Method validation was not performed in 81% of the sites. Internal quality control and external quality assessment were performed at 26% and 10% of the sites, respectively. There was no traceability of results on the device to the patients tested at 78% of the sites. Troubleshooting a faulty device was performed by nonlaboratorians at 77% of the sites. Most sites did not involve the laboratory in device procurement (74%), validation (77%), maintenance (78%), troubleshooting (64%), or monitoring the accuracy of the results (74%). None of the hospitals had a POCT committee. Discussion The practice of quality management for POCT in tertiary hospitals was poor because of inadequately trained operators and noninvolvement of the laboratory. Laboratory staff should provide guidance and a framework for POCT implementation to ensure quality results and patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心评价的质量管理实践的护理点测试在尼日利亚
对患者及时管理的需求导致了卫生保健机构内护理点检测(POCT)的普及。然而,POCT通常在没有实验室人员监督的情况下实施,这引起了对其结果质量的担忧。本研究的目的是确定尼日利亚几家三级医院POCT的质量管理实践。材料和方法本研究对尼日利亚5家三级医院的61个POCT站点进行了描述性研究。排除研究实验室和自我监测POCT。数据是通过访谈者填写的问卷以及对记录和设施的目视检查来收集的。结果以计数和百分比表示。结果主要POCT为血糖仪(65%)。检测费用主要为0 - 500奈拉(<2美元;78%)。40%的测试点主要由医生操作,只有26%的测试点在使用POCT前有培训文件。81%的地点未进行方法验证。内部质量控制和外部质量评估分别在26%和10%的站点进行。在78%的检测地点,设备上的检测结果无法追踪到患者。故障设备的故障排除是由非实验室人员在77%的站点进行的。大多数场所在设备采购(74%)、验证(77%)、维护(78%)、故障排除(64%)或监测结果准确性(74%)中没有让实验室参与。没有一家医院有POCT委员会。三级医院POCT质量管理实践较差,原因是操作人员培训不足,实验室不参与。实验室工作人员应为POCT的实施提供指导和框架,以确保质量结果和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1