Correlation of Qualitative Alpha1-microglobulin, Values of Interleukin 6, Cervicometry and Cervical Infection in Pregnant Women with Symptoms of Preterm Birth

A. C. Banicevic, Amela Ceric, Miroslav Popovic, Zvjezdana Ritan Micic
{"title":"Correlation of Qualitative Alpha1-microglobulin, Values of Interleukin 6, Cervicometry and Cervical Infection in Pregnant Women with Symptoms of Preterm Birth","authors":"A. C. Banicevic, Amela Ceric, Miroslav Popovic, Zvjezdana Ritan Micic","doi":"10.5455/msm.2023.35.118-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the problems in modern obstetrics is how to identify and select pregnant women who are most likely to give premature birth. In the last ten years, due to false-positive test results, i.e., tests with low positive predictive values, there is an increase in unnecessary hospitalization days as well as unnecessary therapy. The probability of preterm birth is 25% in a population of pregnant women with symptoms of preterm birth. Objective: The aim was to analyze diagnostic accuracy of tests for the purpose of predicting premature births in< 37th and <34th week of pregnancy. Incidence of preterm births in < 37th week of pregnancy was 28%, while the incidence of preterm births up until 34th week of pregnancy, was < 8%. Methods: We included two groups of pregnant women in a prospective study; one group with the symptoms of threatening preterm birth between 22nd and 37th week of pregnancy and the other one of the same gestation period with no symptoms. Results: Each pregnant woman underwent test for placental alpha microglobulin-1, cervical length screening, cervical sampling for microbiological analysis, blood sampling for IL6 and CRP analysis. There were 16% of preterm births, up until 7 days from hospitalization, and they were all PAMG-1 positive; There is 75% of preterm births if PAMG-1 is positive with cervical length under 25mm. Combining tests, we reached the best predictive accuracy with positive PAMG-1 test, cervical length under 15mm along with the increase of CRP values above 15.96%. Conclusion: Total number of hospitalization days was 29% with preterm births up to 71% with full term births regardless the symptomatology, which justifies further studies towards releasing the pressure from the health care system and from doctors as well in the process of reaching a decision on treatment of pregnant women with the signs of preterm birth.","PeriodicalId":18358,"journal":{"name":"Materia Socio-Medica","volume":"29 1","pages":"118 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia Socio-Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2023.35.118-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the problems in modern obstetrics is how to identify and select pregnant women who are most likely to give premature birth. In the last ten years, due to false-positive test results, i.e., tests with low positive predictive values, there is an increase in unnecessary hospitalization days as well as unnecessary therapy. The probability of preterm birth is 25% in a population of pregnant women with symptoms of preterm birth. Objective: The aim was to analyze diagnostic accuracy of tests for the purpose of predicting premature births in< 37th and <34th week of pregnancy. Incidence of preterm births in < 37th week of pregnancy was 28%, while the incidence of preterm births up until 34th week of pregnancy, was < 8%. Methods: We included two groups of pregnant women in a prospective study; one group with the symptoms of threatening preterm birth between 22nd and 37th week of pregnancy and the other one of the same gestation period with no symptoms. Results: Each pregnant woman underwent test for placental alpha microglobulin-1, cervical length screening, cervical sampling for microbiological analysis, blood sampling for IL6 and CRP analysis. There were 16% of preterm births, up until 7 days from hospitalization, and they were all PAMG-1 positive; There is 75% of preterm births if PAMG-1 is positive with cervical length under 25mm. Combining tests, we reached the best predictive accuracy with positive PAMG-1 test, cervical length under 15mm along with the increase of CRP values above 15.96%. Conclusion: Total number of hospitalization days was 29% with preterm births up to 71% with full term births regardless the symptomatology, which justifies further studies towards releasing the pressure from the health care system and from doctors as well in the process of reaching a decision on treatment of pregnant women with the signs of preterm birth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有早产症状的孕妇α - 1微球蛋白、白细胞介素6、宫颈测量与宫颈感染的相关性
背景:如何识别和选择最容易早产的孕妇是现代产科面临的问题之一。在过去十年中,由于假阳性检测结果,即低阳性预测值的检测,不必要的住院天数和不必要的治疗都有所增加。在有早产症状的孕妇人群中,早产的概率为25%。目的:分析检查对妊娠< 37周和<34周早产儿的诊断准确性。妊娠< 37周的早产发生率为28%,而妊娠至34周的早产发生率< 8%。方法:我们将两组孕妇纳入前瞻性研究;其中一组在妊娠第22周至第37周有早产威胁的症状,另一组在同一妊娠期无症状。结果:所有孕妇均接受胎盘α -微球蛋白-1检测、宫颈长度筛查、宫颈微生物学检测、il - 6和CRP检测。16%的早产儿在住院后7天内均为PAMG-1阳性;如果PAMG-1阳性且宫颈长度小于25mm,则早产率为75%。综合各项指标,PAMG-1检测阳性、宫颈长度小于15mm、CRP升高15.96%以上预测准确率最高。结论:无论症状如何,早产患者住院总天数为29%,足月分娩患者住院总天数为71%,这表明在决定对有早产迹象的孕妇进行治疗的过程中,有必要进一步研究以减轻卫生保健系统和医生的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Pediatric Intensive Care Professionals. The Evaluation of Intestinal Permeability in Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Acquisition of New Philips Affiniti 30 Vascular Color Doppler Ultrasound Device - Cost Benefit Analysis to Reduce Cardiosurgical Patients' Treatment. Behavioral and Knowledge Patterns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics Among Urban and Rural Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina-a Cross-sectional Study. Domestic Violence During Women's Life in Developing Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1