Evaluating Corporate Impacts on the SDGs – Tools, Cases, and Future Challenges

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation Pub Date : 2020-10-21 DOI:10.31244/zfe.2020.02.04
Heike Vogel-Pöschl, A. Martinuzzi, N. Schönherr
{"title":"Evaluating Corporate Impacts on the SDGs – Tools, Cases, and Future Challenges","authors":"Heike Vogel-Pöschl, A. Martinuzzi, N. Schönherr","doi":"10.31244/zfe.2020.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a state-of-the-art review on how companies try to evaluate their impacts on the SDGs. It presents a quantitative analysis of 170 tools for corporate impact evaluation. In addition, fi ve selected tools were tested in collaboration with three multinational corporations. The diversity of tools is enormous, and the market is relatively new and opaque. Only a few tools use complete logic frameworks, the pathways of impact are rarely uncovered, data assurance is not a common standard, third-party verifi cation is rare, and none of the tools applies systems concepts. As a result, companies run the risk of creating a smooth façade of controllability, while underestimating the complexity of impacts and overlooking important leverage points. Bridging the gap between the business sector and the evaluation community could lift the practice of corporate impact evaluation to a higher level.","PeriodicalId":41629,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","volume":"4 1","pages":"261-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2020.02.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper provides a state-of-the-art review on how companies try to evaluate their impacts on the SDGs. It presents a quantitative analysis of 170 tools for corporate impact evaluation. In addition, fi ve selected tools were tested in collaboration with three multinational corporations. The diversity of tools is enormous, and the market is relatively new and opaque. Only a few tools use complete logic frameworks, the pathways of impact are rarely uncovered, data assurance is not a common standard, third-party verifi cation is rare, and none of the tools applies systems concepts. As a result, companies run the risk of creating a smooth façade of controllability, while underestimating the complexity of impacts and overlooking important leverage points. Bridging the gap between the business sector and the evaluation community could lift the practice of corporate impact evaluation to a higher level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估企业对可持续发展目标的影响:工具、案例和未来挑战
本文对企业如何评估其对可持续发展目标的影响进行了最新的回顾。本文对170种企业影响评价工具进行了定量分析。此外,还与三家跨国公司合作测试了五种选定的工具。工具的多样性是巨大的,市场相对较新且不透明。只有少数工具使用完整的逻辑框架,影响的途径很少被发现,数据保证不是一个通用标准,第三方验证很少,而且没有一个工具应用系统概念。结果,公司冒着创造一个平滑的可控性假象的风险,同时低估了影响的复杂性,忽视了重要的杠杆点。缩小商业部门和评价界之间的差距可以将企业影响评价的做法提升到一个更高的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Die Kompetenzstelle der Bundesregierung für Evaluierung im Statistischen Bundesamt Meta-Evaluierungen von Projektevaluierungen in der Praxis: Erfahrungen aus der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Terms of Reference Matter – Insights from Evaluations of Finnish Development Cooperation Machtwissen? Evaluation zwischen Evidenz und (Mikro-)Politik. Persönliche Eindrücke zur Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Evaluation e.V. (DeGEval), 14.–16. September 2022 Hybride Lehre an Universitäten – eine Evaluation hybrider Seminare am Beispiel des Kompetenzzentrums Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Saarland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1