Multiparametric Approach with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mri, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Mrs of The Breast in Assessment of Suspicious Breast Lesions

SM Abd Elsalam, A. Said, M. Sarah
{"title":"Multiparametric Approach with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mri, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Mrs of The Breast in Assessment of Suspicious Breast Lesions","authors":"SM Abd Elsalam, A. Said, M. Sarah","doi":"10.1177/0300891620914144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Breast cancer is the most invasive malignant tumour in females worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer death in females after lung cancer. In Egypt, cancer breast is the first common site of tumours among females (32%) and the second common tumour site in both sexes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) with ultrasound +/- conventional mammography in differentiating suspicious breast masses (BI-RADS III and IV) and to suggest the most accurate imaging combination for early diagnosis and treatment of cancer breast. Materials and Methods: The study included 40 patients with suspicious breast lesions detected by clinical examination, ultrasound+/- mammography . Dynamic MRI study was performed using 1.5T MRI. Lesions were analyzed regarding their morphology, kinetic curve pattern, ADC value and tCho peak measurement. The results of each MRI parameter were correlated to histo-pathology. Results: In this study sensitivity of sono-mammography was 70% and its specificity was 66.6%. According to using MRI sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 80% by using morphological and curve patterns. As regarding MRS sensitivity was 50% and specificity was 86.7%. Regarding sensitivity of ADC was 90%while its specificity was 93%. The cut off ADC value was 0.95 x 10−3 mm2/s. By using MRI with additive modalities (ADC and MRS) sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 93%. Conclusion: In comparison with MRI, sonomammography alone lack both sensitivity and specificity in detection of breast lesions in suspicious cases. MRI with additive modalities (ADC and MRS) is the best imaging modality in detection of malignant cases and exclusion of benign cases.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"16 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891620914144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most invasive malignant tumour in females worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer death in females after lung cancer. In Egypt, cancer breast is the first common site of tumours among females (32%) and the second common tumour site in both sexes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) with ultrasound +/- conventional mammography in differentiating suspicious breast masses (BI-RADS III and IV) and to suggest the most accurate imaging combination for early diagnosis and treatment of cancer breast. Materials and Methods: The study included 40 patients with suspicious breast lesions detected by clinical examination, ultrasound+/- mammography . Dynamic MRI study was performed using 1.5T MRI. Lesions were analyzed regarding their morphology, kinetic curve pattern, ADC value and tCho peak measurement. The results of each MRI parameter were correlated to histo-pathology. Results: In this study sensitivity of sono-mammography was 70% and its specificity was 66.6%. According to using MRI sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 80% by using morphological and curve patterns. As regarding MRS sensitivity was 50% and specificity was 86.7%. Regarding sensitivity of ADC was 90%while its specificity was 93%. The cut off ADC value was 0.95 x 10−3 mm2/s. By using MRI with additive modalities (ADC and MRS) sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 93%. Conclusion: In comparison with MRI, sonomammography alone lack both sensitivity and specificity in detection of breast lesions in suspicious cases. MRI with additive modalities (ADC and MRS) is the best imaging modality in detection of malignant cases and exclusion of benign cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态增强Mri、弥散加权成像和Mrs的多参数方法在评估可疑乳腺病变中的应用
简介:乳腺癌是世界范围内女性最具侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,是女性癌症死亡的第二大原因,仅次于肺癌。在埃及,乳腺癌是女性肿瘤的第一个常见部位(32%),是两性肿瘤的第二个常见部位。本研究的目的是评估和比较超声+/-常规乳房x线摄影(BI-RADS III和IV)中扩散加权成像(DWI)、动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)和磁共振波谱(MRS)定量参数在鉴别可疑乳房肿块(BI-RADS III和IV)中的诊断性能,并建议最准确的早期诊断和治疗癌性乳房的影像学组合。材料与方法:选取40例经临床检查、超声+/-乳房x光检查发现可疑乳腺病变的患者为研究对象。采用1.5T MRI进行动态MRI研究。分析病变形态、动力学曲线模式、ADC值和tCho峰值测量。各MRI参数结果与组织病理相关。结果:本组超声检查的敏感性为70%,特异性为66.6%。通过形态学和曲线分析,MRI敏感性为90%,特异性为80%。MRS敏感性为50%,特异性为86.7%。ADC的敏感性为90%,特异性为93%。截止ADC值为0.95 × 10−3 mm2/s。MRI加性成像(ADC和MRS)灵敏度为100%,特异性为93%。结论:与MRI相比,单纯超声造影对可疑病例乳腺病变的检测缺乏敏感性和特异性。MRI加性模式(ADC和MRS)是发现恶性病例和排除良性病例的最佳成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROACT 2.0: A new open-source tool to improve patient-doctor communication in clinical trials Response to lorlatinib rechallenge in a case of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC with a resistance mutation to second generation TKIs The digital revolution in pathology: Towards a smarter approach to research and treatment The power of art and the powers of adolescents with cancer: Age-specific projects at Italian pediatric oncology centers bgicc 2024 abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1