Prescription Audit towards Quality Indicators at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India

A. Chakraborty, Mohammad Riyash, K. Srinivasan, V. Lakshmi
{"title":"Prescription Audit towards Quality Indicators at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India","authors":"A. Chakraborty, Mohammad Riyash, K. Srinivasan, V. Lakshmi","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2020.45796.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The World Health Organization has laid down guidelines for rational prescriptions. Adherence to those guidelines is an important aspect of medication safety. In India, such adherence is mandatory towards National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Health-care Providers (NABH) accreditation of health-care facilities. The audition of the prescriptions is therefore a quality improvement process that indirectly benefits the health-care stakeholders. Such an audit is part of the NABH Management of Medication and is monitored by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics (PT moreover, 97% (n=4656) and 47% (n=2256) of the prescriptions were legible and were written in generics, respectively. Furthermore, 97% (n=4656) of the orders had a physician’s signature, and 70% (3360) of them had a clinical review. It should be noted that only 1% (n=48) of the orders had drug-drug and drug-food documented interactions. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, physicians did not document suggestions regarding drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Moreover, there were fewer numbers of prescriptions written in generics. In addition, the majority of the medication orders were legible and adhered to standards in the 12th month. This may be due to sharing the monthly audit reports with various departments and the continuous feedback process involving the P&T committee.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"10 1","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2020.45796.1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization has laid down guidelines for rational prescriptions. Adherence to those guidelines is an important aspect of medication safety. In India, such adherence is mandatory towards National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Health-care Providers (NABH) accreditation of health-care facilities. The audition of the prescriptions is therefore a quality improvement process that indirectly benefits the health-care stakeholders. Such an audit is part of the NABH Management of Medication and is monitored by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics (PT moreover, 97% (n=4656) and 47% (n=2256) of the prescriptions were legible and were written in generics, respectively. Furthermore, 97% (n=4656) of the orders had a physician’s signature, and 70% (3360) of them had a clinical review. It should be noted that only 1% (n=48) of the orders had drug-drug and drug-food documented interactions. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, physicians did not document suggestions regarding drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Moreover, there were fewer numbers of prescriptions written in generics. In addition, the majority of the medication orders were legible and adhered to standards in the 12th month. This may be due to sharing the monthly audit reports with various departments and the continuous feedback process involving the P&T committee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南印度一家三级护理教学医院的处方质量指标审计
导言:世界卫生组织制定了合理处方的指导方针。遵守这些指导方针是药物安全的一个重要方面。在印度,这种遵守是对医院和保健提供者国家认证委员会(NABH)对保健设施认证的强制性要求。因此,对处方的审核是一个质量改进过程,间接使保健利益攸关方受益。这种审核是NABH药物管理的一部分,由药学和治疗学(PT)监督,此外,97% (n=4656)和47% (n=2256)的处方是可读的,分别是用仿制药写的。此外,97% (n=4656)的订单有医生的签名,70%(3360)的订单有临床评论。值得注意的是,只有1% (n=48)的订单记录了药物-药物和药物-食品的相互作用。结论:根据这项研究的结果,医生没有记录关于药物-药物和药物-食物相互作用的建议。此外,仿制药的处方数量也较少。此外,在第12个月,大多数药物单是可读的,并符合标准。这可能是由于与各部门共享每月的审计报告,以及涉及P&T委员会的持续反馈过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Lophomonas blattarum in bronchoalveolar lavage samples comparison of Social adjustment, school satisfaction and mental health in girls with and without precocious puberty A Critical Analysis Study of Pharmacological and Clinical Information Provided in Drug Package Inserts Based on Drugs and Cosmetics Rules Guidelines Evaluation of the Frequency of Stimulant and Opioid Abuse in the Poisoned Cases Referred To Hospitals in Ardabil, Iran Comparing Symptoms of Anxiety Disorders and Related Transdiagnostic Factors in Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1