Can e-books foster child language? Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of e-book interventions in early childhood education and care

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100472
Franziska Egert , Anne-Kristin Cordes , Fabienne Hartig
{"title":"Can e-books foster child language? Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of e-book interventions in early childhood education and care","authors":"Franziska Egert ,&nbsp;Anne-Kristin Cordes ,&nbsp;Fabienne Hartig","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Language abilities in the early years are a strong predictor of children's success in school. However, a considerable number of children enter school with poor language skills. Therefore, one of the most important but also challenging mandates of early childhood education<span> and care [ECEC] is to promote these skills before school enrolment. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that shared book reading is a valuable tool to narrow this gap in the early years. In the digital age, e-books might offer new opportunities to foster language development in ECEC. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of e-book interventions in comparison to regular childcare and to shared print book reading in classrooms. The systematic search, examining studies from 2000 to 2018, was carried out by two independent reviewers. A random-effect model was used to aggregate findings. Altogether, 17 studies with 30 different e-book treatments were included. Children benefited significantly more from the e-book interventions compared to regular childcare (</span></span><em>g</em> = 0.85). Activities with e-books were also ahead of print storybook reading in ECEC (<em>g</em><span> = 0.45). The effectiveness was mainly moderated by story repetition, number of sessions, and embeddedness in the classroom. E-books were primarily researcher-developed and included congruent functions to foster language development. Implications for practice, research and app development are discussed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Language abilities in the early years are a strong predictor of children's success in school. However, a considerable number of children enter school with poor language skills. Therefore, one of the most important but also challenging mandates of early childhood education and care [ECEC] is to promote these skills before school enrolment. Meta-analytic evidence suggests that shared book reading is a valuable tool to narrow this gap in the early years. In the digital age, e-books might offer new opportunities to foster language development in ECEC. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of e-book interventions in comparison to regular childcare and to shared print book reading in classrooms. The systematic search, examining studies from 2000 to 2018, was carried out by two independent reviewers. A random-effect model was used to aggregate findings. Altogether, 17 studies with 30 different e-book treatments were included. Children benefited significantly more from the e-book interventions compared to regular childcare (g = 0.85). Activities with e-books were also ahead of print storybook reading in ECEC (g = 0.45). The effectiveness was mainly moderated by story repetition, number of sessions, and embeddedness in the classroom. E-books were primarily researcher-developed and included congruent functions to foster language development. Implications for practice, research and app development are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子书能培养孩子的语言能力吗?电子书干预幼儿教育与护理效果的meta分析
早期的语言能力是孩子在学校成功的一个强有力的预测指标。然而,相当多的孩子入学时语言技能很差。因此,早期儿童教育和护理(ECEC)最重要但也最具挑战性的任务之一是在入学前促进这些技能。元分析证据表明,共享读书是缩小这一差距的宝贵工具。在数字时代,电子书可能会提供新的机会来促进中欧国家的语言发展。这项荟萃分析调查了电子书干预的有效性,并将其与常规儿童保育和课堂上共享的纸质书阅读进行了比较。系统搜索,检查了2000年至2018年的研究,由两名独立评审员进行。随机效应模型用于汇总研究结果。总共包括17项研究,30种不同的电子书治疗方法。与常规托儿服务相比,儿童从电子书干预中获益明显更多(g = 0.85)。在ECEC中,电子书阅读活动也领先于纸质故事书阅读活动(g = 0.45)。效果主要受故事重复、会话次数和课堂嵌入程度的影响。电子书主要是研究人员开发的,并包含了促进语言发展的一致性功能。讨论了对实践、研究和应用程序开发的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between teacher talk and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis Self-regulated learning strategies in continuing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effect of teacher training programs on pre-service and in-service teachers’ global competence: A meta-analysis Editorial Board What can Implementation Science tell us about scaling interventions in school settings? A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1