Long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting for canalicular obstructions

Manpreet Singh, Manpreet Kaur, Z. Zadeng, M. Sharma, Aditi Mehta, P. Gupta
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting for canalicular obstructions","authors":"Manpreet Singh, Manpreet Kaur, Z. Zadeng, M. Sharma, Aditi Mehta, P. Gupta","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To study the long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination (LCT) with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting (VAMS) for the treatment of epiphora secondary to lacrimal canalicular obstructions (LCO). Methods: Our study was a retrospective interventional work. All patients diagnosed with LCO, having morbid epiphora (Munk’s scale ≥ 2), were included. The LCO was divided as proximal (< 6mm from punctum) and distal (≥ 6mm from punctum). Sisler’s lacrimal trephine (21 gauge) was used to recanalize the LCO with monocanalicular stent (0.64mm diameter) insertion, which was kept for a minimum of 6 weeks and a post-stent removal follow-up of 12 months was ensured. Fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were used as functional and anatomical tests for evaluation, respectively. Results: We included 73 eyes of 52 patients having a mean age of 44.5 years. Of the total, the proximal LCO was seen in 38 eyes (52.1%) and distal in 35 eyes (47.9%). The preoperative Munk’s score of 5 was noted in the majority (n=57 eyes, 78.1%). The majority (n=32 eyes, 43.8%) had chronic blepharitis or meibomian gland disease as etiology. Monocanalicular stent was kept in place for a mean of 13.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete response was noted in 35.6% cases, while 50.7% had partial and 13.7% had a failure of the procedure. Conclusions: LCT (without DCR) is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective technique for the treatment of LCO in the long term. VAMS is a helpful innovation to facilitate the insertion of the flexible silicone stent.","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"72 1","pages":"41 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To study the long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination (LCT) with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting (VAMS) for the treatment of epiphora secondary to lacrimal canalicular obstructions (LCO). Methods: Our study was a retrospective interventional work. All patients diagnosed with LCO, having morbid epiphora (Munk’s scale ≥ 2), were included. The LCO was divided as proximal (< 6mm from punctum) and distal (≥ 6mm from punctum). Sisler’s lacrimal trephine (21 gauge) was used to recanalize the LCO with monocanalicular stent (0.64mm diameter) insertion, which was kept for a minimum of 6 weeks and a post-stent removal follow-up of 12 months was ensured. Fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were used as functional and anatomical tests for evaluation, respectively. Results: We included 73 eyes of 52 patients having a mean age of 44.5 years. Of the total, the proximal LCO was seen in 38 eyes (52.1%) and distal in 35 eyes (47.9%). The preoperative Munk’s score of 5 was noted in the majority (n=57 eyes, 78.1%). The majority (n=32 eyes, 43.8%) had chronic blepharitis or meibomian gland disease as etiology. Monocanalicular stent was kept in place for a mean of 13.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete response was noted in 35.6% cases, while 50.7% had partial and 13.7% had a failure of the procedure. Conclusions: LCT (without DCR) is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective technique for the treatment of LCO in the long term. VAMS is a helpful innovation to facilitate the insertion of the flexible silicone stent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泪小管插管与粘弹性辅助单小管支架置入术治疗泪小管阻塞的长期疗效
目的:探讨泪小管穿刺(LCT)联合粘弹性辅助单管支架(VAMS)治疗继发性泪小管阻塞(LCO)的远期疗效。方法:回顾性介入研究。所有诊断为LCO的患者均伴有病态上睑下垂(Munk量表≥2)。LCO分为近端(距点< 6mm)和远端(距点≥6mm)。采用Sisler泪道环钻(21号)再通LCO,置入单管支架(直径0.64mm),至少保持6周,支架取出后随访12个月。荧光素染色消失试验和泪道冲洗试验分别作为功能试验和解剖试验进行评价。结果:我们纳入了52例患者73只眼,平均年龄44.5岁。其中近端LCO 38眼(52.1%),远端LCO 35眼(47.9%)。术前Munk’s评分为5分的占多数(57眼,78.1%)。多数(n=32只眼,43.8%)病因为慢性睑缘炎或睑板腺疾病。单管支架放置时间平均为13.5周。在平均14.5个月的随访中,35.6%的患者完全缓解,50.7%的患者部分缓解,13.7%的患者手术失败。结论:LCT(无DCR)是一种微创、简便、长期治疗LCO的有效技术。VAMS是一个有用的创新,以方便柔性硅胶支架的插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rare case report: a 26-year-old man with Eales' disease. Apert Syndrome - caveats of squint management. Assessment of the efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of dry eye disease during COVID-19 pandemic. Dynamics of the association between visual and auditory functional changes in glaucoma. Preliminary results. Decreased perifoveal ganglion cell complex thickness - a first sign for macular damage in patients using hydroxychloroquine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1