Parent and Child Factors Predicting Early Intervention Choices of Australian Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI:10.1017/jsi.2019.9
Sarah Carlon, M. Carter, J. Stephenson, Naomi Sweller
{"title":"Parent and Child Factors Predicting Early Intervention Choices of Australian Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder","authors":"Sarah Carlon, M. Carter, J. Stephenson, Naomi Sweller","doi":"10.1017/jsi.2019.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Extant research addressing implicit factors related to intervention decisions made by parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is limited and findings have been inconsistent. In the present study, 74 parents of preschoolers with ASD were surveyed regarding intervention use. The possible relationships between implicit parent factors (education level, age, causal beliefs about ASD, complementary and alternative medicine [CAM] use, and family income) and child factors (time since diagnosis, and perceived severity of ASD), and the number and type of interventions used were examined. Consistent with previous research, only a small number of significant relationships were found, including that family income, parent use of CAM, mother’s education, parent belief in an unknown aetiology of ASD, and time since child’s diagnosis were all related to the number of interventions used. Some specific findings of previous research were not replicated in the present study (e.g., neither beliefs in environmental aetiology of ASD nor parent education levels were related to the use of specific CAM interventions), indicating that factors affecting decision-making may not be consistent across samples. Nevertheless, future research including an expanded range of possible implicit factors with more diverse samples may provide a more accurate predictive model of parent decision-making.","PeriodicalId":53789,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"83 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2019.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Extant research addressing implicit factors related to intervention decisions made by parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is limited and findings have been inconsistent. In the present study, 74 parents of preschoolers with ASD were surveyed regarding intervention use. The possible relationships between implicit parent factors (education level, age, causal beliefs about ASD, complementary and alternative medicine [CAM] use, and family income) and child factors (time since diagnosis, and perceived severity of ASD), and the number and type of interventions used were examined. Consistent with previous research, only a small number of significant relationships were found, including that family income, parent use of CAM, mother’s education, parent belief in an unknown aetiology of ASD, and time since child’s diagnosis were all related to the number of interventions used. Some specific findings of previous research were not replicated in the present study (e.g., neither beliefs in environmental aetiology of ASD nor parent education levels were related to the use of specific CAM interventions), indicating that factors affecting decision-making may not be consistent across samples. Nevertheless, future research including an expanded range of possible implicit factors with more diverse samples may provide a more accurate predictive model of parent decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母和儿童因素对澳大利亚自闭症谱系障碍儿童父母早期干预选择的影响
针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童家长干预决策相关的隐性因素的现有研究有限,研究结果也不一致。在本研究中,对74名患有自闭症的学龄前儿童的父母进行了干预使用调查。研究了隐性父母因素(教育水平、年龄、对ASD的因果信念、补充和替代医学的使用以及家庭收入)和儿童因素(自诊断以来的时间、ASD的严重程度)之间可能存在的关系,以及所使用的干预措施的数量和类型。与之前的研究一致,只有少数显著的关系被发现,包括家庭收入,父母使用CAM,母亲的教育程度,父母对未知的ASD病因的信念,以及孩子诊断后的时间都与使用的干预措施的数量有关。先前研究的一些具体发现在本研究中没有得到重复(例如,对ASD的环境病因学的信念和父母的教育水平都与特定CAM干预措施的使用无关),这表明影响决策的因素可能在样本中不一致。然而,未来的研究包括更广泛的可能的隐性因素和更多样化的样本,可能会提供一个更准确的预测模型的父母决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
‘That’s Not Something That’s Necessarily on the Radar’: Educators’ Perspectives on Dysgraphia The Case for Special Education Teacher Wellbeing: A Multidimensional Review of the Evidence and Future Directions Transition From Primary to Secondary School From the Perspectives of Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Concomitant Intellectual Giftedness A Preliminary Study Connecting School Improvement and MTSS With Student Outcomes JSI volume 47 issue 2 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1