Model selection in markovian processes

Assaf Hallak, Dotan Di Castro, Shie Mannor
{"title":"Model selection in markovian processes","authors":"Assaf Hallak, Dotan Di Castro, Shie Mannor","doi":"10.1145/2487575.2487613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When analyzing data that originated from a dynamical system, a common practice is to encompass the problem in the well known frameworks of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). The state space in these solutions is usually chosen in some heuristic fashion and the formed MDP can then be used to simulate and predict data, as well as indicate the best possible action in each state. The model chosen to characterize the data affects the complexity and accuracy of any further action we may wish to apply, yet few methods that rely on the dynamic structure to select such a model were suggested. In this work we address the problem of how to use time series data to choose from a finite set of candidate discrete state spaces, where these spaces are constructed by a domain expert. We formalize the notion of model selection consistency in the proposed setup. We then discuss the difference between our proposed framework and the classical Maximum Likelihood (ML) framework, and give an example where ML fails. Afterwards, we suggest alternative selection criteria and show them to be weakly consistent. We then define weak consistency for a model construction algorithm and show a simple algorithm that is weakly consistent. Finally, we test the performance of the suggested criteria and algorithm on both simulated and real world data.","PeriodicalId":20472,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

When analyzing data that originated from a dynamical system, a common practice is to encompass the problem in the well known frameworks of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). The state space in these solutions is usually chosen in some heuristic fashion and the formed MDP can then be used to simulate and predict data, as well as indicate the best possible action in each state. The model chosen to characterize the data affects the complexity and accuracy of any further action we may wish to apply, yet few methods that rely on the dynamic structure to select such a model were suggested. In this work we address the problem of how to use time series data to choose from a finite set of candidate discrete state spaces, where these spaces are constructed by a domain expert. We formalize the notion of model selection consistency in the proposed setup. We then discuss the difference between our proposed framework and the classical Maximum Likelihood (ML) framework, and give an example where ML fails. Afterwards, we suggest alternative selection criteria and show them to be weakly consistent. We then define weak consistency for a model construction algorithm and show a simple algorithm that is weakly consistent. Finally, we test the performance of the suggested criteria and algorithm on both simulated and real world data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尔可夫过程中的模型选择
当分析来自动态系统的数据时,一种常见的做法是将问题包含在众所周知的马尔可夫决策过程(mdp)和强化学习(RL)框架中。这些解决方案中的状态空间通常以某种启发式方式选择,然后可以使用形成的MDP来模拟和预测数据,并指出每个状态中的最佳操作。所选择的表征数据的模型会影响我们可能希望应用的任何进一步行动的复杂性和准确性,但很少有方法依赖于动态结构来选择这样的模型。在这项工作中,我们解决了如何使用时间序列数据从有限的候选离散状态空间中进行选择的问题,这些空间由领域专家构建。我们在提出的设置中形式化了模型选择一致性的概念。然后,我们讨论了我们提出的框架与经典的最大似然(ML)框架之间的区别,并给出了ML失败的例子。然后,我们提出了备选的选择标准,并表明它们是弱一致的。然后,我们定义了一个模型构建算法的弱一致性,并给出了一个弱一致性的简单算法。最后,我们在模拟和真实世界的数据上测试了所建议的标准和算法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A general bootstrap performance diagnostic Flexible and robust co-regularized multi-domain graph clustering Beyond myopic inference in big data pipelines Constrained stochastic gradient descent for large-scale least squares problem Inferring distant-time location in low-sampling-rate trajectories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1