Gastric decontamination in aluminium phosphide poisoning: a case against the use of water-based solutions

H. Sanaei-Zadeh, S. Marashi
{"title":"Gastric decontamination in aluminium phosphide poisoning: a case against the use of water-based solutions","authors":"H. Sanaei-Zadeh, S. Marashi","doi":"10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor-in-Chief, We read with great interest the article entitled “A review of aluminium phosphide poisoning and a flowchart to treat it” written by Hashemi-Domeneh et al. (1) and recently published in the Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. The authors mentioned performing a gastric lavage using a solution of potassium permanganate (1/10000/1 g per 10 L) and administering activated charcoal (1 g kg-1 in children and 50-100 g in adults) and sodium bicarbonate (two 44 meq vials [100 mL] per L) as options for gastrointestinal decontamination, claiming that these compounds can be effective at decreasing toxic phosphine (PH3) production. However, a closer look at the list of references in the paper indicated that none of these protocols have yet been clinically studied. What drew our attention is that these solutions are composed of water. Therefore, they can facilitate PH3 gas release from aluminium phosphide (AlP) (2). To document this phenomenon, we added a 5 g tablet of Bhostoxin® into 50 mL solutions of sodium bicarbonate (44 meq), potassium permanganate (0.005 g; 1/10000 solution), activated charcoal (10 g), and castor oil (see Figure 1). The other important points recently considered by scientists and which speak in favour of our argument include an exothermic reaction that follows potassium permanganate administration (3, 4), induction of haemolysis and methemoglobinemia due to the oxidizing properties of potassium permanganate (5, 6), inconceivability of PH3 oxidation following administration of potassium permanganate considering that it is a hard nucleophile (7), and inefficiency of charcoal in AlP adsorption and prevention of PH3 release (8). On the other hand, in vitro studies have proposed that liquid vegetable oils and paraffin are effective in the prevention of phosphine fumigation (9), which has been supported by a successful management of acute AlP poisoning in a case report as well as in an animal study (10, 11). To conclude, solutions composed of water should not be used for gastric decontamination after acute AlP poisoning. Instead, using vegetable oils for gastric lavage or castor oil to inhibit greater PH3 release as well as stimulation of luminal evacuation (2) could be practical. However, this idea has not been evaluated in a properly designed study. Instead of gastric lavage, we have the experience of giving 60 mL of castor oil orally for gastrointestinal decontamination in all of the cases of acute AlP toxicity presented to the three main university hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, within the last three years. This appears to be a good starting point. Hence, the evaluation of its efficacy in a randomized clinical trial should be the next step.","PeriodicalId":8292,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"41 1","pages":"364 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Dear Editor-in-Chief, We read with great interest the article entitled “A review of aluminium phosphide poisoning and a flowchart to treat it” written by Hashemi-Domeneh et al. (1) and recently published in the Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. The authors mentioned performing a gastric lavage using a solution of potassium permanganate (1/10000/1 g per 10 L) and administering activated charcoal (1 g kg-1 in children and 50-100 g in adults) and sodium bicarbonate (two 44 meq vials [100 mL] per L) as options for gastrointestinal decontamination, claiming that these compounds can be effective at decreasing toxic phosphine (PH3) production. However, a closer look at the list of references in the paper indicated that none of these protocols have yet been clinically studied. What drew our attention is that these solutions are composed of water. Therefore, they can facilitate PH3 gas release from aluminium phosphide (AlP) (2). To document this phenomenon, we added a 5 g tablet of Bhostoxin® into 50 mL solutions of sodium bicarbonate (44 meq), potassium permanganate (0.005 g; 1/10000 solution), activated charcoal (10 g), and castor oil (see Figure 1). The other important points recently considered by scientists and which speak in favour of our argument include an exothermic reaction that follows potassium permanganate administration (3, 4), induction of haemolysis and methemoglobinemia due to the oxidizing properties of potassium permanganate (5, 6), inconceivability of PH3 oxidation following administration of potassium permanganate considering that it is a hard nucleophile (7), and inefficiency of charcoal in AlP adsorption and prevention of PH3 release (8). On the other hand, in vitro studies have proposed that liquid vegetable oils and paraffin are effective in the prevention of phosphine fumigation (9), which has been supported by a successful management of acute AlP poisoning in a case report as well as in an animal study (10, 11). To conclude, solutions composed of water should not be used for gastric decontamination after acute AlP poisoning. Instead, using vegetable oils for gastric lavage or castor oil to inhibit greater PH3 release as well as stimulation of luminal evacuation (2) could be practical. However, this idea has not been evaluated in a properly designed study. Instead of gastric lavage, we have the experience of giving 60 mL of castor oil orally for gastrointestinal decontamination in all of the cases of acute AlP toxicity presented to the three main university hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, within the last three years. This appears to be a good starting point. Hence, the evaluation of its efficacy in a randomized clinical trial should be the next step.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磷化铝中毒的胃净化:一个反对使用水基溶液的案例
尊敬的总编辑,我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了Hashemi-Domeneh等人(1)最近发表在《工业卫生与毒理学档案》上的一篇题为《磷化铝中毒的综述和治疗流程图》的文章。作者提到使用高锰酸钾溶液(1/10000/1 g /10 L)进行洗胃,并给予活性炭(儿童1 g kg-1,成人50-100 g)和碳酸氢钠(每L两个44 meq小瓶[100 mL])作为胃肠道净化的选择,声称这些化合物可以有效减少有毒磷化氢(PH3)的产生。然而,仔细查看论文中的参考文献列表表明,这些方案尚未进行临床研究。引起我们注意的是这些溶液是由水组成的。因此,它们可以促进磷化铝(AlP)释放PH3气体(2)。为了证明这一现象,我们将5 g Bhostoxin®片加入50 mL碳酸氢钠(44 meq),高锰酸钾(0.005 g;1/10000溶液),活性炭(10克)和蓖麻油(见图1)。最近科学家们考虑的其他重要观点支持我们的观点,包括高锰酸钾给药后的放热反应(3,4),高锰酸钾氧化特性导致的溶血和高铁血红蛋白血症(5,6),不可思议的PH3高锰酸钾的氧化后政府考虑到这是一个艰难的亲核试剂(7),在高山和低效的木炭吸附和预防PH3释放(8)。另一方面,体外研究提出,液体植物油和石蜡是有效预防磷化氢熏蒸(9),已由一个成功的管理急性高山中毒的病例报告以及在动物研究中(10、11)。综上所述,急性AlP中毒后,不应使用水组成的溶液进行胃净化。相反,使用植物油或蓖麻油来洗胃,以抑制PH3的释放,并刺激腔内排泄(2)可能是可行的。然而,这个想法还没有在一个适当设计的研究中得到评估。在过去三年中,在伊朗设拉子的三所主要大学医院,我们有给所有急性AlP中毒病例口服60毫升蓖麻油以消除胃肠道污染的经验,而不是洗胃。这似乎是一个很好的起点。因此,下一步应在随机临床试验中评估其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicopathological Changes Induced By Combined Exposure To Noise and Toluene in New Zealand White Rabbits Kidney Cell DNA Damage Caused By Combined Exposure To Volatile Anaesthetics and 1 Gy Or 2 Gy Radiotherapy Dose in Vivo In Vitro Antifungal Effect of Phenylboronic and Boric Acid on Alternaria Alternata Ochratoxin a Potentiates Citrinin Accumulation in Kidney and Liver of Rats Light and Heavy Ferritin Chain Expression in The Liver and Kidneys of Wistar Rats: Aging, Sex Differences, and Impact of Gonadectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1