Refusing to Process Voluminous Requests: Contrary to the Spirit of Freedom of Information?

Bruce Chen
{"title":"Refusing to Process Voluminous Requests: Contrary to the Spirit of Freedom of Information?","authors":"Bruce Chen","doi":"10.26180/5DB7FFDD3DB16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The power of Victorian government agencies to refuse to process voluminous Freedom of Information (‘FOI’) requests is contained in s 25A(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic). During the initial years of operation, it was claimed that this power would not be ‘antidemocratic’, ‘anti-open government’ or ‘otherwise contrary to the spirit of FOI’, given the existence of adequate safeguards and so long as agencies upheld their duties in practice. This article examines whether that has proven to be the case nearly two decades on from the provision’s introduction in 1993. It concludes that despite several conceptual difficulties, s 25A(1) has its rightful place in the FOI statutory regime.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"132-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26180/5DB7FFDD3DB16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The power of Victorian government agencies to refuse to process voluminous Freedom of Information (‘FOI’) requests is contained in s 25A(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic). During the initial years of operation, it was claimed that this power would not be ‘antidemocratic’, ‘anti-open government’ or ‘otherwise contrary to the spirit of FOI’, given the existence of adequate safeguards and so long as agencies upheld their duties in practice. This article examines whether that has proven to be the case nearly two decades on from the provision’s introduction in 1993. It concludes that despite several conceptual difficulties, s 25A(1) has its rightful place in the FOI statutory regime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拒绝处理大量请求:违背信息自由精神?
维多利亚州政府机构拒绝处理大量信息自由(FOI)请求的权力载于《1982年信息自由法》(维多利亚州)第25A(1)条。在最初几年的运作中,它声称这种权力不会“反民主”,“反开放政府”或“与信息自由精神相反”,只要存在足够的保障措施,只要机构在实践中履行其职责。本文考察了自1993年该条款出台近20年来,情况是否已被证明是如此。它的结论是,尽管存在一些概念上的困难,但第25A(1)条在《信息自由法》的法定制度中有其应有的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1