Policy and Practice in the Quality Evaluation of Kindergarten Education

Q3 Social Sciences Chinese Education and Society Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/10611932.2021.1949207
Hao Liu
{"title":"Policy and Practice in the Quality Evaluation of Kindergarten Education","authors":"Hao Liu","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2021.1949207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is a growing emphasis on accountability in the management of preschool education across the world. It has become common practice in many countries to evaluate kindergartens to monitor and ensure their quality. The Chinese government has been implementing the policy of evaluating kindergartens for 30 years. It mainly involves assessing “model (high-quality) kindergartens” and evaluating the grade of kindergartens, both of which originated in a certain historical context and perform specific functions. Changing trends may be seen in the developments of recent years: as for defining the goal of the evaluation, there has been an emphasis on evaluation as a means to improve quality; as for the management of evaluation, there has been a move from decentralization toward integration; as for the object of evaluation, there has been a move from evaluating only certain types of kindergarten to all; and evaluation has become increasingly high-stake. The analysis of 23 sets of evaluation standards issued by 18 provinces (municipalities and regions) reveals that across China the content of evaluation indicators is fairly comprehensive, the data are mainly collected at the kindergarten level rather than at individual classes, and evaluation methods are diverse and integrated. In the future, the quality evaluation of China’s kindergartens needs to become more multifaceted, accommodate more diverse subjects for evaluation, and, about the objects of evaluation, the evaluation content, and evaluation methods, it should adopt more targeted and differentiated approaches.","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"38 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2021.1949207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract There is a growing emphasis on accountability in the management of preschool education across the world. It has become common practice in many countries to evaluate kindergartens to monitor and ensure their quality. The Chinese government has been implementing the policy of evaluating kindergartens for 30 years. It mainly involves assessing “model (high-quality) kindergartens” and evaluating the grade of kindergartens, both of which originated in a certain historical context and perform specific functions. Changing trends may be seen in the developments of recent years: as for defining the goal of the evaluation, there has been an emphasis on evaluation as a means to improve quality; as for the management of evaluation, there has been a move from decentralization toward integration; as for the object of evaluation, there has been a move from evaluating only certain types of kindergarten to all; and evaluation has become increasingly high-stake. The analysis of 23 sets of evaluation standards issued by 18 provinces (municipalities and regions) reveals that across China the content of evaluation indicators is fairly comprehensive, the data are mainly collected at the kindergarten level rather than at individual classes, and evaluation methods are diverse and integrated. In the future, the quality evaluation of China’s kindergartens needs to become more multifaceted, accommodate more diverse subjects for evaluation, and, about the objects of evaluation, the evaluation content, and evaluation methods, it should adopt more targeted and differentiated approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿园教育质量评价的政策与实践
在世界范围内,学前教育管理越来越重视问责制。在许多国家,对幼儿园进行评估以监控和确保其质量已成为一种普遍做法。中国政府实施幼儿园评价政策已经30年了。主要涉及到对“模范(优质)幼儿园”的评价和对幼儿园等级的评价,两者都产生于一定的历史背景,发挥着特定的功能。在最近几年的发展中可以看到变化的趋势:在确定评价目标方面,强调评价是提高质量的一种手段;至于评价的管理,已经从权力下放走向一体化;至于评价对象,已经从只评价某些类型的幼儿园发展到全部;评估也变得越来越高风险。通过对全国18个省(市、区)发布的23套评价标准的分析发现,全国范围内评价指标的内容较为全面,数据收集主要集中在幼儿园层面而非个别班级,评价方法多样、综合。未来,中国幼儿园的质量评价需要更加多元化,评价主体更加多样化,在评价对象、评价内容、评价方法上更加有针对性、差异化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Education and Society
Chinese Education and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.
期刊最新文献
Chinese Citizen or Global Citizen? Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism at an International School in Beijing Family and Education across Social Contexts in China Parental Investment on a Socioeconomic Basis: A Comparative Study of Southeast China and Taiwan The Mediating Effects of Peer Relationship and Self-Esteem on the Relations Between Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Subjective Well-Being for High School Students The Absent Family and the Education among Contemporary Tibetan Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1