How Chinese higher education students perceive and engage in self-assessment within the Integrated Quality Assessment (IQA) system: Threats to the validity of IQA self-assessment

Tianxin Li, E. Hawe, Gavin Brown
{"title":"How Chinese higher education students perceive and engage in self-assessment within the Integrated Quality Assessment (IQA) system: Threats to the validity of IQA self-assessment","authors":"Tianxin Li, E. Hawe, Gavin Brown","doi":"10.18296/am.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Integrated Quality Assessment (IQA) in China is an officially mandated system that uses student self-assessment in addition to information provided by tests and examinations and other sources to make judgements about student achievement across a range of qualities. Officially, this system of assessment serves two purposes: to help students become more aware of their strengths and weaknesses and to provide summative scores and grades that are used to allocate scholarships and other valued outcomes. The small-scale exploratory study reported in this article investigated People’s Republic of China (PRC) students’ experiences and perceptions of IQA and self-assessment within the IQA system. Fifteen Chinese students studying at a New Zealand university who had the experience of IQA self-assessment in their undergraduate degrees participated in individual semistructured interviews. Findings highlighted how, when individuals perceived IQA self-assessment as low stakes, they went through the motions without any deep engagement, while those who perceived the same situation as high stakes did whatever was deemed necessary to achieve their goals. For this latter group of students, IQA self-assessment encouraged, reinforced, and rewarded less-than-honest and inaccurate self-evaluations, calling into question the validity of IQA and self-assessment within this system.","PeriodicalId":91054,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & development matters","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & development matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Integrated Quality Assessment (IQA) in China is an officially mandated system that uses student self-assessment in addition to information provided by tests and examinations and other sources to make judgements about student achievement across a range of qualities. Officially, this system of assessment serves two purposes: to help students become more aware of their strengths and weaknesses and to provide summative scores and grades that are used to allocate scholarships and other valued outcomes. The small-scale exploratory study reported in this article investigated People’s Republic of China (PRC) students’ experiences and perceptions of IQA and self-assessment within the IQA system. Fifteen Chinese students studying at a New Zealand university who had the experience of IQA self-assessment in their undergraduate degrees participated in individual semistructured interviews. Findings highlighted how, when individuals perceived IQA self-assessment as low stakes, they went through the motions without any deep engagement, while those who perceived the same situation as high stakes did whatever was deemed necessary to achieve their goals. For this latter group of students, IQA self-assessment encouraged, reinforced, and rewarded less-than-honest and inaccurate self-evaluations, calling into question the validity of IQA and self-assessment within this system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国高等教育学生如何看待和参与综合素质评估(IQA)体系下的自我评估:对综合素质评估(IQA)自我评估有效性的威胁
中国的综合素质评估(IQA)是一个官方授权的系统,除了通过考试和其他来源提供的信息外,还使用学生的自我评估来对学生在一系列素质方面的成就做出判断。官方的说法是,这种评估体系有两个目的:帮助学生更加了解自己的优势和劣势,并提供总结性分数和等级,用于分配奖学金和其他有价值的成果。本文报告的小规模探索性研究调查了中华人民共和国(PRC)学生对IQA的体验和感知以及IQA系统内的自我评估。15名在新西兰某大学就读的中国留学生,在本科阶段有过IQA自我评估的经历,参加了个人半结构化访谈。研究结果强调,当个体认为IQA自我评估是低风险的时候,他们会在没有深入参与的情况下走过场,而那些认为同样的情况是高风险的人会采取任何必要的措施来实现他们的目标。对于后一组学生,IQA自我评估鼓励、加强和奖励了不诚实和不准确的自我评估,这使得IQA和自我评估在这个系统中的有效性受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review Final countdown: Exploring time suspensions between lone-wolf terrorist manifestos and attacks Listen up! Reviewing the latest psychology podcasts A systematic literature review of child self-report measures of emotional wellbeing during primary to secondary school transitions Being an educational psychologist – Then and now
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1