Enhancement of Quality in Early Childhood Education : Using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale- Extension (ECERS-E) and Revised (ECRES-R) as Formative Assessment Tools for Professional Development - An Experience from Hong Kong

A. Hui, W. L. Maria L, C. Y. Priscilla S, Y. C. Jannet H, Y. H. Adith K, Y. N. Carly K
{"title":"Enhancement of Quality in Early Childhood Education : Using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale- Extension (ECERS-E) and Revised (ECRES-R) as Formative Assessment Tools for Professional Development - An Experience from Hong Kong","authors":"A. Hui, W. L. Maria L, C. Y. Priscilla S, Y. C. Jannet H, Y. H. Adith K, Y. N. Carly K","doi":"10.17206/APJRECE.2017.11.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined the reliability and applicability of the Chinese translated versions of the \nEarly Childhood Environment Rating Scale –Revised (ECERS-R) and Early Childhood Environment \nRating Scale –Extension (ECERS-E) as formative tools for use by local practitioners to perform selfevaluations \non the various aspects of the educational environments being provided to pre-school \nchildren in their own settings with the goal of helping to facilitate changes that may help to enhance \nthe quality of educational experiences for young children. Five registered kindergartens were \nrecruited and received trainings in the administration of the said tools by the PECERA-HK (ECERS) \nprofessional team. Three assessment trials were administered in three different phases. For each trial, \nteacher representatives from each kindergarten completed the assessment using the said tools together \nwith the trainers. Discussions were also held with the trainers on their observations. Internal reliability \nfor the tools was found to be quite robust. Qualitative findings also suggested that the ECERS-R and \nECERS-E can serve to assist practitioners in identifying the respective strengths and weaknesses in \nthe educational environment they were providing to children and in setting clear directions for making \ncorresponding improvements.","PeriodicalId":37367,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17206/APJRECE.2017.11.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current study examined the reliability and applicability of the Chinese translated versions of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale –Revised (ECERS-R) and Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale –Extension (ECERS-E) as formative tools for use by local practitioners to perform selfevaluations on the various aspects of the educational environments being provided to pre-school children in their own settings with the goal of helping to facilitate changes that may help to enhance the quality of educational experiences for young children. Five registered kindergartens were recruited and received trainings in the administration of the said tools by the PECERA-HK (ECERS) professional team. Three assessment trials were administered in three different phases. For each trial, teacher representatives from each kindergarten completed the assessment using the said tools together with the trainers. Discussions were also held with the trainers on their observations. Internal reliability for the tools was found to be quite robust. Qualitative findings also suggested that the ECERS-R and ECERS-E can serve to assist practitioners in identifying the respective strengths and weaknesses in the educational environment they were providing to children and in setting clear directions for making corresponding improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高幼儿教育质素:以幼儿环境评估量表扩展版(ECERS-E)及修订版(ECRES-R)作为专业发展的形成性评估工具-香港的经验
本研究考察了《幼儿环境评定量表-修订版》(ECERS-R)和《幼儿环境评定量表-扩展版》(ECERS-E)的中文译本作为形成性工具的可靠性和适用性,以供本地从业人员在自己的环境中对学龄前儿童所提供的教育环境的各个方面进行自我评估,目的是帮助促进可能有助于提高幼儿环境的变化幼儿教育经验的质量。我们招募了五所注册幼稚园,并由PECERA-HK (ECERS)的专业团队进行上述工具的使用培训。三个评估试验在三个不同的阶段进行。在每次测试中,每个幼儿园的教师代表与培训师一起使用上述工具完成评估。还与培训人员就他们的意见进行了讨论。发现这些工具的内部可靠性相当可靠。质性调查结果亦显示,ECERS-R和ECERS-E可协助从业人员识别他们为儿童提供的教育环境的长处和短处,并为作出相应的改善制订明确的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal serves as a vehicle for reporting and sharing the results of studies by early childhood education in the Pacific area. It is peer reviewed to insure that only high quality manuscripts are accepted for publication. The journal is multi-disciplinary and serves educators and other professionals concerned with the education and care of young children. It focuses primarily on research activities in the Pacific Rim area, though research reports from other areas are not excluded. The journal includes research articles related to the education and care of children from birth to age 8 and to related topics. These include reports of empirical research, reviews of research, critiques of research, and articles related to the applications of research to practice.
期刊最新文献
Hyvekasvatus varhaiskasvatushenkilöstön kokemana Imaginaries of ECEC: A comparison of policies of access in early childhood education in Brazil, Finland, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran, Nepal, and Serbia Teachers’ stress as a moderator of the impact of a professional development intervention on preschool children’s social-emotional learning Interprofessional practicum in the context of Finnish early childhood education and care Suosituksia monikielisten lasten varhaisten matemaattisten taitojen tukemiseen – Temaattinen synteesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1