Turning the Commission’s Farm to Fork Strategy into a far-reaching reform of EU agriculture

Q2 Social Sciences Derecho Animal Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI:10.5565/rev/da.521
P. Stevenson
{"title":"Turning the Commission’s Farm to Fork Strategy into a far-reaching reform of EU agriculture","authors":"P. Stevenson","doi":"10.5565/rev/da.521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the EU’s claim to lead the world on farm animal welfare, much of the EU livestock sector is industrial with poor welfare standards. Moreover, the crowded, stressful conditions of industrial livestock production contribute to the emergence, spread and amplification of pathogens, some of which are zoonotic.  Industrial production is dependent on the routine use of antimicrobials to prevent the bacterial diseases that are inevitable when animals are kept in poor conditions. This leads to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in animals which can in turn be transferred to people, so undermining the efficacy of the antimicrobials that are so important in human medicine. In order to reduce disease risk and save our antibiotics, we need to move to ‘health-oriented systems’ for rearing animals in which good health is inherent in the farming methods rather than being propped up by routine use of antimicrobials.  Industrial livestock production is also dependent on feeding human-edible cereals to animals who convert them very inefficiently into meat and milk. 57% of EU cereals are used to feed farm animals.  Industrial production’s huge demand for cereals has fuelled intensive crop production which with its monocultures and agro-chemicals has led to soil degradation, overuse and pollution of ground- and surface-water, and biodiversity loss including sharp declines in pollinators and farmland birds.  We need to transform the role of animals; they only make an efficient contribution to food security when they are converting materials we cannot consume – e.g. grass, crop residues, by-products and unavoidable food waste – into food we can eat.  We need to move to regenerative agriculture such as agroecology which can minimise the use of pesticides and fertilisers, while in some cases, enhancing productivity by supporting and harnessing natural processes.","PeriodicalId":36357,"journal":{"name":"Derecho Animal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the EU’s claim to lead the world on farm animal welfare, much of the EU livestock sector is industrial with poor welfare standards. Moreover, the crowded, stressful conditions of industrial livestock production contribute to the emergence, spread and amplification of pathogens, some of which are zoonotic.  Industrial production is dependent on the routine use of antimicrobials to prevent the bacterial diseases that are inevitable when animals are kept in poor conditions. This leads to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in animals which can in turn be transferred to people, so undermining the efficacy of the antimicrobials that are so important in human medicine. In order to reduce disease risk and save our antibiotics, we need to move to ‘health-oriented systems’ for rearing animals in which good health is inherent in the farming methods rather than being propped up by routine use of antimicrobials.  Industrial livestock production is also dependent on feeding human-edible cereals to animals who convert them very inefficiently into meat and milk. 57% of EU cereals are used to feed farm animals.  Industrial production’s huge demand for cereals has fuelled intensive crop production which with its monocultures and agro-chemicals has led to soil degradation, overuse and pollution of ground- and surface-water, and biodiversity loss including sharp declines in pollinators and farmland birds.  We need to transform the role of animals; they only make an efficient contribution to food security when they are converting materials we cannot consume – e.g. grass, crop residues, by-products and unavoidable food waste – into food we can eat.  We need to move to regenerative agriculture such as agroecology which can minimise the use of pesticides and fertilisers, while in some cases, enhancing productivity by supporting and harnessing natural processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将欧盟委员会的“从农场到餐桌”战略转变为欧盟农业的深远改革
尽管欧盟声称在农场动物福利方面领先世界,但欧盟畜牧业的大部分都是工业化的,福利标准很差。此外,工业化畜牧业生产的拥挤和紧张的条件有助于病原体的出现、传播和扩增,其中一些是人畜共患的。工业生产依赖于抗菌剂的常规使用,以预防动物在恶劣条件下饲养时不可避免的细菌性疾病。这导致动物出现抗微生物药物耐药性,而这种耐药性又可能转移给人类,从而破坏了在人类医学中如此重要的抗微生物药物的功效。为了减少疾病风险和拯救我们的抗生素,我们需要转向“以健康为导向的饲养动物系统”,在这种系统中,良好的健康是耕作方法所固有的,而不是靠常规使用抗微生物药物来支撑。工业化畜牧业生产也依赖于将人类食用的谷物喂给动物,而动物将这些谷物转化为肉和奶的效率非常低。57%的欧盟谷物被用来喂养农场动物。工业生产对谷物的巨大需求推动了集约化作物生产,而这种作物的单一栽培和农用化学品导致了土壤退化、地下水和地表水的过度使用和污染,以及生物多样性的丧失,包括传粉媒介和农田鸟类的急剧减少。我们需要改变动物的角色;只有当它们将我们无法消费的材料(如草、作物残茬、副产品和不可避免的食物浪费)转化为我们可以吃的食物时,它们才会对粮食安全做出有效贡献。我们需要转向可再生农业,如生态农业,它可以最大限度地减少农药和化肥的使用,同时在某些情况下,通过支持和利用自然过程来提高生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Derecho Animal
Derecho Animal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relaciones de vecindad y tenencia de animales. Reapertura del recurso de protección en la propiedad horizontal chilena Análisis jurídico sobre la concurrencia del ensañamiento en el delito de maltrato animal Estrategias para fortalecer el capital social y su importancia en la solución del conflicto ser humano-fauna urbana en la ciudad de Ibarra, Ecuador Francesc Ristol y Eva Doménec. Terapia Asistida con Animales. Técnicas y Ejercicios para Intervenciones Asistidas con Perros (Barcelona, 2ª ed. 2015) 390p. Reflect on the Past or on the Present? The root cause of the difficulties in advancing animal protection in China. Review of Peter J. Li’s latest work: Animal Welfare in China, Culture, Politics and Crisis, Sydney University Press 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1