041 Cognitive impairment in late onset epilepsy

Xin Zhang, A. Nikpour, R. Ahmed
{"title":"041 Cognitive impairment in late onset epilepsy","authors":"Xin Zhang, A. Nikpour, R. Ahmed","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Late onset, unprovoked epilepsy patients with cognitive impairment can have complex pathophysiology.1 Our objective was to study the characteristics and contributors of cognitive impairment in this group; and how patients with dementia could be differentiated from late onset epilepsy patients. Methods Twenty-six patients with epilepsy, onset after 50 years of age, with new cognitive complaints and 26 patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) were recruited. These participants had comprehensive neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessments. A subset of 17 participants from the Epilepsy group underwent longitudinal neuropsychological assessment. Results In the Epilepsy group, the neuropsychological profile of cognitive impairment was consistent with the foci and severity of seizure activity in 46% of participants; subcortical microvascular change in 15%; mood disturbance in 15%; medication in 15%; alcohol in 4% and AD in 4%. Compared with the Epilepsy group, the AD group had a lower Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) score (79.3±10.8 versus 87.5±6.5, p=0.01); specifically in the attention, memory and visuospatial subdomains (p=0.004, p=0.002 and p=0.02) but not fluency and language subdomains (p>0.05); and lower scores on additional assessments of naming, visuospatial and executive function (p≤ 0.001). The AD group had more abnormal metabolism in the temporal, parietal and occipital lobes than the Epilepsy group (p=0.02, p=0.006 and p=0.005). Conclusion Patients with late onset epilepsy and cognitive complaints rarely have dementia diagnosed at their first neuropsychological assessment and tend to have milder cognitive impairment than patients with AD. The two groups can be differentiated by their neuropsychological and FDG-PET profiles. Reference Sen A, Capelli V, Husain M. Cognition and dementia in older patients with epilepsy. Brain 2018;141(6):1592–1608.","PeriodicalId":19692,"journal":{"name":"Oral abstracts","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2021-anzan.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Late onset, unprovoked epilepsy patients with cognitive impairment can have complex pathophysiology.1 Our objective was to study the characteristics and contributors of cognitive impairment in this group; and how patients with dementia could be differentiated from late onset epilepsy patients. Methods Twenty-six patients with epilepsy, onset after 50 years of age, with new cognitive complaints and 26 patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) were recruited. These participants had comprehensive neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessments. A subset of 17 participants from the Epilepsy group underwent longitudinal neuropsychological assessment. Results In the Epilepsy group, the neuropsychological profile of cognitive impairment was consistent with the foci and severity of seizure activity in 46% of participants; subcortical microvascular change in 15%; mood disturbance in 15%; medication in 15%; alcohol in 4% and AD in 4%. Compared with the Epilepsy group, the AD group had a lower Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) score (79.3±10.8 versus 87.5±6.5, p=0.01); specifically in the attention, memory and visuospatial subdomains (p=0.004, p=0.002 and p=0.02) but not fluency and language subdomains (p>0.05); and lower scores on additional assessments of naming, visuospatial and executive function (p≤ 0.001). The AD group had more abnormal metabolism in the temporal, parietal and occipital lobes than the Epilepsy group (p=0.02, p=0.006 and p=0.005). Conclusion Patients with late onset epilepsy and cognitive complaints rarely have dementia diagnosed at their first neuropsychological assessment and tend to have milder cognitive impairment than patients with AD. The two groups can be differentiated by their neuropsychological and FDG-PET profiles. Reference Sen A, Capelli V, Husain M. Cognition and dementia in older patients with epilepsy. Brain 2018;141(6):1592–1608.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
041迟发性癫痫的认知障碍
目的迟发性无诱发性癫痫伴认知功能障碍患者具有复杂的病理生理我们的目标是研究这一群体的特征和认知障碍的成因;以及如何区分痴呆患者和晚发性癫痫患者。方法选取50岁以后新发认知主诉的癫痫患者26例和临床诊断为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患者26例。这些参与者进行了全面的神经心理学和神经影像学评估。癫痫组的17名参与者接受了纵向神经心理学评估。结果在癫痫组中,46%的参与者认知障碍的神经心理学特征与癫痫发作活动的病灶和严重程度一致;皮层下微血管改变15%;情绪障碍占15%;药物治疗占15%;酒精占4%,AD占4%与癫痫组比较,AD组adenbrookes Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III)评分较低(79.3±10.8比87.5±6.5,p=0.01);特别是在注意、记忆和视觉空间子领域(p=0.004, p=0.002和p=0.02),但在流利和语言子领域(p= 0.05)没有表现出来;在命名、视觉空间和执行功能的附加评估中得分较低(p≤0.001)。AD组颞叶、顶叶和枕叶代谢异常明显高于癫痫组(p=0.02, p=0.006, p=0.005)。结论迟发性癫痫伴认知疾患患者在首次神经心理评估时很少被诊断为痴呆,认知功能障碍较AD患者轻。这两组可以通过他们的神经心理学和FDG-PET谱来区分。参考文献Sen A, Capelli V, Husain M.老年癫痫患者的认知与痴呆。大脑2018;141(6):1592 - 1608。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOS4b.003 A definitional framework of advance care planning in dementia achieved a consensus in a 33-country delphi study BOS3c.001 Evaluating the impact of a virtual training programme for advance care planning facilitation in nursing homes in Singapore BOS3b.003 Utilizing simulated learning to develop non-clinical skills: a unique approach to improving advance care planning processes BOS4b.002 Advance care planning with a conversation game: a feasibility and acceptability study BOS5b.003 Attitudinal factors involved in advance directive adoption over a four-year period: evidence from a population-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1