{"title":"High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HEAL-SCS): short-term results of a randomized trial","authors":"M. Kilchukov, R. Kiselev, V. Murtazin, K. Orlov","doi":"10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Critical limb ischemia is defined as persistent ischemic pain attributed to a variety of severely compromised blood flow to affected extremities. The treatment of non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia is still challenging; the amputation rate was 9.3%, and mortality rate was 23.2% within 24 months. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become an alternative clinical practice for the treatment of intractable pain of the extremities.Aim. To determine whether high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is better than low-frequency SCS for pain relief in chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment.Methods. Throughout enrollment 56 patients were examined, of whom 6 rejected to participate in the study. The participants were randomly allocated to high-frequency (HF) or low frequency (LF)-SCS groups of 25 patients each by an external statistician, using an online tool. The patients were examined by a neurosurgeon and a vascular surgeon to assess pain intensity by visual analog scale, quality of life by short-form-36 health survey (SF-36), and functional status by walking impairment questionnaire in 3 and 12 months. Tissue perfusion by transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement was also measured in 12 months.Results. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated comparative advantage of HF-SCS over LF-SCS in 3 months with mean visual analog scale score 2.8 [95% CI, 2.4; 3.2] and 3.3 [95% CI, 3.0; 3.6] respectively (p = 0.031). Clinical superiority of HF-SCS persisted at 12 months follow up (p<0.001). HF-SCS produces significantly greater pain relief by walking impairment questionnaire in 3 (p<0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.009). Accordingly, general and mental health domains of SF-36 were significantly better in HF-SCS in 12 months. Despite a tendency toward better resting oxygen pressure in HF-SCS group, there was no intergroup difference by transcutaneous oxygen tension (p = 0.076).Conclusion. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation imposes better pain relief, life quality and functional activity in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia in short-term follow up.","PeriodicalId":19853,"journal":{"name":"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2022-2-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. Critical limb ischemia is defined as persistent ischemic pain attributed to a variety of severely compromised blood flow to affected extremities. The treatment of non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia is still challenging; the amputation rate was 9.3%, and mortality rate was 23.2% within 24 months. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become an alternative clinical practice for the treatment of intractable pain of the extremities.Aim. To determine whether high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is better than low-frequency SCS for pain relief in chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment.Methods. Throughout enrollment 56 patients were examined, of whom 6 rejected to participate in the study. The participants were randomly allocated to high-frequency (HF) or low frequency (LF)-SCS groups of 25 patients each by an external statistician, using an online tool. The patients were examined by a neurosurgeon and a vascular surgeon to assess pain intensity by visual analog scale, quality of life by short-form-36 health survey (SF-36), and functional status by walking impairment questionnaire in 3 and 12 months. Tissue perfusion by transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement was also measured in 12 months.Results. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated comparative advantage of HF-SCS over LF-SCS in 3 months with mean visual analog scale score 2.8 [95% CI, 2.4; 3.2] and 3.3 [95% CI, 3.0; 3.6] respectively (p = 0.031). Clinical superiority of HF-SCS persisted at 12 months follow up (p<0.001). HF-SCS produces significantly greater pain relief by walking impairment questionnaire in 3 (p<0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.009). Accordingly, general and mental health domains of SF-36 were significantly better in HF-SCS in 12 months. Despite a tendency toward better resting oxygen pressure in HF-SCS group, there was no intergroup difference by transcutaneous oxygen tension (p = 0.076).Conclusion. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation imposes better pain relief, life quality and functional activity in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia in short-term follow up.