Machine Learning-Based Optimization for Subsea Pipeline Route Design

S. Bhowmik
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Optimization for Subsea Pipeline Route Design","authors":"S. Bhowmik","doi":"10.4043/31031-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Optimal route selection for the subsea pipeline is a critical task for the pipeline design process, and the route selected can significantly affect the overall project cost. Therefore, it is necessary to design the routes to be economical and safe. On-bottom stability (OBS) and fixed obstacles like existing crossings and free spans are the main factors that affect the route selection. This article proposes a novel hybrid optimization method based on a typical Machine Learning algorithm for designing an optimal pipeline route. The proposed optimal route design is compared with one of the popular multi-objective optimization method named Genetic Algorithm (GA).\n The proposed pipeline route selection method uses a Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm, a particular type of machine learning method to train a pipeline system that would optimize the route selection of subsea pipelines. The route optimization tool evaluates each possible route by incorporating Onbottom stability criteria based on DNVGL-ST-109 standard and other constraints such as the minimum pipeline route length, static obstacles, pipeline crossings, and free-span section length. The cost function in the optimization method simultaneously handles the minimization of length and cost of mitigating procedures. Genetic Algorithm, a well established optimization method, has been used as a reference to compare the optimal route with the result from the proposed Reinforcement Learning based optimization method.\n Three different case studies are performed for finding the optimal route selection using the Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach considering the OBS criteria into its cost function and compared with the Genetic Algorithm (GA). The RL method saves upto 20% pipeline length for a complex problem with 15 crossings and 31 free spans. The RL optimization method provides the optimal routes, considering different aspects of the design and the costs associated with the various factors to stabilize a pipeline (mattress, trenching, burying, concrete coating, or even employing a more massive pipe with additional steel wall thickness). OBS criteria significantly influence the best route, indicating that the tool can reduce the pipeline's design time and minimize installation and operational costs of the pipeline.\n Conventionally the pipeline route optimization is performed by a manual process where the minimum roule length and static obstacles are considered to find an optimum route. The engineering is then performed to fulfill the criteria of this route, and this approach may not lead to an optimized engineering cost. The proposed Reinforced Learning method for route optimization is a mixed type, faster, and cost-efficient approach. It significantly minimizes the pipeline's installation and operational costs up to 20% of the conventional route selection process.","PeriodicalId":11072,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31031-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Optimal route selection for the subsea pipeline is a critical task for the pipeline design process, and the route selected can significantly affect the overall project cost. Therefore, it is necessary to design the routes to be economical and safe. On-bottom stability (OBS) and fixed obstacles like existing crossings and free spans are the main factors that affect the route selection. This article proposes a novel hybrid optimization method based on a typical Machine Learning algorithm for designing an optimal pipeline route. The proposed optimal route design is compared with one of the popular multi-objective optimization method named Genetic Algorithm (GA). The proposed pipeline route selection method uses a Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm, a particular type of machine learning method to train a pipeline system that would optimize the route selection of subsea pipelines. The route optimization tool evaluates each possible route by incorporating Onbottom stability criteria based on DNVGL-ST-109 standard and other constraints such as the minimum pipeline route length, static obstacles, pipeline crossings, and free-span section length. The cost function in the optimization method simultaneously handles the minimization of length and cost of mitigating procedures. Genetic Algorithm, a well established optimization method, has been used as a reference to compare the optimal route with the result from the proposed Reinforcement Learning based optimization method. Three different case studies are performed for finding the optimal route selection using the Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach considering the OBS criteria into its cost function and compared with the Genetic Algorithm (GA). The RL method saves upto 20% pipeline length for a complex problem with 15 crossings and 31 free spans. The RL optimization method provides the optimal routes, considering different aspects of the design and the costs associated with the various factors to stabilize a pipeline (mattress, trenching, burying, concrete coating, or even employing a more massive pipe with additional steel wall thickness). OBS criteria significantly influence the best route, indicating that the tool can reduce the pipeline's design time and minimize installation and operational costs of the pipeline. Conventionally the pipeline route optimization is performed by a manual process where the minimum roule length and static obstacles are considered to find an optimum route. The engineering is then performed to fulfill the criteria of this route, and this approach may not lead to an optimized engineering cost. The proposed Reinforced Learning method for route optimization is a mixed type, faster, and cost-efficient approach. It significantly minimizes the pipeline's installation and operational costs up to 20% of the conventional route selection process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的海底管道路线优化设计
海底管道的优化路径选择是管道设计过程中的一项关键任务,其路径选择对整个项目的成本影响很大。因此,有必要设计经济、安全的路线。底部稳定性和既有交叉口、自由跨度等固定障碍物是影响行车路线选择的主要因素。本文提出了一种基于典型机器学习算法的混合优化方法,用于管道路径的优化设计。将所提出的路线优化设计方法与一种流行的多目标优化方法遗传算法进行了比较。提出的管道路线选择方法使用强化学习(RL)算法,这是一种特殊类型的机器学习方法,用于训练管道系统,从而优化海底管道的路线选择。路线优化工具通过结合基于DNVGL-ST-109标准的Onbottom稳定性标准以及其他约束条件(如最小管道路线长度、静态障碍、管道交叉和自由跨度段长度)来评估每条可能的路线。优化方法中的代价函数同时处理了缓解过程的长度和代价的最小化。遗传算法是一种成熟的优化方法,并与基于强化学习的优化方法的优化结果进行了比较。采用强化学习(RL)方法,将OBS准则纳入其成本函数,并与遗传算法(GA)进行比较,进行了三个不同的案例研究,以寻找最优路线选择。对于具有15个交叉和31个自由跨的复杂问题,RL方法可节省高达20%的管道长度。RL优化方法提供了最佳路线,考虑了设计的不同方面以及与各种因素相关的成本,以稳定管道(垫层、挖沟、埋地、混凝土涂层,甚至采用更大的管道,增加钢壁厚)。OBS标准对最佳路径有显著影响,这表明该工具可以减少管道的设计时间,最大限度地降低管道的安装和运行成本。传统的管道路径优化是通过人工过程进行的,该过程考虑最小规则长度和静态障碍物来寻找最优路径。然后进行工程以满足该路线的标准,这种方法可能不会导致优化的工程成本。本文提出的强化学习方法是一种混合型、快速、经济的路径优化方法。它显著降低了管道的安装和运营成本,最高可达传统路线选择过程的20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drilling Fluids Project Engineering Guidance and Most Common Fluids Related Challenges for Deepwater and HPHT Offshore Wells Empirical Design of Optimum Frequency of Well Testing for Deepwater Operation Sustaining Oil and Gas Fields by Using Multiphase Gas Compression to Increase Production and Reserves, and Lower Operating Costs and Environmental Emissions Footprint Structural Digital Twin of FPSO for Monitoring the Hull and Topsides Based on Inspection Data and Load Measurement Application of LWD Multipole Sonic for Quantitative Cement Evaluation – Well Integrity in the Norwegian Continental Shelf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1