Evaluation of electrocardiographic repolarization parameters in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

A. Orosz, L. Szabó, A. Vagvolgyi, S. Magony, Szabolcs Nyiraty, B. Tóth, F. Pesei, GY Abraham, A. Nemes, C. Lengyel, T. Várkonyi, I. Baczkó
{"title":"Evaluation of electrocardiographic repolarization parameters in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome","authors":"A. Orosz, L. Szabó, A. Vagvolgyi, S. Magony, Szabolcs Nyiraty, B. Tóth, F. Pesei, GY Abraham, A. Nemes, C. Lengyel, T. Várkonyi, I. Baczkó","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Research, Development and Innovation Office\n \n \n \n Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifactorial, endocrine disease associated with metabolic disturbances (e.g. hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance) and increased cardiovascular risk. Recent data strongly suggest that different QT variability parameters characterizing cardiac repolarization instability represent novel markers in proarrhythmic risk assessment.\n \n \n \n In the present study we investigated ECG repolarization parameters, including QT variability parameters in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.\n \n \n \n Fifty-five PCOS patients (age: 29±6 years) and 55 age-matched healthy volunteers (age: 29±10 years) were enrolled in the study. Five-minute 12-lead resting electrocardiograms were recorded, the ECGs were digitized and evaluated off-line using the Cardiosys-A01 system (Cardiosys-A01). The following parameters were determined: the frequency corrected QT interval (QTc) using Bazett’s, Fridericia, Framingham and the Hodges formulas; QT dispersion (QTd) and T wave peak-to-end distance (Tpeak-Tend). Among QT variability parameters we analyzed the QT variance (QTv), the QT variability index (QTVI), the short-term beat-to-beat QT and RR interval variability (STV-QT, STV-RR) based on constructed Poincaré plots and the variability ratio (VR).\n \n \n \n The RR interval did not differ significantly in PCOS patients compared to controls (821±129 ms vs. 847±99 ms), however the QT interval (373±30 ms vs. 391±27 ms, p<0.01), the QTc calculated with Bazett’s, Framingham, Fridericia and Hodges correction formulas (QTc Bazett’s: 413±18 ms vs. 426±21 ms, p<0.01) and the Tpeak-Tend intervals were significantly shorter (76±10 ms vs. 83±12 ms, p<0.01). The QTd, QTv, and STV-RR did not differ significantly. However, the VR (0.3±0.4 vs. 0.2±0.2, p<0.05), the QTVI (-0,9±0.5 vs. -1,3±0.4, p<0.001), and importantly, the STV-QT were significantly higher in PCOS patients compared to controls (4.0±0.9 ms vs. 3.2±0.9 ms, p<0.0001).\n \n \n \n Some of the alterations in repolarization parameters and the significant increase in the short-term beat-to-beat QT interval variability and the QT variability index may indicate increased repolarization instability in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome compared to age-matched controls, however, further studies are needed to establish the exact relation of this finding to increased arrhythmia propensity in this population.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Research, Development and Innovation Office Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifactorial, endocrine disease associated with metabolic disturbances (e.g. hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance) and increased cardiovascular risk. Recent data strongly suggest that different QT variability parameters characterizing cardiac repolarization instability represent novel markers in proarrhythmic risk assessment. In the present study we investigated ECG repolarization parameters, including QT variability parameters in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fifty-five PCOS patients (age: 29±6 years) and 55 age-matched healthy volunteers (age: 29±10 years) were enrolled in the study. Five-minute 12-lead resting electrocardiograms were recorded, the ECGs were digitized and evaluated off-line using the Cardiosys-A01 system (Cardiosys-A01). The following parameters were determined: the frequency corrected QT interval (QTc) using Bazett’s, Fridericia, Framingham and the Hodges formulas; QT dispersion (QTd) and T wave peak-to-end distance (Tpeak-Tend). Among QT variability parameters we analyzed the QT variance (QTv), the QT variability index (QTVI), the short-term beat-to-beat QT and RR interval variability (STV-QT, STV-RR) based on constructed Poincaré plots and the variability ratio (VR). The RR interval did not differ significantly in PCOS patients compared to controls (821±129 ms vs. 847±99 ms), however the QT interval (373±30 ms vs. 391±27 ms, p<0.01), the QTc calculated with Bazett’s, Framingham, Fridericia and Hodges correction formulas (QTc Bazett’s: 413±18 ms vs. 426±21 ms, p<0.01) and the Tpeak-Tend intervals were significantly shorter (76±10 ms vs. 83±12 ms, p<0.01). The QTd, QTv, and STV-RR did not differ significantly. However, the VR (0.3±0.4 vs. 0.2±0.2, p<0.05), the QTVI (-0,9±0.5 vs. -1,3±0.4, p<0.001), and importantly, the STV-QT were significantly higher in PCOS patients compared to controls (4.0±0.9 ms vs. 3.2±0.9 ms, p<0.0001). Some of the alterations in repolarization parameters and the significant increase in the short-term beat-to-beat QT interval variability and the QT variability index may indicate increased repolarization instability in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome compared to age-matched controls, however, further studies are needed to establish the exact relation of this finding to increased arrhythmia propensity in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多囊卵巢综合征患者心电图复极参数的评价
资金来源类型:公共拨款-仅限国家预算。多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种多因素内分泌疾病,与代谢紊乱(如高胰岛素血症、胰岛素抵抗)和心血管风险增加有关。最近的数据强烈表明,不同的QT变异性参数表征心脏复极不稳定是心律失常风险评估的新指标。在本研究中,我们研究了多囊卵巢综合征患者的心电图复极参数,包括QT变异性参数。55名PCOS患者(年龄:29±6岁)和55名年龄匹配的健康志愿者(年龄:29±10岁)入组研究。记录5分钟12导联静息心电图,心电图数字化并使用Cardiosys-A01系统(Cardiosys-A01)离线评估。使用Bazett’s, Fridericia, Framingham和Hodges公式确定以下参数:频率校正QT间期(QTc);QT离散度(QTd)和T波峰端距离(Tpeak-Tend)。在QT变异性参数中,我们分析了QT方差(QTv)、QT变异性指数(QTVI)、短期搏动-搏动QT和RR间隔变异性(STV-QT, STV-RR),基于构建的poincar图和变异性比(VR)。PCOS患者的RR间期与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(821±129 ms比847±99 ms),但QT间期(373±30 ms比391±27 ms, p<0.01),用Bazett、Framingham、Fridericia和Hodges校正公式计算的QTc (QTc: 413±18 ms比426±21 ms, p<0.01)和t峰值-趋势间期(76±10 ms比83±12 ms, p<0.01)显著缩短。QTd、QTv、STV-RR无显著性差异。然而,PCOS患者的VR(0.3±0.4 vs. 0.2±0.2,p<0.05), QTVI(-0,9±0.5 vs. -1,3±0.4,p<0.001),重要的是,STV-QT显著高于对照组(4.0±0.9 ms vs. 3.2±0.9 ms, p<0.0001)。复极参数的一些改变以及短期搏动间期变异性和QT变异性指数的显著增加可能表明多囊卵巢综合征患者的复极不稳定性比年龄匹配的对照组增加,然而,需要进一步的研究来确定这一发现与该人群中心律失常倾向增加的确切关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High lead-related complication rate with MicroPort Vega active fixation pacing leads. Dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC Enhancing Origin Prediction: Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Premature Ventricular Contractions with Dual-Rhythm Analysis Focused on Cardiac Rotation A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1