A Political Time Rewritten: Revisiting the Founding Year of the Khitan Empire

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Chinese Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1163/23521341-12340143
Runbo Miao (苗潤博)
{"title":"A Political Time Rewritten: Revisiting the Founding Year of the Khitan Empire","authors":"Runbo Miao (苗潤博)","doi":"10.1163/23521341-12340143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMaterials dating from the Liao dynasty usually record the founding year of the Khitan Empire as 907; this was done deliberately, rather than it being caused by the negligence of historians. The official history records of the Khitan Empire contain two completely different narratives of the founding year: the account of “Junji Taiyi deity Repeatedly Appearing” from the “Biography of Taizu” in Liaoshi reflects the original appearance of the history of the empire foundation period in the first year of the Shence era (916). Other records were reworded by later historians, which caused the contents of these originally clear records to become completely blurred and concealed. This rewriting process may have been completed in the thirteenth year of the Zhongxi era (1044) during Emperor Xingzong’s reign; the records advance Emperor Taizu’s rise to the throne to the year that the Tang dynasty was destroyed. That year was essential in reconstructing the founding history of the Khitan Empire and a narrative showed a strong tendency to orthodoxy in the late Liao dynasty. This article offers further reflection on the portrayal of a political epoch in historical records from a dynamic and productive angle.","PeriodicalId":37097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Materials dating from the Liao dynasty usually record the founding year of the Khitan Empire as 907; this was done deliberately, rather than it being caused by the negligence of historians. The official history records of the Khitan Empire contain two completely different narratives of the founding year: the account of “Junji Taiyi deity Repeatedly Appearing” from the “Biography of Taizu” in Liaoshi reflects the original appearance of the history of the empire foundation period in the first year of the Shence era (916). Other records were reworded by later historians, which caused the contents of these originally clear records to become completely blurred and concealed. This rewriting process may have been completed in the thirteenth year of the Zhongxi era (1044) during Emperor Xingzong’s reign; the records advance Emperor Taizu’s rise to the throne to the year that the Tang dynasty was destroyed. That year was essential in reconstructing the founding history of the Khitan Empire and a narrative showed a strong tendency to orthodoxy in the late Liao dynasty. This article offers further reflection on the portrayal of a political epoch in historical records from a dynamic and productive angle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个被改写的政治时代:契丹帝国建国年重访
辽代的资料通常将契丹帝国的建立年份记录为907年;这是故意的,而不是历史学家的疏忽造成的。契丹帝国的正史记载中有两种完全不同的建国年份叙述:辽史《太祖传》中“君基太一神连连现身”的记载,反映的是神元年(916年)帝国建国时期历史的原貌。其他记录被后来的历史学家改写,导致这些原本清晰的记录内容变得完全模糊和隐藏。这一改写过程可能在中行宗十三年(1044年)完成;这些记录将太祖登基的时间提前到了唐朝灭亡的那一年。这一年是重构契丹帝国建国史的关键一年,辽代末年的叙事呈现出强烈的正统化倾向。本文从动态的、生产性的角度对史书中对一个政治时代的刻画进行了进一步的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Humanities
Journal of Chinese Humanities Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Introduction: a New Discussion on Chinese Literature On a Far-Off Journey – a Commentary on the “History of Literary Culture” Approach in The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature Is a New Chinese Literary History Possible? A Critical Investigation of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature Musings on Literary History Research: The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature as a Case Study The Revealed and the Hidden: a Reading of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1