From ‘pure Satisfaction and Curiosity’ to the ‘particular gain or loss upon each article’: early modern philosophies of accounting in English accounting textbooks

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Accounting History Review Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598
Pierre D. Gervais
{"title":"From ‘pure Satisfaction and Curiosity’ to the ‘particular gain or loss upon each article’: early modern philosophies of accounting in English accounting textbooks","authors":"Pierre D. Gervais","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Beginning with a periodisation of a set of 45 textbooks published in English between 1547 and 1799, and analysed by J. R. Edwards, Graeme Dean, and Frank Clarke in 2009, the study shows that in this sample, a significant shift took place in the use of managerial references between the seventeenth and the eighteenth century. Moreover, within the second period, the qualitative analysis of a sub-sample of five of these textbooks indicates that these references appeared within different epistemological contexts, not all of them business-related. Early in the 1700s, accounting techniques were presented at first as tools of self-discovery and temperance. Textbooks from the mid-eighteenth century increasingly referred to the pursuit of scientific knowledge, maybe under the influence of the Enlightenment, while late-eighteenth-century authors started to develop a business-oriented epistemology.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"263 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2020.1813598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Beginning with a periodisation of a set of 45 textbooks published in English between 1547 and 1799, and analysed by J. R. Edwards, Graeme Dean, and Frank Clarke in 2009, the study shows that in this sample, a significant shift took place in the use of managerial references between the seventeenth and the eighteenth century. Moreover, within the second period, the qualitative analysis of a sub-sample of five of these textbooks indicates that these references appeared within different epistemological contexts, not all of them business-related. Early in the 1700s, accounting techniques were presented at first as tools of self-discovery and temperance. Textbooks from the mid-eighteenth century increasingly referred to the pursuit of scientific knowledge, maybe under the influence of the Enlightenment, while late-eighteenth-century authors started to develop a business-oriented epistemology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“纯粹的满足和好奇心”到“每篇文章的特定收益或损失”:英语会计教科书中的早期现代会计哲学
从1547年至1799年间出版的45本英语教科书的分期开始,并由j·r·爱德华兹,格雷姆·迪恩和弗兰克·克拉克在2009年进行分析,该研究表明,在这个样本中,17世纪和18世纪之间管理参考文献的使用发生了重大转变。此外,在第二阶段,对其中五本教科书的子样本进行定性分析表明,这些参考文献出现在不同的认识论语境中,并非所有都与商业相关。早在18世纪初,会计技术最初被视为自我发现和节制的工具。也许是在启蒙运动的影响下,18世纪中期的教科书越来越多地提到对科学知识的追求,而18世纪晚期的作者开始发展一种以商业为导向的认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Accounting for sustainability in water supply: the case of the ‘Bottini Aqueduct’ in medieval times ‘American Bookkeeping’ in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries which was not American ‘Accounting for the Music’. Institutional logics in the Regio Teatro Carolino of Palermo at the beginning of the nineteenth century Reflections from the Editor’s Desk Measuring profit and performance, a cautionary tale: Birmingham Small Arms c.1911–c.1936
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1