Characterization of metalworking fluid aerosols in bearing grinding operations.

F. Rosenthal, B. L. Yeagy
{"title":"Characterization of metalworking fluid aerosols in bearing grinding operations.","authors":"F. Rosenthal, B. L. Yeagy","doi":"10.1080/15298660108984640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concentrations and size distribution of metalworking fluid aerosols were investigated in grinding operations in the bearing manufacturing industry. Fifteen paired open- and closed-face cassette samples and five cascade impactor samples were obtained in each of three types of grinding machinery (face, microcentric, and progressive). Aerosol mass concentration as measured by open-face filter sampling ranged from 0.34 to 2.43 mg/m3. As measured by closed-face sampling the range was 0.14 to 2.01 mg/m3. For each grinding process, open-face concentration was significantly higher than the closed-face concentration (paired t-test, p <0.05). Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) ranged from 3.33 to 6.26 microm. The percentage of mass greater than 9 microm ranged from 8.0 to 45.3. The MMAD and fraction greater than 9 microm were significantly greater for the aerosol produced by the face grinder compared with the other two processes. The results indicate that (1) closed-face sampling results in a lower aerosol mass concentration, as compared with open-face sampling, with the degree of difference being somewhat dependent on grinding process; and (2) the particle size distribution and concentration of metalworking fluid aerosols may vary with the type of grinding operation sampled.","PeriodicalId":7449,"journal":{"name":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The concentrations and size distribution of metalworking fluid aerosols were investigated in grinding operations in the bearing manufacturing industry. Fifteen paired open- and closed-face cassette samples and five cascade impactor samples were obtained in each of three types of grinding machinery (face, microcentric, and progressive). Aerosol mass concentration as measured by open-face filter sampling ranged from 0.34 to 2.43 mg/m3. As measured by closed-face sampling the range was 0.14 to 2.01 mg/m3. For each grinding process, open-face concentration was significantly higher than the closed-face concentration (paired t-test, p <0.05). Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) ranged from 3.33 to 6.26 microm. The percentage of mass greater than 9 microm ranged from 8.0 to 45.3. The MMAD and fraction greater than 9 microm were significantly greater for the aerosol produced by the face grinder compared with the other two processes. The results indicate that (1) closed-face sampling results in a lower aerosol mass concentration, as compared with open-face sampling, with the degree of difference being somewhat dependent on grinding process; and (2) the particle size distribution and concentration of metalworking fluid aerosols may vary with the type of grinding operation sampled.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轴承磨削作业中金属加工流体气溶胶的表征。
研究了轴承制造业磨削过程中金属加工液气溶胶的浓度和粒径分布。在三种类型的磨削机械(面磨、微心磨和渐进磨)中分别获得了15个成对的开式和闭式箱体样品和5个级联冲击器样品。采用露天过滤器取样测量的气溶胶质量浓度范围为0.34 ~ 2.43 mg/m3。闭式采样测量的范围为0.14 ~ 2.01 mg/m3。各磨矿工艺中,露天磨矿浓度显著高于封闭式磨矿浓度(配对t检验,p <0.05)。空气动力质量中值直径(MMAD)为3.33 ~ 6.26微米。大于9微米的质量百分率为8.0 ~ 45.3。与其他两种工艺相比,平面磨床产生的气溶胶的MMAD和大于9微米的分数显著大于其他两种工艺。结果表明:(1)与露天取样相比,封闭式取样的气溶胶质量浓度较低,差异程度与磨削工艺有关;(2)金属加工液气溶胶的粒径分布和浓度可能随取样的磨削操作类型而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches and considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants: report of recent symposia. Approach to setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants in The Netherlands. The origin of a nicotine detection method. Telephone communications with several commercial respirators. Replotting data for chronic beryllium disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1