A proposal for WS-Agreement Negotiation

Dominic Battré, F. Brazier, K. Clark, M. Oey, A. Papaspyrou, Oliver Wäldrich, P. Wieder, W. Ziegler
{"title":"A proposal for WS-Agreement Negotiation","authors":"Dominic Battré, F. Brazier, K. Clark, M. Oey, A. Papaspyrou, Oliver Wäldrich, P. Wieder, W. Ziegler","doi":"10.1109/GRID.2010.5697976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Web Services Agreement specification defines a normative language to formulate Service Level Agreements and a basic protocol to expose service-level descriptions, validate service-level requests, and come to an agreement. This protocol, often called “take-it-or-leave-it”, allows a service provider and a service consumer to decide whether to accept or reject a service offer. Although this approach is sufficient for a number of use cases, others exist with requirements for multi-step negotiation or the adaptation of an existing agreement. In this paper, we describe the Web Services Agreement Negotiation protocol, a proposal by the Open Grid Forum to extend the existing specification. This proposal is the result of combining various research activities that have been conducted to define protocols for negotiating service levels or to supersede the existing “take-it-or-leave-it” protocol. The main characteristics of this proposal are the multi-round negotiation capability, renegotiation capability, and compliance with the original specification.","PeriodicalId":6372,"journal":{"name":"2010 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 11th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GRID.2010.5697976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

The Web Services Agreement specification defines a normative language to formulate Service Level Agreements and a basic protocol to expose service-level descriptions, validate service-level requests, and come to an agreement. This protocol, often called “take-it-or-leave-it”, allows a service provider and a service consumer to decide whether to accept or reject a service offer. Although this approach is sufficient for a number of use cases, others exist with requirements for multi-step negotiation or the adaptation of an existing agreement. In this paper, we describe the Web Services Agreement Negotiation protocol, a proposal by the Open Grid Forum to extend the existing specification. This proposal is the result of combining various research activities that have been conducted to define protocols for negotiating service levels or to supersede the existing “take-it-or-leave-it” protocol. The main characteristics of this proposal are the multi-round negotiation capability, renegotiation capability, and compliance with the original specification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WS-Agreement协商的建议
Web服务协议规范定义了一种规范语言来制定服务水平协议,并定义了一个基本协议来公开服务水平描述、验证服务水平请求并达成协议。该协议通常被称为“接受或放弃”,它允许服务提供者和服务消费者决定是否接受或拒绝服务提供。尽管这种方法对于许多用例来说是足够的,但是对于多步骤协商或对现有协议的适应的需求,还存在其他的用例。在本文中,我们描述了Web服务协议协商协议,这是一个由开放网格论坛提出的扩展现有规范的提议。这项建议是综合各种研究活动的结果,这些活动是为了确定谈判服务水平的协议或取代现有的“接受或放弃”协议而进行的。该方案的主要特点是具有多轮协商能力、再协商能力和对原规范的遵从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On allocation policies for power and performance Adaptively detecting changes in Autonomic Grid Computing Cost-driven scheduling of grid workflows using Partial Critical Paths On the impact of monitoring router energy consumption for greening the Internet SLA compliance monitoring through semantic processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1