Aortic root systolic excursion and its association with exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

R. Mahfouz, M. Gad, M. Arab, Mohei Abulfoutoh
{"title":"Aortic root systolic excursion and its association with exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction","authors":"R. Mahfouz, M. Gad, M. Arab, Mohei Abulfoutoh","doi":"10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between aortic root systolic excursion (ARSE) as a simple echocardiographic parameter and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: Eighty patients (mean age 57.9±10.5years) with HFpEF were compared with 80 with age and sex matched healthy subjects. Transthorathic echocardiography was performed with specific assessment of aortic root systolic excursion. Left ventricular longitudinal (LVGLS) and circumferential strain (LVGCS) were evaluated with speckle tracking imaging. In addition all participates underwent 6minute walking test (6MWT). Results: ARSE was reduced in subject with HFpEF compared with controls (p<0.05). Furthermore, HFpEF patients with 6MWTD<300m had pronounced decrease in ARSE compared with those with 6MWTD≥300m and control subjects (p<0.001). 6MWTD was correlated with ARSE (p<0.001), LVGLS (p<0.001) and LVGCS (p<0.01). ARSE had significant correlation with LVGLS (p<0.001) and LVGCS (p<0.003). Moreover, ARSE correlated negatively with LAVI (r =-0.438, p<0.001), E/e’ ratio (r =- 0.349, p<0.01). After multivariate analysis ARSE remained a strong independent predictor of exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF (p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that ARSE ≤7.5mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict reduced exercise intolerance in HFpEF patients (AUC=0.91; p<0.001). Conclusion: We found that, patients with HFpEF have reduced ARSE, which was significantly associated reduced 6MWTD. Reduced ARSE was correlated with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction. We suggest that ARSE, as a simple echocardiographic parameter might be of value, in order to better discriminate HFpEF patients risk profile.","PeriodicalId":15200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between aortic root systolic excursion (ARSE) as a simple echocardiographic parameter and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: Eighty patients (mean age 57.9±10.5years) with HFpEF were compared with 80 with age and sex matched healthy subjects. Transthorathic echocardiography was performed with specific assessment of aortic root systolic excursion. Left ventricular longitudinal (LVGLS) and circumferential strain (LVGCS) were evaluated with speckle tracking imaging. In addition all participates underwent 6minute walking test (6MWT). Results: ARSE was reduced in subject with HFpEF compared with controls (p<0.05). Furthermore, HFpEF patients with 6MWTD<300m had pronounced decrease in ARSE compared with those with 6MWTD≥300m and control subjects (p<0.001). 6MWTD was correlated with ARSE (p<0.001), LVGLS (p<0.001) and LVGCS (p<0.01). ARSE had significant correlation with LVGLS (p<0.001) and LVGCS (p<0.003). Moreover, ARSE correlated negatively with LAVI (r =-0.438, p<0.001), E/e’ ratio (r =- 0.349, p<0.01). After multivariate analysis ARSE remained a strong independent predictor of exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF (p<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that ARSE ≤7.5mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict reduced exercise intolerance in HFpEF patients (AUC=0.91; p<0.001). Conclusion: We found that, patients with HFpEF have reduced ARSE, which was significantly associated reduced 6MWTD. Reduced ARSE was correlated with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction. We suggest that ARSE, as a simple echocardiographic parameter might be of value, in order to better discriminate HFpEF patients risk profile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者主动脉根收缩偏移及其与运动耐量的关系
目的:我们旨在探讨主动脉根收缩偏移(ARSE)作为一个简单的超声心动图参数与保留射血分数(HFpEF)心力衰竭患者运动耐量之间的关系。方法:80例HFpEF患者(平均年龄57.9±10.5岁)与80例年龄、性别匹配的健康人进行比较。经胸超声心动图进行具体评估主动脉根收缩偏移。采用散斑跟踪成像评价左室纵向应变(LVGLS)和周向应变(LVGCS)。此外,所有参与者进行6分钟步行测试(6MWT)。结果:与对照组相比,HFpEF组患者的ass明显降低(p<0.05)。此外,6MWTD<300m的HFpEF患者与6MWTD≥300m的患者和对照组相比,其ARSE明显降低(p<0.001)。6MWTD与ARSE (p<0.001)、LVGLS (p<0.001)、LVGCS (p<0.01)相关。与LVGLS (p<0.001)、LVGCS (p<0.003)有显著相关性。此外,ass与LAVI呈负相关(r =-0.438, p<0.001), E/ E′比呈负相关(r =- 0.349, p<0.01)。多变量分析后,ass仍然是HFpEF患者运动耐量的一个强有力的独立预测因子(p<0.001)。ROC分析显示,髋部≤7.5mm是预测HFpEF患者运动不耐受降低的最佳临界值(AUC=0.91;p < 0.001)。结论:我们发现HFpEF患者的ARSE降低,与6MWTD降低显著相关。降低的ARSE与亚临床左室收缩功能障碍和舒张功能障碍相关。我们认为,作为一个简单的超声心动图参数,为了更好地区分HFpEF患者的风险特征,ARSE可能是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of delirium in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery AL amyloidosis masquerading as cardiac syncope: a case report Etiological profile of acute pericarditis at the Yalgado-Ouedraogo university hospital in Ouagadougou at Burkina Faso Pilot experience with VV ECLS in a single hospital in a developing nation COVID 19 infection requiring ECMO support after Fontan operation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1