Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict BHA Walk Tendencies

C. Noshi
{"title":"Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict BHA Walk Tendencies","authors":"C. Noshi","doi":"10.2118/195111-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Directional drillers have faced numerous challenges due to the right and left BHA walk tendencies. Walk, build, and drop tendencies increase sliding time thus reducing ROP and increasing CPF. Drilling tortuous wellbores are more prone to NPT, increased torque and downhole drag. It was noted that bit side forces and the tilt angle influence the DLS of the wellbore. In this study, novel predictive analytic models were developed to understand the factors that influence BHA assembly walk tendency as well as uncover the hidden relationships between several different features influencing the walk tendencies. Sixty-eight wells are included in this study with an initial model training and testing being executed on eight wells. A blind test was later performed on 57 wells with 149 different BHAs. The model accounted for the number and locations of the various components in the BHA and their different types. The modified BHAs are assumed to be a continuous beam supported by PDC bits, PDM, stabilizers, and an assembly, mirroring the contact points of the BHAs, and the wellbore. For simplification purposes, the assembly assumes that all three components are made of non-magnetic material with comparable OD, linear weight, and material. The assembly was based on the fact that these components had the same bending stiffness due to similar material and thus elasticity.\n Seven different ML models were experimented with to determine the lowest MAE. They included Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, Artificial Neural Networks, and Adaboost. The attributes included mud density and formation type. Bit variables were composed of: OD, gauge length, length of inner and outer profile, TFA, manufacture, cutter size, and blade count. For PDM: location, OD, LW, length, bit to bend distance, and bend angle. The stabilizer included location, blade count, gauge length, gauge OD, LW, and stabilizer to bit depth and assembly specifications. Moreover, hole size, block height, hookload, WOB, ROP, differential pressure, mud flow rate, SPP, GR, Annular pressure loss, MSE, ECD at Bit, Bit RPM, Bit TOR, and bit aggressivity. The survey data had MD, Inclination, azimuth, and finally DLS.\n The models showed that the side forces in the form of seven dominant factors were the main culprits in influencing the walk direction of the drill bit. There was a highly significant relationship with a MAE of 14.7% between stabilizer location, gauge OD, PDM bit to bend distance, bit gauge, PDM differential pressure, ROP, WOB, inclination, and Hookload.\n These results prove to be a great advantage in controlling the drilling direction and reaching the target zone in minimal time. The optimized machine learning model helped optimize rotatory drilling time, ROP, smoother wellbores, and Lower CPF overall.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195111-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Directional drillers have faced numerous challenges due to the right and left BHA walk tendencies. Walk, build, and drop tendencies increase sliding time thus reducing ROP and increasing CPF. Drilling tortuous wellbores are more prone to NPT, increased torque and downhole drag. It was noted that bit side forces and the tilt angle influence the DLS of the wellbore. In this study, novel predictive analytic models were developed to understand the factors that influence BHA assembly walk tendency as well as uncover the hidden relationships between several different features influencing the walk tendencies. Sixty-eight wells are included in this study with an initial model training and testing being executed on eight wells. A blind test was later performed on 57 wells with 149 different BHAs. The model accounted for the number and locations of the various components in the BHA and their different types. The modified BHAs are assumed to be a continuous beam supported by PDC bits, PDM, stabilizers, and an assembly, mirroring the contact points of the BHAs, and the wellbore. For simplification purposes, the assembly assumes that all three components are made of non-magnetic material with comparable OD, linear weight, and material. The assembly was based on the fact that these components had the same bending stiffness due to similar material and thus elasticity. Seven different ML models were experimented with to determine the lowest MAE. They included Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, Artificial Neural Networks, and Adaboost. The attributes included mud density and formation type. Bit variables were composed of: OD, gauge length, length of inner and outer profile, TFA, manufacture, cutter size, and blade count. For PDM: location, OD, LW, length, bit to bend distance, and bend angle. The stabilizer included location, blade count, gauge length, gauge OD, LW, and stabilizer to bit depth and assembly specifications. Moreover, hole size, block height, hookload, WOB, ROP, differential pressure, mud flow rate, SPP, GR, Annular pressure loss, MSE, ECD at Bit, Bit RPM, Bit TOR, and bit aggressivity. The survey data had MD, Inclination, azimuth, and finally DLS. The models showed that the side forces in the form of seven dominant factors were the main culprits in influencing the walk direction of the drill bit. There was a highly significant relationship with a MAE of 14.7% between stabilizer location, gauge OD, PDM bit to bend distance, bit gauge, PDM differential pressure, ROP, WOB, inclination, and Hookload. These results prove to be a great advantage in controlling the drilling direction and reaching the target zone in minimal time. The optimized machine learning model helped optimize rotatory drilling time, ROP, smoother wellbores, and Lower CPF overall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用监督机器学习算法预测钻具组合行走趋势
由于左右钻具组合的行走趋势,定向钻井人员面临着许多挑战。行走、构建和掉落倾向会增加滑动时间,从而降低ROP并增加CPF。在弯曲井中钻井更容易发生NPT、扭矩和井下阻力增加。注意到钻头侧力和倾斜角度影响井筒的DLS。在本研究中,建立了新的预测分析模型,以了解影响BHA组合行走趋势的因素,并揭示影响行走趋势的几种不同特征之间的隐藏关系。该研究包括68口井,其中8口井进行了初始模型训练和测试。随后,对57口井、149口不同的bha进行了盲测。该模型考虑了底部钻具组合中各种组件的数量和位置以及它们的不同类型。改进后的bha被认为是由PDC钻头、PDM、稳定器和一个组合支撑的连续光束,反映了bha与井筒的接触点。为简化起见,装配假定所有三个组件都由外径、线性重量和材料相当的非磁性材料制成。装配是基于这样一个事实,即这些组件具有相同的弯曲刚度,由于相似的材料和弹性。7种不同的ML模型进行实验,以确定最低MAE。它们包括梯度增强机、随机森林、人工神经网络和Adaboost。这些属性包括泥浆密度和地层类型。钻头变量包括:外径、规格长度、内外轮廓长度、TFA、制造、刀具尺寸和刀片数量。对于PDM:位置,外径,LW,长度,钻头到弯曲距离,弯曲角度。稳定器包括位置、叶片数量、压力表长度、压力表外径、LW、稳定器与钻头深度和装配规格。此外,井眼尺寸、区块高度、钩载、钻压、ROP、压差、泥浆流速、SPP、GR、环空压力损失、MSE、钻头ECD、钻头RPM、钻头TOR和钻头侵略性。测量数据有MD,倾角,方位角,最后是DLS。模型表明,侧力以7种主导因素的形式存在,是影响钻头行走方向的主要因素。稳定器位置、表外径、PDM钻头与弯曲距离、钻头尺寸、PDM压差、ROP、WOB、倾角和Hookload之间的MAE关系非常显著,为14.7%。这些结果在控制钻井方向和在最短时间内到达目标区方面具有很大的优势。优化后的机器学习模型有助于优化旋转钻井时间、机械钻速、更平滑的井眼,并降低CPF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laser Gun: The Next Perforation Technology High-Order Accurate Method for Solving the Anisotropic Eikonal Equation Recognizing Abnormal Shock Signatures During Drilling with Help of Machine Learning Optimizing Field Scale Polymer Development in Strong Aquifer Fields in the South of the Sultanate of Oman Experimental Study to Estimate CO2 Solubility in a High Pressure High Temperature HPHT Reservoir Carbonate Aquifer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1