The Best Scenario for Geostatistical Modeling of Porosity in the Sarvak Reservoir in an Iranian Oil Field, Using Electrofacies, Seismic Facies, and Seismic Attributes
{"title":"The Best Scenario for Geostatistical Modeling of Porosity in the Sarvak Reservoir in an Iranian Oil Field, Using Electrofacies, Seismic Facies, and Seismic Attributes","authors":"V. Mehdipour, A. Rabbani, A. Kadkhodaie","doi":"10.2118/217428-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The lateral and vertical variations in porosity significantly impact the reservoir quality and the volumetric calculations in heterogeneous reservoirs. With a case study from Iran’s Zagros Basin Sarvak reservoir in the Dezful Embayment, this paper aims to demonstrate an efficient methodology for distributing porosity. Four facies models (based on electrofacies analysis data and seismic facies) with different geostatistical algorithms were used to examine the effect of different facies types on porosity propagation. Both deterministic and stochastic methods are adopted to check the impact of geostatistical algorithms on porosity modeling in the static model. A total of 40 scenarios were run and validated for porosity distribution through a blind test procedure to check the reliability of the models. The study’s findings revealed high correlation values in the blind test data for all porosity realizations linked to seismic facies, ranging from 0.778 to 0.876. In addition, co-kriging to acoustic impedance (AI), as a secondary variable, increases the correlation coefficient in all related cases. Unlike deterministic algorithms, using stochastic methods reduces the uncertainty and causes the porosity model to have an identical histogram compared with the original data. This study introduced a comprehensive workflow for porosity distribution in the studied carbonate Sarvak reservoir, considering the electrofacies, and seismic facies, and applying different geostatistical algorithms. As a result, based on this workflow, simultaneously linking the porosity distribution to seismic facies, co-kriging to AI, and applying the sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) algorithm result in the best spatial modeling of porosity.","PeriodicalId":22066,"journal":{"name":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217428-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The lateral and vertical variations in porosity significantly impact the reservoir quality and the volumetric calculations in heterogeneous reservoirs. With a case study from Iran’s Zagros Basin Sarvak reservoir in the Dezful Embayment, this paper aims to demonstrate an efficient methodology for distributing porosity. Four facies models (based on electrofacies analysis data and seismic facies) with different geostatistical algorithms were used to examine the effect of different facies types on porosity propagation. Both deterministic and stochastic methods are adopted to check the impact of geostatistical algorithms on porosity modeling in the static model. A total of 40 scenarios were run and validated for porosity distribution through a blind test procedure to check the reliability of the models. The study’s findings revealed high correlation values in the blind test data for all porosity realizations linked to seismic facies, ranging from 0.778 to 0.876. In addition, co-kriging to acoustic impedance (AI), as a secondary variable, increases the correlation coefficient in all related cases. Unlike deterministic algorithms, using stochastic methods reduces the uncertainty and causes the porosity model to have an identical histogram compared with the original data. This study introduced a comprehensive workflow for porosity distribution in the studied carbonate Sarvak reservoir, considering the electrofacies, and seismic facies, and applying different geostatistical algorithms. As a result, based on this workflow, simultaneously linking the porosity distribution to seismic facies, co-kriging to AI, and applying the sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) algorithm result in the best spatial modeling of porosity.
期刊介绍:
Covers the application of a wide range of topics, including reservoir characterization, geology and geophysics, core analysis, well logging, well testing, reservoir management, enhanced oil recovery, fluid mechanics, performance prediction, reservoir simulation, digital energy, uncertainty/risk assessment, information management, resource and reserve evaluation, portfolio/asset management, project valuation, and petroleum economics.