The Simplest Chronoscope IV: Lateral Differences in Choice Reaction Time Responses Obtained by Meterstick versus Machine

A. Montare
{"title":"The Simplest Chronoscope IV: Lateral Differences in Choice Reaction Time Responses Obtained by Meterstick versus Machine","authors":"A. Montare","doi":"10.2466/27.CP.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study compared right-hand and left-hand two-choice CRT responses of college students to both the simplest chronoscope (a falling meterstick) and to a digital-readout multi-choice reaction timer (machine). Tests of ipsilateral differences showed significant differences in CRT between the meterstick and the machine methods for both right and left hands. There were no significant contralateral differences in CRT with either the meterstick or machine methods. Combined total scores showed that there were significant differences in CRT responses obtained by meterstick versus machine, whereas there were no differences in CRT responses for all right-hand responses versus all left-hand responses. Results suggest that perhaps the workings of two different reaction time systems may account for the robustness of differences between CRT's obtained by meterstick versus machine.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2466/27.CP.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study compared right-hand and left-hand two-choice CRT responses of college students to both the simplest chronoscope (a falling meterstick) and to a digital-readout multi-choice reaction timer (machine). Tests of ipsilateral differences showed significant differences in CRT between the meterstick and the machine methods for both right and left hands. There were no significant contralateral differences in CRT with either the meterstick or machine methods. Combined total scores showed that there were significant differences in CRT responses obtained by meterstick versus machine, whereas there were no differences in CRT responses for all right-hand responses versus all left-hand responses. Results suggest that perhaps the workings of two different reaction time systems may account for the robustness of differences between CRT's obtained by meterstick versus machine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最简单计时镜IV:计量尺与机器在选择反应时间反应上的横向差异
摘要:本研究比较了大学生对最简单的计时器(落下的米尺)和数字读出多选择反应计时器(机器)的左手和右手两种选择CRT的反应。同侧差异测试显示,右手和左手的尺法和机器法在CRT上存在显著差异。尺法与机法对侧CRT无明显差异。综合总分显示,米尺法和机器法获得的CRT反应有显著差异,而所有右手反应和所有左手反应的CRT反应没有差异。结果表明,也许两种不同的反应时间系统的工作原理可以解释米尺和机器获得的CRT之间的稳健性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Dissonance within the social self: exploring the effects of norm conflict between ingroups Receiving forgiveness in the presence of an attentive audience Would you like some coffee with your sugar? A natural field experiment on the efficiency and acceptability of setting zero sugars as a default in coffee-vending machines Weakening the ideological immune system: can debiasing techniques reduce confirmation bias? Prediction of dishonest behavior using the CNI model of moral dilemma judgment: a registered report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1