Problem-Solving Multiple-Response Tests: Guessing is not a Favourable Strategy

P. Photopoulos, D. Triantis
{"title":"Problem-Solving Multiple-Response Tests: Guessing is not a Favourable Strategy","authors":"P. Photopoulos, D. Triantis","doi":"10.18178/ijlt.8.1.64-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This publication proposes an objective examination format for assessing students' ability to solve problems in Analogue Electronics. It suggests that a problem asking more than one question can take the form of a Problem-Based Multiple-Response (PBMR) item. Depending on the inter-relationship between the questions addressed in the stem, this paper identifies four types of items and suggests a scoring rule for each one of them. Issues related to the time slot given per item are also discussed. Examination results show that both the facility (F.I) and the discrimination (D.I) indices improve, and much guesswork is discarded whenever the scoring of an item considers the inter-relationship between the questions addressed in the stem. PBMR items addressing two or more fully inter-related questions are more suitable for testing the students' ability to solve problems when an objective examination is desirable. Such problem items give a more realistic picture of the student's actual knowledge.","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.8.1.64-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This publication proposes an objective examination format for assessing students' ability to solve problems in Analogue Electronics. It suggests that a problem asking more than one question can take the form of a Problem-Based Multiple-Response (PBMR) item. Depending on the inter-relationship between the questions addressed in the stem, this paper identifies four types of items and suggests a scoring rule for each one of them. Issues related to the time slot given per item are also discussed. Examination results show that both the facility (F.I) and the discrimination (D.I) indices improve, and much guesswork is discarded whenever the scoring of an item considers the inter-relationship between the questions addressed in the stem. PBMR items addressing two or more fully inter-related questions are more suitable for testing the students' ability to solve problems when an objective examination is desirable. Such problem items give a more realistic picture of the student's actual knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决问题的多重反应测试:猜测不是一个有利的策略
本出版物提出了一种客观的考试形式来评估学生解决模拟电子学问题的能力。它建议一个提问多个问题的问题可以采用基于问题的多重回答(PBMR)项目的形式。根据问题之间的相互关系,本文确定了四种类型的项目,并为每一种项目提出了评分规则。还讨论了与每个项目给出的时间间隔有关的问题。测试结果表明,设施(F.I)和辨别(D.I)指标都有所提高,只要一个项目的评分考虑了系统中所处理的问题之间的相互关系,就会丢弃许多猜测。PBMR项目涉及两个或两个以上完全相互关联的问题,在需要客观考试的情况下,更适合测试学生解决问题的能力。这样的题目能更真实地反映学生的实际知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarity of read outline discussion evaluation models to improve students' communication skills Algerian dialect, a sine qua non to learning standard Arabic Perpetuating inclusive education amidst the affiliative leadership style: Challenges and potentials Comparing competitive team-based learning with other instructional methods and approaches Teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of the “No child left behind policy”: Basis for framework enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1