Geobody Interpretation and Its Application for Field Development

A. Olaniyi, Mora-Glukstad I. Miguel, Dasgupta Anindya, Amrasa Kefe
{"title":"Geobody Interpretation and Its Application for Field Development","authors":"A. Olaniyi, Mora-Glukstad I. Miguel, Dasgupta Anindya, Amrasa Kefe","doi":"10.2118/198818-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Geobody identification via Spectral Decomposition has been used to optimize the development of a reservoir for a green field (Nime – not a real name) in the shallow offshore Niger Delta.\n The target reservoir (NM1 – not real name) is covered by a 3D seismic data that was acquired and processed using Post Stack Time Migration technique in the late nineties. Six exploration and appraisal wells have been drilled through the reservoir to date. Stratigraphically, the reservoir is approximately a 250- feet thick high net-to-gross (0.98 – 1), high porosity (0.26 – 0.28) sandstone interpreted to be stacked channel and shoreface sediments that were deposited in marginal marine environment.\n Given the high net-to-gross and porosity of the reservoir and absence of any intra-reservoir fault that may compartmentalize the reservoir, the reservoir is deemed laterally continuous and connected. However, fluid contact values derived from reliable combination of gamma ray, resistivity, neutron and density logs from the wells indicate a difference of 25 feet for the oil water contact (OWC) in the reservoir. To fully understand the contrasting information viz 25ft OWC difference in a highly sandy and ‘connected’ reservoir, spectral decomposition volume attribute was generated from the 3D seismic data and analyzed to determine the reservoir architecture.\n The spectral decomposition workflow applied involved two basic steps: i) Spectral analyser – to determine dominant frequencies in the 3D seismic volume; and ii) Spectral decomposition – creating 3D volumes for the dominant frequencies and analyzing them with the aim of identifying geobodies (channels) and defining the reservoir architecture.\n Prior to carrying out the Spectral Analyser, the 3D seismic cube should be ‘cropped’ to the required area of interest (AOI) to reduce computer memory required to run the algorithm. It is also advised to run any post-processing seismic workflow (e.g. VanGogh) that will increase signal to noise ratio before spectral decomposition.\n This paper presents the details of the Spectral Decomposition workflow which can be applied for identification of geobodies and how its result was used to optimally plan development wells in the target reservoir to mitigate an unlikely compartmentalization of the reservoir.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198818-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Geobody identification via Spectral Decomposition has been used to optimize the development of a reservoir for a green field (Nime – not a real name) in the shallow offshore Niger Delta. The target reservoir (NM1 – not real name) is covered by a 3D seismic data that was acquired and processed using Post Stack Time Migration technique in the late nineties. Six exploration and appraisal wells have been drilled through the reservoir to date. Stratigraphically, the reservoir is approximately a 250- feet thick high net-to-gross (0.98 – 1), high porosity (0.26 – 0.28) sandstone interpreted to be stacked channel and shoreface sediments that were deposited in marginal marine environment. Given the high net-to-gross and porosity of the reservoir and absence of any intra-reservoir fault that may compartmentalize the reservoir, the reservoir is deemed laterally continuous and connected. However, fluid contact values derived from reliable combination of gamma ray, resistivity, neutron and density logs from the wells indicate a difference of 25 feet for the oil water contact (OWC) in the reservoir. To fully understand the contrasting information viz 25ft OWC difference in a highly sandy and ‘connected’ reservoir, spectral decomposition volume attribute was generated from the 3D seismic data and analyzed to determine the reservoir architecture. The spectral decomposition workflow applied involved two basic steps: i) Spectral analyser – to determine dominant frequencies in the 3D seismic volume; and ii) Spectral decomposition – creating 3D volumes for the dominant frequencies and analyzing them with the aim of identifying geobodies (channels) and defining the reservoir architecture. Prior to carrying out the Spectral Analyser, the 3D seismic cube should be ‘cropped’ to the required area of interest (AOI) to reduce computer memory required to run the algorithm. It is also advised to run any post-processing seismic workflow (e.g. VanGogh) that will increase signal to noise ratio before spectral decomposition. This paper presents the details of the Spectral Decomposition workflow which can be applied for identification of geobodies and how its result was used to optimally plan development wells in the target reservoir to mitigate an unlikely compartmentalization of the reservoir.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地质体解释及其在油田开发中的应用
通过光谱分解进行地质体识别已被用于优化尼日尔三角洲浅海绿地(Nime -非真名)的油藏开发。目标储层(NM1 -非真实名称)被三维地震数据覆盖,该数据是在90年代末使用叠后时间偏移技术获取和处理的。迄今为止,该储层已钻了6口勘探评价井。地层学上,储层厚度约为250英尺,高净重比(0.98 - 1),高孔隙度(0.26 - 0.28)的砂岩被解释为沉积在边缘海洋环境中的水道和海岸沉积物的堆叠。考虑到储层的高净总比和孔隙度,并且没有任何可能分隔储层的储层内部断层,该储层被认为是横向连续且连通的。然而,根据井中伽马射线、电阻率、中子和密度测井的可靠组合得出的流体接触值表明,储层中的油水接触面(OWC)相差25英尺。为了充分了解高砂性和“连通”油藏的对比信息,即25英尺的OWC差异,从三维地震数据中生成光谱分解体积属性,并进行分析,以确定油藏结构。应用的频谱分解工作流程包括两个基本步骤:1)频谱分析——确定三维地震体中的主导频率;ii)频谱分解—为主要频率创建三维体积,并对其进行分析,目的是识别地质体(通道)并定义储层结构。在进行频谱分析仪之前,应该将三维地震立方体“裁剪”到所需的感兴趣区域(AOI),以减少运行算法所需的计算机内存。也建议在频谱分解之前运行任何后处理地震工作流(例如凡高),这将增加信噪比。本文介绍了光谱分解工作流程的细节,该工作流程可用于识别地质体,以及如何将其结果用于优化目标储层的开发井,以减轻不太可能出现的储层分隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Well Production Tubing Diameter on Multiphase Flow Regime Profile in Oredo Fields, Niger Delta, Nigeria Cassandra: A Model and Simulator Developed for Critical Drawdown Estimation in Unconsolidated Reservoirs The Use of 4D & Dynamic Synthesis in Brown Field Development: A Case Study of S-P3 Infill Well Maturation, Preparation and Drilling On the Characterisation of the Flow Regimes of Drilling Fluids Performance Evaluation of Cashew Nut Shell Liquid CNSL as Flow Improver for Waxy Crude Oils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1