“The end justifies the memes”: A feminist relational discourse analysis of the role of macro memes in facilitating supportive discussions for victim-survivors of narcissistic abuse

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.5817/cp2022-4-10
V. Howard, Amina Adan
{"title":"“The end justifies the memes”: A feminist relational discourse analysis of the role of macro memes in facilitating supportive discussions for victim-survivors of narcissistic abuse","authors":"V. Howard, Amina Adan","doi":"10.5817/cp2022-4-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports the results of a qualitative study which aimed to investigate the role of internet memes in facilitating supportive discussions among women on an online platform concerning narcissistic abuse. Narcissistic abuse is an under-recognised form of abuse underpinning experiences of domestic abuse and intimate partner violence. The study focuses upon women’s communication through the use of Facebook memes. Studying these and their associated content/posts is important for examining narcissistic abuse experiences because memes have been identified as immediate conveyors of meaning, and associated posts and comments provide rich data that can generate new findings pertinent to abuse and support experiences. A total of 4 public Facebook pages concerning narcissistic abuse were used to analyse 100 memes and their attached comments/posts, which ranged from 15 to 175 per meme with an arithmetic mean of 39.4. Employing a feminist relational discourse analysis (FRDA) framework, the data were categorised in terms of thematic frames and dominant discourses of victim-survivors. The analysis identified how community-specific Facebook pages assisted help-seeking discussions and expressions of distress. It also suggested that memes function as speech acts to discursively shape online conversations related to experiences of narcissistic abuse. As immediate conveyors of meaning, memes facilitated emotional expression to provide psychosocial support and a form of feminist activism to those who experienced feelings of isolation and marginalisation within broader political, psychological, and social contexts.","PeriodicalId":46651,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-4-10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reports the results of a qualitative study which aimed to investigate the role of internet memes in facilitating supportive discussions among women on an online platform concerning narcissistic abuse. Narcissistic abuse is an under-recognised form of abuse underpinning experiences of domestic abuse and intimate partner violence. The study focuses upon women’s communication through the use of Facebook memes. Studying these and their associated content/posts is important for examining narcissistic abuse experiences because memes have been identified as immediate conveyors of meaning, and associated posts and comments provide rich data that can generate new findings pertinent to abuse and support experiences. A total of 4 public Facebook pages concerning narcissistic abuse were used to analyse 100 memes and their attached comments/posts, which ranged from 15 to 175 per meme with an arithmetic mean of 39.4. Employing a feminist relational discourse analysis (FRDA) framework, the data were categorised in terms of thematic frames and dominant discourses of victim-survivors. The analysis identified how community-specific Facebook pages assisted help-seeking discussions and expressions of distress. It also suggested that memes function as speech acts to discursively shape online conversations related to experiences of narcissistic abuse. As immediate conveyors of meaning, memes facilitated emotional expression to provide psychosocial support and a form of feminist activism to those who experienced feelings of isolation and marginalisation within broader political, psychological, and social contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“目的证明了模因”:宏观模因在促进自恋虐待受害者-幸存者的支持性讨论中的作用的女权主义关系话语分析
本文报告了一项定性研究的结果,该研究旨在调查网络模因在促进女性在网络平台上关于自恋虐待的支持性讨论中的作用。自恋虐待是一种被忽视的虐待形式,是家庭虐待和亲密伴侣暴力的基础。这项研究的重点是女性通过使用Facebook表情包进行交流。研究这些及其相关的内容/帖子对于研究自恋虐待经历非常重要,因为模因被认为是意义的直接传达者,相关的帖子和评论提供了丰富的数据,可以产生与虐待和支持经历相关的新发现。共有4个关于自恋虐待的Facebook公开页面被用来分析100个表情包及其附带的评论/帖子,每个表情包的算术平均值为39.4,从15到175不等。采用女性主义关系话语分析(FRDA)框架,根据主题框架和受害者-幸存者的主导话语对数据进行分类。该分析确定了特定社区的Facebook页面如何帮助寻求帮助的讨论和表达痛苦。该研究还表明,模因作为一种言语行为,可以话语性地塑造与自恋虐待经历相关的在线对话。作为意义的直接传达者,模因促进了情感表达,为那些在更广泛的政治、心理和社会背景下感到孤立和边缘化的人提供了心理社会支持和女权主义行动的一种形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between preference for online social interaction and affective well-being via compulsive dating app use: The moderating role of algorithmic beliefs The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study Online pornography use and sexual satisfaction in association with relationship satisfaction among middle-aged and older people Facebook, social comparison and happiness: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1