Preservice Teachers’ Criticality in Analysing School English Teaching Materials: Gender Representation and Islamic Perspective

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.26858/ijole.v1i1.38573
Iwan Jazadi, I. Widari, Aris Dwi Intan Aprianti
{"title":"Preservice Teachers’ Criticality in Analysing School English Teaching Materials: Gender Representation and Islamic Perspective","authors":"Iwan Jazadi, I. Widari, Aris Dwi Intan Aprianti","doi":"10.26858/ijole.v1i1.38573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on teacher trainees’ ability in doing a critical analysis of an extract of English teaching materials from a gender perspective. The critical ability was prompted using a textbook extract that generated two gender issues, namely woman-man relationship and the position of women in occupational discourse. The participants were 38 trainees enrolled in textbook analysis subject in the English Department of a college in regional Indonesia. The research data were the trainees’ results of the mid-term test, designed with explicit instruction to ascertain the afore-mentioned critical elements, and their results of the final exam with implied instruction to discern the same critical elements. The data were analysed qualitatively by interpreting the participants’ responses based on their degree of criticality. The mid-term test results show that more than half of them were critical about woman-man relationship, while only 18% were critical about women position at work. The trainees’ results in the final test demonstrate a significant downturn of their critical thinking performances. Only 15% criticized woman-man relationship and 13% problematized women position at work. These findings raise concerns about the trainees’ level of criticality and so systematic efforts to sharpen trainees’ critical analytical ability should be further attempted.","PeriodicalId":40801,"journal":{"name":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.38573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reports on teacher trainees’ ability in doing a critical analysis of an extract of English teaching materials from a gender perspective. The critical ability was prompted using a textbook extract that generated two gender issues, namely woman-man relationship and the position of women in occupational discourse. The participants were 38 trainees enrolled in textbook analysis subject in the English Department of a college in regional Indonesia. The research data were the trainees’ results of the mid-term test, designed with explicit instruction to ascertain the afore-mentioned critical elements, and their results of the final exam with implied instruction to discern the same critical elements. The data were analysed qualitatively by interpreting the participants’ responses based on their degree of criticality. The mid-term test results show that more than half of them were critical about woman-man relationship, while only 18% were critical about women position at work. The trainees’ results in the final test demonstrate a significant downturn of their critical thinking performances. Only 15% criticized woman-man relationship and 13% problematized women position at work. These findings raise concerns about the trainees’ level of criticality and so systematic efforts to sharpen trainees’ critical analytical ability should be further attempted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前教师在学校英语教材分析中的关键性:性别代表性与伊斯兰教视角
本文从性别视角探讨了教师培训生对英语教材节选进行批判性分析的能力。这种批判能力是用一本教科书摘录来提示的,它产生了两个性别问题,即男女关系和妇女在职业话语中的地位。研究对象为印尼地区某高校英语系教材分析专业38名学员。研究数据是学员的期中考试结果,通过明确的指导来确定上述关键因素,以及他们的期末考试结果,通过暗示的指导来识别相同的关键因素。通过根据参与者的临界程度解释他们的反应,对数据进行定性分析。中期测试结果显示,超过一半的人对男女关系持批评态度,而只有18%的人对女性的工作地位持批评态度。在最终测试中,学员的批判性思维表现明显下降。只有15%的人批评男女关系,13%的人质疑女性在工作中的地位。这些发现引起了对受训者批判性水平的关注,因此应该进一步尝试系统地努力提高受训者的批判性分析能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Writing Knowledge and Writing Performance of Undergraduate Students The Impact of English Educational Tourism on the Growth of Local Economy: A Systematic Literature Review Enhancing Students’ Learning Outcomes through MALL in English Intensive Program for Railway Mechanical Technology Designing Research-Based Teacher-Appraisal Forms: A Case Of Effective EAP Lecturers in Swaziland Assessing the Nexus of EFL Learners’ Academic Self-concept and Their Formal English Vocabulary Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1