Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization, and Gender

Ann Bartow
{"title":"Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization, and Gender","authors":"Ann Bartow","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.374101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article starts by providing an overview of the types of personal data that is collected via the Internet, and the ways in which this information is used. The author asserts that because women are more likely to shop and share information in cyberspace, the impact of commodification of personal data disproportionately impacts females, enabling them to be \"targeted\" by marketing campaigns, and stripping them of personal privacy. The author then surveys the legal terrain of personal information privacy, and concludes that it is unlikely that the government will step in to provide consumers with substantive privacy rights or protections. Finally, the author asserts that perhaps intellectual property rights, so powerful in other contexts, can be adapted to provide individuals with ownership and control over their personal information. While \"high barrier\" intellectual property protections are in many respects detrimental to society, the author argues that if corporations are entitled to benefit from then and \"own\" information, then individuals should be as well. Ownership of information by individuals allows them to fashion something resembling privacy in personal data.","PeriodicalId":83425,"journal":{"name":"University of San Francisco law review. University of San Francisco. School of Law","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of San Francisco law review. University of San Francisco. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.374101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This Article starts by providing an overview of the types of personal data that is collected via the Internet, and the ways in which this information is used. The author asserts that because women are more likely to shop and share information in cyberspace, the impact of commodification of personal data disproportionately impacts females, enabling them to be "targeted" by marketing campaigns, and stripping them of personal privacy. The author then surveys the legal terrain of personal information privacy, and concludes that it is unlikely that the government will step in to provide consumers with substantive privacy rights or protections. Finally, the author asserts that perhaps intellectual property rights, so powerful in other contexts, can be adapted to provide individuals with ownership and control over their personal information. While "high barrier" intellectual property protections are in many respects detrimental to society, the author argues that if corporations are entitled to benefit from then and "own" information, then individuals should be as well. Ownership of information by individuals allows them to fashion something resembling privacy in personal data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的数据,我们自己:隐私,财产化和性别
本文首先概述了通过Internet收集的个人数据类型,以及使用这些信息的方式。作者断言,由于女性更有可能在网络空间购物和分享信息,个人数据商品化对女性的影响不成比例,使她们成为营销活动的“目标”,并剥夺了她们的个人隐私。作者随后调查了个人信息隐私的法律领域,并得出结论,政府不太可能介入,为消费者提供实质性的隐私权或保护。最后,作者断言,也许知识产权在其他情况下如此强大,可以适应为个人提供对其个人信息的所有权和控制权。虽然“高壁垒”的知识产权保护在许多方面对社会有害,但作者认为,如果公司有权从中受益并“拥有”信息,那么个人也应该如此。个人对信息的所有权使他们能够在个人数据中塑造类似隐私的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why and How the Supreme Court Should End the Death Penalty Policing the Cease-and-Desist Letter A Cognitive Science Approach to Takings Families, Law and Literature: The Story of a Course on Storytelling Ex Parte McCardle and the Attorney General's Duty to Defend Acts of Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1