{"title":"OTH-2 The symptom burden of irritable bowel syndrome in tertiary care during the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Hithin Noble, S. Hasan, P. Whorwell, D. Vasant","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionRecent data on the natural history of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) highlight the prognostic importance of extra-intestinal and psychological symptom profiles. Those with a high psychological burden have been shown to have the worst prognosis, and are consequently most likely to be referred to tertiary care. The Covid-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to tertiary services and affected the mental health of the nation, however there is minimal data on the effects on patients with IBS in tertiary care. We therefore compared the symptom profiles of tertiary referrals with refractory IBS, 12-months before, and 12-months after the onset of Covid-19 restrictions in the UK.MethodsAs part of their routine care, all patients with refractory IBS referred to the tertiary service before and after the Covid-19 pandemic prospectively completed a series of questionnaires during their baseline consultation including;IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS), non-colonic symptom score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD), and Quality of Life (QoL). Demographic data and symptom profiles were compared between patients seen in the 12 months before the pandemic (22/03/2019 - 22/03/2020) with those seen in the 12-months after (23/03/2020 - 23/03/2021), using non-parametric tests.ResultsOverall, 190 patients (median age 43 years, n=157 (82.6%) female, 41.0% IBS-C, 24.7% IBS-D, IBS-M 33.7% and 0.5% IBS-U) with refractory IBS were included. Compared to those seen in the 12-months before the pandemic (n=107), the cohort seen during the Covid-19 pandemic (n=83) had a significantly higher median IBS-SSS (318 vs. 352, p=0.03), and more extra-intestinal symptoms (non-colonic score: 225 vs. 269, p=0.03). During the pandemic, median abdominal pain (50 vs. 63, p=0.05) and abdominal distension scores (60 vs. 75, p=0.008) were significantly higher, and patients that were unmarried had a higher median IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS: 320 vs. 359, p=0.03). Interestingly, those seen during the pandemic had more difficulty with sleep (53 vs. 68, p=0.03), and more feelings of helplessness and loss of control (50 vs. 70, p=0.02), compared to those seen before the pandemic. There was no difference in the levels of anxiety and depression between the pre and post lockdown groups (HAD-Anxiety: 11 vs. 11.5, p=0.96;HAD-Depression: 8 vs. 8, p=0.84).ConclusionsThis study has shown for the first time that patients seen in tertiary care with refractory IBS during the covid-19 pandemic had a significantly higher symptom burden emphasising the importance of gut-brain axis in IBS. Furthermore, lack of support and perceived loss of control appear to be contributory factors.","PeriodicalId":19616,"journal":{"name":"Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionRecent data on the natural history of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) highlight the prognostic importance of extra-intestinal and psychological symptom profiles. Those with a high psychological burden have been shown to have the worst prognosis, and are consequently most likely to be referred to tertiary care. The Covid-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to tertiary services and affected the mental health of the nation, however there is minimal data on the effects on patients with IBS in tertiary care. We therefore compared the symptom profiles of tertiary referrals with refractory IBS, 12-months before, and 12-months after the onset of Covid-19 restrictions in the UK.MethodsAs part of their routine care, all patients with refractory IBS referred to the tertiary service before and after the Covid-19 pandemic prospectively completed a series of questionnaires during their baseline consultation including;IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS), non-colonic symptom score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD), and Quality of Life (QoL). Demographic data and symptom profiles were compared between patients seen in the 12 months before the pandemic (22/03/2019 - 22/03/2020) with those seen in the 12-months after (23/03/2020 - 23/03/2021), using non-parametric tests.ResultsOverall, 190 patients (median age 43 years, n=157 (82.6%) female, 41.0% IBS-C, 24.7% IBS-D, IBS-M 33.7% and 0.5% IBS-U) with refractory IBS were included. Compared to those seen in the 12-months before the pandemic (n=107), the cohort seen during the Covid-19 pandemic (n=83) had a significantly higher median IBS-SSS (318 vs. 352, p=0.03), and more extra-intestinal symptoms (non-colonic score: 225 vs. 269, p=0.03). During the pandemic, median abdominal pain (50 vs. 63, p=0.05) and abdominal distension scores (60 vs. 75, p=0.008) were significantly higher, and patients that were unmarried had a higher median IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS: 320 vs. 359, p=0.03). Interestingly, those seen during the pandemic had more difficulty with sleep (53 vs. 68, p=0.03), and more feelings of helplessness and loss of control (50 vs. 70, p=0.02), compared to those seen before the pandemic. There was no difference in the levels of anxiety and depression between the pre and post lockdown groups (HAD-Anxiety: 11 vs. 11.5, p=0.96;HAD-Depression: 8 vs. 8, p=0.84).ConclusionsThis study has shown for the first time that patients seen in tertiary care with refractory IBS during the covid-19 pandemic had a significantly higher symptom burden emphasising the importance of gut-brain axis in IBS. Furthermore, lack of support and perceived loss of control appear to be contributory factors.
肠易激综合征(IBS)自然病史的最新数据强调了肠外和心理症状特征对预后的重要性。那些有高心理负担的人预后最差,因此最有可能转诊到三级保健。Covid-19大流行对三级医疗服务造成了严重干扰,并影响了全国的心理健康,但关于三级医疗服务对肠易激综合征患者影响的数据很少。因此,我们比较了英国Covid-19限制发作前12个月和12个月后难治性肠易激综合征三级转诊患者的症状概况。方法作为常规护理的一部分,所有在Covid-19大流行前后就诊的难治性IBS患者在基线咨询期间前瞻性地完成了一系列问卷调查,包括IBS症状严重程度评分(IBS- sss)、非结肠症状评分、医院焦虑和抑郁(HAD)和生活质量(QoL)。使用非参数测试,比较了大流行前12个月(2019年3月22日至2020年3月22日)与大流行后12个月(2020年3月23日至2021年3月23日)患者的人口统计数据和症状概况。结果共纳入难治性IBS患者190例(中位年龄43岁,女性157例(82.6%),其中IBS- c 41.0%, IBS- d 24.7%, IBS- m 33.7%, IBS- u 0.5%)。与大流行前12个月(n=107)相比,在Covid-19大流行期间(n=83)观察到的队列具有显着更高的IBS-SSS中位数(318对352,p=0.03),以及更多的肠道外症状(非结肠评分:225对269,p=0.03)。大流行期间,腹痛中位数(50比63,p=0.05)和腹胀评分中位数(60比75,p=0.008)明显更高,未婚患者IBS症状严重程度中位数更高(IBS- sss: 320比359,p=0.03)。有趣的是,与大流行前相比,在大流行期间观察到的人有更多的睡眠困难(53比68,p=0.03),更多的无助感和失控感(50比70,p=0.02)。封锁前组和封锁后组的焦虑和抑郁水平没有差异(多动症-焦虑:11比11.5,p=0.96;多动症-抑郁:8比8,p=0.84)。该研究首次表明,在covid-19大流行期间在三级医疗机构就诊的难治性肠易激综合征患者的症状负担显著增加,强调了肠-脑轴在肠易激综合征中的重要性。此外,缺乏支持和感觉失去控制似乎是促成因素。