Digital compression of echocardiographic images: is it viable?

T. Karson, S. Chandra, A. Morehead, S. Nissen, J.D. Thomas
{"title":"Digital compression of echocardiographic images: is it viable?","authors":"T. Karson, S. Chandra, A. Morehead, S. Nissen, J.D. Thomas","doi":"10.1109/CIC.1993.378356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The degree of information loss by compression of echocardiographic images utilizing the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) baseline system was evaluated using objective fidelity criteria. Standard echocardiograms were acquired digitally in real-time and stored on optical disk. 180 still frame images were processed in software using 5 preset quantization tables yielding average compression ratios of 7:1, 10:1, 17:1, 30:1 and 36:1. Objective parameters evaluated include the root mean square error (RMSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), difference image mean and maximal pixel value shift. The mean pixel values and standard deviations of all images over all levels of compression were very similar. Even for ratios as high as 35:1, no significant bias was introduced in the pixel intensity values. Average RMSE ranged from 1.27 to 7.89 while average SNR ranged from 38.81 to 22.93. The data shows that JPEG compression at high ratios does not significantly alter objective image content and is a potential solution for reducing digital storage requirements.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":20445,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","volume":"8 1","pages":"831-834"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.1993.378356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The degree of information loss by compression of echocardiographic images utilizing the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) baseline system was evaluated using objective fidelity criteria. Standard echocardiograms were acquired digitally in real-time and stored on optical disk. 180 still frame images were processed in software using 5 preset quantization tables yielding average compression ratios of 7:1, 10:1, 17:1, 30:1 and 36:1. Objective parameters evaluated include the root mean square error (RMSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), difference image mean and maximal pixel value shift. The mean pixel values and standard deviations of all images over all levels of compression were very similar. Even for ratios as high as 35:1, no significant bias was introduced in the pixel intensity values. Average RMSE ranged from 1.27 to 7.89 while average SNR ranged from 38.81 to 22.93. The data shows that JPEG compression at high ratios does not significantly alter objective image content and is a potential solution for reducing digital storage requirements.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声心动图图像的数字压缩:可行吗?
利用联合摄影专家组(JPEG)基线系统,利用客观保真标准评估超声心动图图像压缩的信息损失程度。标准超声心动图以数字方式实时采集并存储在光盘上。采用5个预设量化表对180幅静止帧图像进行软件处理,平均压缩比分别为7:1、10:1、17:1、30:1和36:1。评估的客观参数包括均方根误差(RMSE)、信噪比(SNR)、差分图像均值和最大像素值移位。在所有压缩水平下,所有图像的平均像素值和标准差非常相似。即使对于高达35:1的比例,在像素强度值中也没有引入明显的偏差。平均RMSE为1.27 ~ 7.89,平均信噪比为38.81 ~ 22.93。数据表明,高比率的JPEG压缩不会显著改变客观图像内容,是降低数字存储要求的潜在解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 528 channel system for the acquisition and display of defibrillation and electrocardiographic potentials Computers: the heart of screening Signal averaging enhancement by jitter deconvolution Numerical simulation of the flow in model skeletal muscle ventricles Transmembrane potential changes during stimulation in a bidomain model of the myocardium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1