Firm Attributes and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and South Africa Banks

John Obiora Anyaduba, Ivie Ologhosa Ogbeide
{"title":"Firm Attributes and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and South Africa Banks","authors":"John Obiora Anyaduba, Ivie Ologhosa Ogbeide","doi":"10.5430/afr.v11n2p18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to investigate the link between firm attributes and tax aggressiveness in Nigeria and South Africa. A comparative analysis was carried out on the variables of firm size, age, profitability, leverage, liquidity, complexity, foreign ownership and tax aggressiveness on banks in Nigeria and South Africa. The study employed the longitudinal research design and took a comparative analysis approach. The population consists of the 13 listed commercial banks quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange and the 16 local commercial banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The time frame for the study was from 2012-2020. Data collated was analysed using the techniques of descriptive statistic, correlation and panel data regression technique while MAPE and Theil’s inequality coefficient were used in evaluating the forecast abilities of the models. Two alternative measures of tax aggressiveness (GAAP-ETR and D_BTD) were adopted as dependent variables. The panel data collected was analysed. The result of the Nigerian model (using the D_BTD measure) showed that firm size and firm complexity both have a significant positive relationship with tax aggressiveness while firm age and profitability asserted significant negative impacts on tax aggressiveness. The outcome of the South Africa model (using the GAAP-ETR measure) showed that firm age and profitability have a significant negative relationship with tax aggressiveness while firm size and liquidity have significant positive relationships with tax aggressiveness. The study recommends, that regulatory bodies and tax authorities should beam their searchlight on tax saving strategies of small size companies with a view to effectively monitoring their aggressive tax avoidance schemes.","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v11n2p18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the link between firm attributes and tax aggressiveness in Nigeria and South Africa. A comparative analysis was carried out on the variables of firm size, age, profitability, leverage, liquidity, complexity, foreign ownership and tax aggressiveness on banks in Nigeria and South Africa. The study employed the longitudinal research design and took a comparative analysis approach. The population consists of the 13 listed commercial banks quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange and the 16 local commercial banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The time frame for the study was from 2012-2020. Data collated was analysed using the techniques of descriptive statistic, correlation and panel data regression technique while MAPE and Theil’s inequality coefficient were used in evaluating the forecast abilities of the models. Two alternative measures of tax aggressiveness (GAAP-ETR and D_BTD) were adopted as dependent variables. The panel data collected was analysed. The result of the Nigerian model (using the D_BTD measure) showed that firm size and firm complexity both have a significant positive relationship with tax aggressiveness while firm age and profitability asserted significant negative impacts on tax aggressiveness. The outcome of the South Africa model (using the GAAP-ETR measure) showed that firm age and profitability have a significant negative relationship with tax aggressiveness while firm size and liquidity have significant positive relationships with tax aggressiveness. The study recommends, that regulatory bodies and tax authorities should beam their searchlight on tax saving strategies of small size companies with a view to effectively monitoring their aggressive tax avoidance schemes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业属性与企业税收攻击性:尼日利亚与南非银行比较研究
本文的目的是调查尼日利亚和南非的企业属性和税收侵略性之间的联系。对尼日利亚和南非银行的公司规模、年龄、盈利能力、杠杆率、流动性、复杂性、外资所有权和税收侵略性等变量进行了比较分析。本研究采用纵向研究设计,采用比较分析方法。人口包括13家在尼日利亚证券交易所上市的商业银行和16家在约翰内斯堡证券交易所上市的当地商业银行。这项研究的时间框架是从2012年到2020年。整理后的数据采用描述性统计、相关和面板数据回归技术进行分析,并采用MAPE和Theil不平等系数评价模型的预测能力。采用两种替代的税收侵略性措施(GAAP-ETR和D_BTD)作为因变量。对收集到的面板数据进行分析。尼日利亚模型(使用D_BTD度量)的结果表明,企业规模和企业复杂性都与税收侵略性有显著的正相关,而企业年龄和盈利能力对税收侵略性有显著的负相关影响。南非模型的结果(使用GAAP-ETR测量)表明,公司年龄和盈利能力与税收侵略性有显著的负相关,而公司规模和流动性与税收侵略性有显著的正相关。该研究建议,监管机构和税务机关应将探照灯对准小型企业的节税策略,以期有效监控其激进的避税计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of the level of Islamicity performance index on the financial performance of Islamic banks The literature review of Islamic performance measurement models at sharia banks in Indonesia Gender issues in local government accountability reports: insights from Islamic regions in Indonesia Godly accountability: reflection on ethics for zakat accountants Bank social fund distribution and cost of profit-sharing investment account: evidence from Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1