Outcome & Complications of Decompressive Craniectomy with Expansion Duroplasty in Severe Head Injury

Zubair Mustafa Khan, Zehra Safdar, Syed Ahmad Faizan, Asif Shabir, Muhammad Shakir, Asif Bashir
{"title":"Outcome & Complications of Decompressive Craniectomy with Expansion Duroplasty in Severe Head Injury","authors":"Zubair Mustafa Khan, Zehra Safdar, Syed Ahmad Faizan, Asif Shabir, Muhammad Shakir, Asif Bashir","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i2.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  A descriptive case series was conducted to find the frequency of complications and complications of decompressive craniectomy with expansion duraplasty in severe head injury. \nMaterial and Methods:  189 patients fulfilling the selection criteria were included. All patients had TBI which was confirmed by CT scan. Surgery was performed on the day of admission under general anesthesia and a large trauma flap. Patients were monitored daily by evaluators from the date of surgery until hospital discharge or death. Patients were followed up for 3 months and the outcome was assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). \nResults:  Mean age of the patients was 36.57 years. There were 61.4% (116) males and 38.6% (73) females. 3.7% had CSF leakage. 1.6% had meningitis. Wound infection was seen in 7.4% of patients. Forty percent had a favorable outcome and 60% had a poor outcome. Fifty patients out of 111 patients between 18 – 40 years showed good outcomes. Twenty-six out of 78 from the 41 – 60 years age group showed good outcomes. Out of 189 total, 76 patients had a good outcome. The outcome was good in 63 patients out of 148 patients with GCS 5 – 8, whereas 13 (out of 41) patients had a good outcome with GCS below 5. \nConclusion:  We discovered that the result was good in 40% of patients, with 11 percent of complications recorded. Therefore, we concluded that decompressive craniectomy with expansion duraplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of the severe head injury.","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i2.684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective:  A descriptive case series was conducted to find the frequency of complications and complications of decompressive craniectomy with expansion duraplasty in severe head injury. Material and Methods:  189 patients fulfilling the selection criteria were included. All patients had TBI which was confirmed by CT scan. Surgery was performed on the day of admission under general anesthesia and a large trauma flap. Patients were monitored daily by evaluators from the date of surgery until hospital discharge or death. Patients were followed up for 3 months and the outcome was assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). Results:  Mean age of the patients was 36.57 years. There were 61.4% (116) males and 38.6% (73) females. 3.7% had CSF leakage. 1.6% had meningitis. Wound infection was seen in 7.4% of patients. Forty percent had a favorable outcome and 60% had a poor outcome. Fifty patients out of 111 patients between 18 – 40 years showed good outcomes. Twenty-six out of 78 from the 41 – 60 years age group showed good outcomes. Out of 189 total, 76 patients had a good outcome. The outcome was good in 63 patients out of 148 patients with GCS 5 – 8, whereas 13 (out of 41) patients had a good outcome with GCS below 5. Conclusion:  We discovered that the result was good in 40% of patients, with 11 percent of complications recorded. Therefore, we concluded that decompressive craniectomy with expansion duraplasty is an effective procedure for the treatment of the severe head injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重型颅脑损伤减压术加硬脑膜扩张成形术的疗效及并发症分析
目的:通过描述性病例分析,了解重型颅脑损伤行颅骨减压术合并硬膜扩张成形术的并发症发生率及并发症。材料与方法:189例患者符合入选标准。所有患者均为颅脑损伤,经CT扫描证实。手术于入院当天在全身麻醉和大创伤皮瓣下进行。从手术之日起,评估人员每天对患者进行监测,直到出院或死亡。随访3个月,采用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估预后。结果:患者平均年龄36.57岁。男性116例(61.4%),女性73例(38.6%)。3.7%发生脑脊液漏。1.6%患有脑膜炎。7.4%的患者出现伤口感染。40%的人结果良好,60%的人结果不佳。111例18 - 40岁的患者中有50例预后良好。在41 - 60岁年龄组的78人中,有26人表现出良好的结果。189例患者中,76例预后良好。148例GCS为5 - 8的患者中有63例预后良好,而GCS低于5的患者中有13例(41例)预后良好。结论:我们发现40%的患者结果良好,11%的并发症记录。因此,我们认为颅骨减压术联合硬脑膜扩张成形术是治疗重型颅脑损伤的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational biomarkers for the decision of neurosurgical treatment for brain tumors Outcomes of Management of Pituitary Adenoma by Use of Octreotide Injections Preoperatively Metallic Foreign Body in the Neck – a Rare Incidence Comparison of the Efficacy of Fusion with Non-Fusion Treatment for Recurrent Lumber Disc Herniation (RLDH) Impact of Intracranial Pressure-Monitored Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1