Standards and normalization of displays

H Stegehuis
{"title":"Standards and normalization of displays","authors":"H Stegehuis","doi":"10.1016/S0222-0776(00)88261-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Explanation of the Dicom grayscale display standard, which should guarantee a reproducible and subjectively similar impression of displayed images at all viewing sites. Aspects of ambient light and calibration and current efforts for further standardization of general image processing operations like subtraction and windowing will be shortly mentioned. The standard covers display on film as well as on monitors, which generally have different luminance ranges. Results will be presented from a limited comparison of the Dicom standard with a proprietary standard on subjective similarity between film and monitor images.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Medical images from different modalities (X-ray, CT, MR) were presented on film and on a monitor screen according to both grayscale standards. Image specialists were asked to grade the similarity between both representations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the subjective similarity obtained with both standards.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Dicom standards provide a framework for easy and reproducible exchange of images. Our limited study suggests that the grayscale standard gives acceptable similarity of images on monitor and film. However more extended clinical comparisons are recommended, e.g. on finetuning and calibration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101059,"journal":{"name":"RBM-News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0222-0776(00)88261-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RBM-News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0222077600882619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Explanation of the Dicom grayscale display standard, which should guarantee a reproducible and subjectively similar impression of displayed images at all viewing sites. Aspects of ambient light and calibration and current efforts for further standardization of general image processing operations like subtraction and windowing will be shortly mentioned. The standard covers display on film as well as on monitors, which generally have different luminance ranges. Results will be presented from a limited comparison of the Dicom standard with a proprietary standard on subjective similarity between film and monitor images.

Materials and methods

Medical images from different modalities (X-ray, CT, MR) were presented on film and on a monitor screen according to both grayscale standards. Image specialists were asked to grade the similarity between both representations.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the subjective similarity obtained with both standards.

Conclusion

The Dicom standards provide a framework for easy and reproducible exchange of images. Our limited study suggests that the grayscale standard gives acceptable similarity of images on monitor and film. However more extended clinical comparisons are recommended, e.g. on finetuning and calibration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显示器的标准和规范化
目的解释Dicom灰度显示标准,该标准应保证在所有观看地点显示图像的再现性和主观上相似的印象。环境光和校准方面以及目前为进一步标准化一般图像处理操作(如减法和开窗)所做的努力将很快被提及。该标准涵盖胶片和显示器上的显示,它们通常具有不同的亮度范围。本文将对Dicom标准和专有标准在胶片和监视器图像之间的主观相似性进行有限的比较。材料和方法不同模式(x射线、CT、MR)的医学图像按两种灰度标准分别在胶片和监视器屏幕上显示。图像专家被要求给两种图像之间的相似性打分。结果两种标准主观相似度比较,差异无统计学意义。结论Dicom标准为图像交换提供了一个简单、可重复的框架。我们有限的研究表明,灰度标准使显示器和胶片上的图像具有可接受的相似性。然而,建议进行更广泛的临床比较,例如微调和校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Errata Évaluation de l'équilibre neurovégétatif chez le nourrisson Bug de l'an 2000, et après ?: Quels enseignements pour la matériovigilance ? Accréditation EN 45001 au service biomédical Systèmes de documentation informatisée de l'anesthésie (et de la réanimation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1