Gesticulate for Health's Sake! Understanding the Use of Gestures as an Input Modality for Microtask Crowdsourcing

Garrett Allen, Andrea Hu, U. Gadiraju
{"title":"Gesticulate for Health's Sake! Understanding the Use of Gestures as an Input Modality for Microtask Crowdsourcing","authors":"Garrett Allen, Andrea Hu, U. Gadiraju","doi":"10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human input is pivotal in building reliable and robust artificial intelligence systems. By providing a means to gather diverse, high-quality, representative, and cost-effective human input on demand, microtask crowdsourcing marketplaces have thrived. Despite the unmistakable benefits available from online crowd work, the lack of health provisions and safeguards, along with existing work practices threatens the sustainability of this paradigm. Prior work has investigated worker engagement and mental health, yet no such investigations into the effects of crowd work on the physical health of workers have been undertaken. Crowd workers complete their work in various sub-optimal work environments, often using a conventional input modality of a mouse and keyboard. The repetitive nature of microtask crowdsourcing can lead to stress-related injuries, such as the well-documented carpal tunnel syndrome. It is known that stretching exercises can help reduce injuries and discomfort in office workers. Gestures, the act of using the body intentionally to affect the behavior of an intelligent system, can serve as both stretches and an alternative form of input for microtasks. To better understand the usefulness of the dual-purpose input modality of ergonomically-informed gestures across different crowdsourced microtasks, we carried out a controlled 2 x 3 between-subjects study (N=294). Considering the potential benefits of gestures as an input modality, our results suggest a real trade-off between worker accuracy in exchange for potential short to long-term health benefits.","PeriodicalId":87339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Human input is pivotal in building reliable and robust artificial intelligence systems. By providing a means to gather diverse, high-quality, representative, and cost-effective human input on demand, microtask crowdsourcing marketplaces have thrived. Despite the unmistakable benefits available from online crowd work, the lack of health provisions and safeguards, along with existing work practices threatens the sustainability of this paradigm. Prior work has investigated worker engagement and mental health, yet no such investigations into the effects of crowd work on the physical health of workers have been undertaken. Crowd workers complete their work in various sub-optimal work environments, often using a conventional input modality of a mouse and keyboard. The repetitive nature of microtask crowdsourcing can lead to stress-related injuries, such as the well-documented carpal tunnel syndrome. It is known that stretching exercises can help reduce injuries and discomfort in office workers. Gestures, the act of using the body intentionally to affect the behavior of an intelligent system, can serve as both stretches and an alternative form of input for microtasks. To better understand the usefulness of the dual-purpose input modality of ergonomically-informed gestures across different crowdsourced microtasks, we carried out a controlled 2 x 3 between-subjects study (N=294). Considering the potential benefits of gestures as an input modality, our results suggest a real trade-off between worker accuracy in exchange for potential short to long-term health benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为了健康多做手势!理解手势作为微任务众包输入方式的使用
人的输入是建立可靠和强大的人工智能系统的关键。通过提供一种方法来收集多样化、高质量、具有代表性和成本效益的人力投入,微任务众包市场蓬勃发展。尽管在线人群工作带来了明显的好处,但缺乏卫生规定和保障,加上现有的工作做法,威胁着这种模式的可持续性。先前的工作调查了工人的敬业度和心理健康,但没有对群体工作对工人身体健康的影响进行过此类调查。群体工作者在各种次优的工作环境中完成工作,通常使用鼠标和键盘的传统输入方式。微任务众包的重复性会导致与压力相关的伤害,比如有充分证据的腕管综合征。众所周知,伸展运动可以帮助办公室职员减少受伤和不适。手势是一种有意使用身体来影响智能系统行为的行为,可以作为微任务的延伸和另一种输入形式。为了更好地理解人机工程学手势在不同众包微任务中的双重输入方式的有用性,我们进行了一项对照2 x 3的受试者间研究(N=294)。考虑到手势作为一种输入方式的潜在好处,我们的研究结果表明,工人的准确性与潜在的短期和长期健康益处之间存在真正的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection Crowdsourced Clustering via Active Querying: Practical Algorithm with Theoretical Guarantees BackTrace: A Human-AI Collaborative Approach to Discovering Studio Backdrops in Historical Photographs Confidence Contours: Uncertainty-Aware Annotation for Medical Semantic Segmentation Humans Forgo Reward to Instill Fairness into AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1