Salaries in Forensic Anthropology and Academic Anthropology

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI:10.5744/fa.2020.1123
Nicholas V. Passalacqua, Elaine Y. Chu, M. Pilloud
{"title":"Salaries in Forensic Anthropology and Academic Anthropology","authors":"Nicholas V. Passalacqua, Elaine Y. Chu, M. Pilloud","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.1123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project examined the salaries of forensic anthropologists in the United States. Additionally, the salaries of forensic anthropologists employed in academia were compared to those of other academic anthropologists. The goal of this project was to develop baseline data in terms of salaries for forensic anthropologists while also examining various factors that may affect forensic anthropology salaries. Salary information is important because salary transparency narrows wage disparities, reduces favoritism and discrimination, increases the bargaining power of employees, and potentially causes employers to focus more on salary differentiation in terms of productivity and seniority; essentially, wage transparency generates greater equity among employees (Estlund 2014). \nIn order to examine salaries in forensic anthropology, internet search engines were used to find open-access salary data for individuals currently listed as non-student members of the anthropology section of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and/or the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. All variables were analyzed using random forest models. \nResults found that in all models, there were no differences in salary between men and women. Further, no significant differences were found between anthropology subfields in academia. Importantly, years since terminal degree was the most important variable affecting salary in all models, with academic rank being the most important variable for individuals employed in the academic sector. Further, these results demonstrate inconsistencies in pay for forensic anthropologists, especially for those working in the applied sector.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"1986 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This project examined the salaries of forensic anthropologists in the United States. Additionally, the salaries of forensic anthropologists employed in academia were compared to those of other academic anthropologists. The goal of this project was to develop baseline data in terms of salaries for forensic anthropologists while also examining various factors that may affect forensic anthropology salaries. Salary information is important because salary transparency narrows wage disparities, reduces favoritism and discrimination, increases the bargaining power of employees, and potentially causes employers to focus more on salary differentiation in terms of productivity and seniority; essentially, wage transparency generates greater equity among employees (Estlund 2014). In order to examine salaries in forensic anthropology, internet search engines were used to find open-access salary data for individuals currently listed as non-student members of the anthropology section of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and/or the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. All variables were analyzed using random forest models. Results found that in all models, there were no differences in salary between men and women. Further, no significant differences were found between anthropology subfields in academia. Importantly, years since terminal degree was the most important variable affecting salary in all models, with academic rank being the most important variable for individuals employed in the academic sector. Further, these results demonstrate inconsistencies in pay for forensic anthropologists, especially for those working in the applied sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医人类学和学术人类学的薪水
这个项目调查了美国法医人类学家的薪水。此外,还将受雇于学术界的法医人类学家的薪金与其他学术人类学家的薪金进行了比较。该项目的目标是为法医人类学家的工资制定基准数据,同时也检查可能影响法医人类学工资的各种因素。工资信息很重要,因为工资透明度缩小了工资差距,减少了偏袒和歧视,增加了雇员的议价能力,并可能使雇主更多地关注生产率和资历方面的工资差异;从本质上讲,工资透明度在员工之间产生了更大的公平(Estlund 2014)。为了研究法医人类学的薪水,我们使用互联网搜索引擎来查找目前被列为美国法医科学院和/或美国法医人类学委员会人类学部门非学生成员的个人的公开薪水数据。所有变量均采用随机森林模型进行分析。结果发现,在所有模型中,男女之间的工资没有差异。此外,学术界人类学子领域之间没有发现显著差异。重要的是,在所有模型中,毕业年限是影响薪酬的最重要变量,而学术排名是学术部门就业的个人最重要的变量。此外,这些结果表明法医人类学家,特别是在应用部门工作的法医人类学家的薪酬不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Plurality Rule, Majority Principle and Indeterminacy in German Elections Tax Competition and Leviathan with Decentralized Leadership Homeowner Subsidies and Suburban Living: Empirical Evidence from a Subsidy Repeal The Effect of an Employment Subsidy in Persistent Stagnation Improving Public Good Supply and Income Equality: Facing a Potential Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1