Abstract 542: Validation of low fraction allelic variants in plasma samples from patients with late stage colorectal cancer using droplet digital PCR: Potential clinical utility for minimal residual disease monitoring

Dennis O'Rourke, Danyi Wang, J. Scheuenpflug, Zheng Feng
{"title":"Abstract 542: Validation of low fraction allelic variants in plasma samples from patients with late stage colorectal cancer using droplet digital PCR: Potential clinical utility for minimal residual disease monitoring","authors":"Dennis O'Rourke, Danyi Wang, J. Scheuenpflug, Zheng Feng","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reliable detection of low mutant allele fractions (MAF) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers clinically crucial information. Importantly, minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in solid tumors has been recognized as a powerful readout for response and early relapse prediction. Considering the high sample input requirement and assay complexity of whole exome sequencing (WES) or targeted NGS technologies, it is essential to develop a cost-effective absolute quantification approach to measure MAF with low DNA input amount. Clinically relevant gene variants present both in plasma ctDNA and tissue of origin were identified in a previous study of 25 late-stage CRC samples analyzed using the Guardant Health GuardantOMNI NGS panel (ctDNA) and WES (tumor). We further investigated the potential of using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to measure variants present only in ctDNA; particularly for those at low MAF which could be applied for MRD monitoring. Methods: We developed ddPCR assays for 13 variants which were detected with the GuardantOMNI panel in ctDNA and not tissue from 5 of 25 advanced stage CRC samples. MAF for the previously reported variants ranged from 64.0% (FBXW7 p.R505C) to 1.2% (TP53 R273H). Among the newly investigated variants the range was 2.2% (EPHA7 I146T) to 0.4% (PDGFRA1 pL31F and RB1 p.E440K). Other variants included KRAS G12D (30.8%), PIK3CA p.C420R (29.2%), TP53 p.R273H (1.2%) and ERBB4 p.I736T (1.1%). Positive control cDNA was designed and spiked into a pool of healthy plasma to determine the baseline wildtype levels and the sensitivity of each assay. Patient ctDNA was then measured. Results: MAF from ddPCR data and the GuardantOMNI panel showed high concordance (r2 = 0.9986) for all data points (n=13). When only considering those variants with MAF less than 5% (n=9; TP53 R273H, TSC2, EP300, PPP2R1A, LIG4, EPHA7, ERBB4, PDGFRA1, and RB1) the concordance remained high with r2 = 0.9532, thus demonstrating the accuracy and sensitivity of both platforms. All ddPCR results were achieved with at most 5ng input DNA and as low as 1ng in most cases. However, the concordance begins to weaken below 1% MAF (r2=0.4024), likely due to the limit of detection of the current ddPCR assays. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ddPCR offers a highly sensitive and purely quantitative method to measure low MAF with minimal sample input requirements, which highlights the potential use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring. As one possible MRD monitoring approach, NGS panel-based assays may identify all variants at baseline screening, followed by ddPCR as a complementary solution for MRD monitoring of single variants. Currently, there are ongoing efforts in examining longitudinal ctDNA variant changes in CRC patients receiving treatment to further confirm which variants could be used for MRD monitoring in CRC. Citation Format: Dennis O9Rourke, Danyi Wang, Juergen Scheuenpflug, Zheng Feng. Validation of low fraction allelic variants in plasma samples from patients with late stage colorectal cancer using droplet digital PCR: Potential clinical utility for minimal residual disease monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 542.","PeriodicalId":10518,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Reliable detection of low mutant allele fractions (MAF) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers clinically crucial information. Importantly, minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in solid tumors has been recognized as a powerful readout for response and early relapse prediction. Considering the high sample input requirement and assay complexity of whole exome sequencing (WES) or targeted NGS technologies, it is essential to develop a cost-effective absolute quantification approach to measure MAF with low DNA input amount. Clinically relevant gene variants present both in plasma ctDNA and tissue of origin were identified in a previous study of 25 late-stage CRC samples analyzed using the Guardant Health GuardantOMNI NGS panel (ctDNA) and WES (tumor). We further investigated the potential of using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to measure variants present only in ctDNA; particularly for those at low MAF which could be applied for MRD monitoring. Methods: We developed ddPCR assays for 13 variants which were detected with the GuardantOMNI panel in ctDNA and not tissue from 5 of 25 advanced stage CRC samples. MAF for the previously reported variants ranged from 64.0% (FBXW7 p.R505C) to 1.2% (TP53 R273H). Among the newly investigated variants the range was 2.2% (EPHA7 I146T) to 0.4% (PDGFRA1 pL31F and RB1 p.E440K). Other variants included KRAS G12D (30.8%), PIK3CA p.C420R (29.2%), TP53 p.R273H (1.2%) and ERBB4 p.I736T (1.1%). Positive control cDNA was designed and spiked into a pool of healthy plasma to determine the baseline wildtype levels and the sensitivity of each assay. Patient ctDNA was then measured. Results: MAF from ddPCR data and the GuardantOMNI panel showed high concordance (r2 = 0.9986) for all data points (n=13). When only considering those variants with MAF less than 5% (n=9; TP53 R273H, TSC2, EP300, PPP2R1A, LIG4, EPHA7, ERBB4, PDGFRA1, and RB1) the concordance remained high with r2 = 0.9532, thus demonstrating the accuracy and sensitivity of both platforms. All ddPCR results were achieved with at most 5ng input DNA and as low as 1ng in most cases. However, the concordance begins to weaken below 1% MAF (r2=0.4024), likely due to the limit of detection of the current ddPCR assays. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ddPCR offers a highly sensitive and purely quantitative method to measure low MAF with minimal sample input requirements, which highlights the potential use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring. As one possible MRD monitoring approach, NGS panel-based assays may identify all variants at baseline screening, followed by ddPCR as a complementary solution for MRD monitoring of single variants. Currently, there are ongoing efforts in examining longitudinal ctDNA variant changes in CRC patients receiving treatment to further confirm which variants could be used for MRD monitoring in CRC. Citation Format: Dennis O9Rourke, Danyi Wang, Juergen Scheuenpflug, Zheng Feng. Validation of low fraction allelic variants in plasma samples from patients with late stage colorectal cancer using droplet digital PCR: Potential clinical utility for minimal residual disease monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 542.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
542:利用微滴数字PCR验证晚期结直肠癌患者血浆样本中的低分数等位基因变异:用于微小残留疾病监测的潜在临床应用
在循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)中可靠地检测低突变等位基因分数(MAF)提供了重要的临床信息。重要的是,实体肿瘤的微小残留病(MRD)检测已被认为是反应和早期复发预测的有力指标。考虑到全外显子组测序(WES)或靶向NGS技术的高样品输入要求和分析复杂性,开发一种具有成本效益的低DNA输入量MAF绝对定量测量方法至关重要。在之前的一项研究中,使用Guardant Health GuardantOMNI NGS面板(ctDNA)和WES(肿瘤)分析了25例晚期结直肠癌样本,发现了血浆ctDNA和起源组织中存在的临床相关基因变异。我们进一步研究了使用液滴数字PCR (ddPCR)测量仅存在于ctDNA中的变异的潜力;特别是那些低MAF的,可以应用于MRD监测。方法:我们开发了针对13种变异的ddPCR检测方法,这些变异在25例晚期CRC样本中的5例的ctDNA中检测到,而不是在组织中检测到。先前报道的变异的MAF范围从64.0% (FBXW7 p.R505C)到1.2% (TP53 R273H)。在新研究的变异中,范围为2.2% (EPHA7 I146T)至0.4% (PDGFRA1 pL31F和RB1 p.E440K)。其他变异包括KRAS G12D (30.8%), PIK3CA p.C420R (29.2%), TP53 p.R273H(1.2%)和ERBB4 p.I736T(1.1%)。设计阳性对照cDNA并将其加入健康血浆中,以确定野生型的基线水平和每种检测的灵敏度。然后测量患者的ctDNA。结果:来自ddPCR数据和GuardantOMNI面板的MAF在所有数据点(n=13)显示高度一致性(r2 = 0.9986)。当只考虑MAF小于5%的变异时(n=9;TP53 R273H、TSC2、EP300、PPP2R1A、LIG4、EPHA7、ERBB4、PDGFRA1、RB1)的一致性仍然很高,r2 = 0.9532,说明两种平台的准确性和敏感性。所有的ddPCR结果都是在最多5ng输入DNA的情况下获得的,在大多数情况下低至1ng。然而,在1% MAF以下,一致性开始减弱(r2=0.4024),可能是由于当前ddPCR检测的局限性。结论:我们证明了ddPCR提供了一种高灵敏度和纯定量的方法,以最小的样品输入要求来测量低MAF,这突出了ddPCR在MRD监测中的潜在应用。作为一种可能的MRD监测方法,基于NGS面板的分析可以在基线筛选时识别所有变异,然后使用ddPCR作为单一变异MRD监测的补充解决方案。目前,正在研究接受治疗的CRC患者的纵向ctDNA变异变化,以进一步确认哪些变异可用于CRC的MRD监测。引文格式:Dennis O9Rourke, Danyi Wang, Juergen Scheuenpflug, Zheng Feng。使用微滴数字PCR验证晚期结直肠癌患者血浆样本中的低分数等位基因变异:用于最小残留疾病监测的潜在临床应用[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):542。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract 470: Evaluation of two receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) clones by immunohistochemistry Abstract 586: Expression of CD68 on CKpos/CD45poscirculating cells in breast cancer patients: An additional hint supporting the fusion hybrid theory Abstract 401: Comparison of molecular response calculations for prediction of patient outcome Abstract LB061: On-target peripheral and tumor immune microenvironment modulation in patients treated with lacnotuzumab (anti-CSF1, MCS110) + spartalizumab Abstract 550: Cell-free DNA alterations in theAR/enhancer locus measured before AR signaling inhibition portend poor overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1