Runoff Prediction of Bharathapuzha River Basin using Artificial Neural Network and SWAT Model

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of Agricultural Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52151/jae2022594.1791
{"title":"Runoff Prediction of Bharathapuzha River Basin using Artificial Neural Network and SWAT Model","authors":"","doi":"10.52151/jae2022594.1791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attempt was made to model the non-linear system of rainfall-runoff process from Bharathapuzha River basin using an information processing paradigm, Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The results were compared with the outputs of the semi-distributed, physically-based SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. The ANN modelling was done using back propagation learning algorithm, tan sigmoid transfer function, and model input strategy having rainfall and other climatic variables as input by assigning number of layers as 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40. Different models were evaluated with respect to coefficient of correlation (r), coefficient of determination (R2 ), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the ANN models, ANN-BP-A-5 (six input variables, 5 hidden layers) performed best, followed by ANN-BP-A40 (six input variables, 40 hidden layers). Comparison of ANN predicted runoff of the best models (ANN-BP-A-5 and ANNBP-A40) with the SWAT predicted runoff revealed that the simulated runoff using SWAT was more correlated to observed runoff than ANN predicted runoff. The ANN models underestimated the flow during the rainy season, and gave an overestimation during the summer season. However, the R2 values of 0.666 and 0.649 obtained for ANN-BP-A-5 and ANN-BP-A40, respectively, indicated that the performances of ANN models were satisfactory and ANN model can also be used for runoff prediction in data scarce areas.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2022594.1791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An attempt was made to model the non-linear system of rainfall-runoff process from Bharathapuzha River basin using an information processing paradigm, Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The results were compared with the outputs of the semi-distributed, physically-based SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. The ANN modelling was done using back propagation learning algorithm, tan sigmoid transfer function, and model input strategy having rainfall and other climatic variables as input by assigning number of layers as 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40. Different models were evaluated with respect to coefficient of correlation (r), coefficient of determination (R2 ), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the ANN models, ANN-BP-A-5 (six input variables, 5 hidden layers) performed best, followed by ANN-BP-A40 (six input variables, 40 hidden layers). Comparison of ANN predicted runoff of the best models (ANN-BP-A-5 and ANNBP-A40) with the SWAT predicted runoff revealed that the simulated runoff using SWAT was more correlated to observed runoff than ANN predicted runoff. The ANN models underestimated the flow during the rainy season, and gave an overestimation during the summer season. However, the R2 values of 0.666 and 0.649 obtained for ANN-BP-A-5 and ANN-BP-A40, respectively, indicated that the performances of ANN models were satisfactory and ANN model can also be used for runoff prediction in data scarce areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工神经网络和SWAT模型的巴拉塔普扎河流域径流预测
利用人工神经网络(ANN)对巴拉塔普扎河流域降雨径流过程的非线性系统进行了建模。将结果与半分布式、基于物理的SWAT(水土评估工具)模型的输出结果进行比较。人工神经网络建模使用反向传播学习算法,tan s型传递函数和模型输入策略,通过将层数分配为5、10、15、20、25、30和40,将降雨量和其他气候变量作为输入。通过相关系数(r)、决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)对不同模型进行评价。其中,ANN- bp - a -5(6个输入变量,5个隐藏层)表现最好,其次是ANN- bp - a40(6个输入变量,40个隐藏层)。将最佳模型ANN- bp - a -5和ANNBP-A40与SWAT预测的径流量进行比较,发现SWAT模拟的径流量与观测径流量的相关性高于ANN预测的径流量。人工神经网络模型低估了雨季的流量,高估了夏季的流量。然而,ANN- bp - a -5和ANN- bp - a40的R2分别为0.666和0.649,表明ANN模型的性能令人满意,ANN模型也可以用于数据稀缺地区的径流预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two different artificial neural network models for prediction of soil penetration resistance Apple recognition and picking sequence planning for harvesting robot in the complex environment Monitoring and multi-scenario simulation of agricultural land changes using Landsat imageries and FLUS model on coastal Alanya Variable-rate spray system for unmanned aerial applications using lag compensation algorithm and pulse width modulation spray technology Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D vineyard yield prediction system using artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1