Nasal Dilators (Breathe Right Strips and NoZovent) for Snoring and OSA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2016-12-13 DOI:10.1155/2016/4841310
M. Camacho, O. Malu, Y. Kram, G. Nigam, M. Riaz, Sungjin A. Song, Anthony M. Tolisano, C. Kushida
{"title":"Nasal Dilators (Breathe Right Strips and NoZovent) for Snoring and OSA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"M. Camacho, O. Malu, Y. Kram, G. Nigam, M. Riaz, Sungjin A. Song, Anthony M. Tolisano, C. Kushida","doi":"10.1155/2016/4841310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To systematically review the international literature for studies evaluating internal (NoZovent) and external (Breathe Right Strips) nasal dilators as treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study Design. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods. Four databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, were searched through September 29, 2016. Results. One-hundred twelve studies were screened, fifty-eight studies were reviewed, and fourteen studies met criteria. In 147 patients, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reported, and there was an improvement from a mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) of 28.7 ± 24.0 to 27.4 ± 23.3 events/hr, p value 0.64. There was no significant change in AHI, lowest oxygen saturation, or snoring index in OSA patients when using nasal dilators. However, a subanalysis demonstrated a slight reduction in apnea index (AI) with internal nasal dilators (decrease by 4.87 events/hr) versus minimal change for external nasal dilators (increase by 0.64 events/hr). Conclusion. Although nasal dilators have demonstrated improved nasal breathing, they have not shown improvement in obstructive sleep apnea outcomes, with the exception of mild improvement in apnea index when internal nasal dilators were used.","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4841310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Objective. To systematically review the international literature for studies evaluating internal (NoZovent) and external (Breathe Right Strips) nasal dilators as treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study Design. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods. Four databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, were searched through September 29, 2016. Results. One-hundred twelve studies were screened, fifty-eight studies were reviewed, and fourteen studies met criteria. In 147 patients, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reported, and there was an improvement from a mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) of 28.7 ± 24.0 to 27.4 ± 23.3 events/hr, p value 0.64. There was no significant change in AHI, lowest oxygen saturation, or snoring index in OSA patients when using nasal dilators. However, a subanalysis demonstrated a slight reduction in apnea index (AI) with internal nasal dilators (decrease by 4.87 events/hr) versus minimal change for external nasal dilators (increase by 0.64 events/hr). Conclusion. Although nasal dilators have demonstrated improved nasal breathing, they have not shown improvement in obstructive sleep apnea outcomes, with the exception of mild improvement in apnea index when internal nasal dilators were used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的鼻扩张器(正确呼吸条和NoZovent):系统回顾和荟萃分析
目标。系统回顾国际文献,评价内扩器(NoZovent)和外扩器(Breathe Right Strips)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的疗效。研究设计。采用荟萃分析的系统评价。方法。截至2016年9月29日,检索了PubMed/MEDLINE等四个数据库。结果。112项研究被筛选,58项研究被回顾,14项研究符合标准。147例患者报告了呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI),平均±标准差(M±SD)为28.7±24.0至27.4±23.3事件/小时,p值为0.64。使用鼻腔扩张器后,OSA患者的AHI、最低血氧饱和度或打鼾指数均无显著变化。然而,一项亚分析显示,使用内鼻扩张器可以轻微降低呼吸暂停指数(AI)(降低4.87次/小时),而使用外鼻扩张器则变化很小(增加0.64次/小时)。结论。虽然鼻扩张器可以改善鼻腔呼吸,但除了使用内鼻扩张器可以轻微改善呼吸暂停指数外,没有显示出对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停结果的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Practice Variations in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Children. Dual-Task Performance in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Establishing the Safety and Efficacy of Bedaquiline-Containing Regimen for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Adherence to the ISHLT Protocol for the Referral of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis to the Transplantation Center among of Czech Centers for Interstitial Lung Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1