Effect of Deltoid Tuberosity Index on the Outcome of Proximal Humeral Fracture Treated with a Locking Plate

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2021.284963.1292
Reza Tavakoli-Darestani, A. Manafi, Hamidreza Baranzehi, Mohammad Mahdi Omidian, Hassan Barati, Mojtaba Baroutkoub, Farzad Amouzadeh Omrani, S. Sayadi, A. Mirbolook
{"title":"Effect of Deltoid Tuberosity Index on the Outcome of Proximal Humeral Fracture Treated with a Locking Plate","authors":"Reza Tavakoli-Darestani, A. Manafi, Hamidreza Baranzehi, Mohammad Mahdi Omidian, Hassan Barati, Mojtaba Baroutkoub, Farzad Amouzadeh Omrani, S. Sayadi, A. Mirbolook","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.284963.1292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the elderly, proximal humerus fractures are not unusual. The treatment of these injuries are often complicated.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deltoid tuberosity index on the outcome of proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate.Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus had open-reduction and internal fixation using a locking plate. The patients were divided into two main groups (low density group) DTI 1.4 (normal density group) and at the end of the study, treatment and failure were assessed in the two groups.Results: In this study, 100 patients with proximal humeral fracture who were candidates for locking plating surgery were evaluated. The mean of DTI in all patients was 1.48 with a minimum of 1.10 and a maximum of 2.20. Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, with increasing age, the constant score decreased in the studied patients, which was statistically significant (r=-0.216, p-value = 0.031). Also, in patients with DTI less than 1.4 and more than 1.4, the Constant score was 73.02 and 77.88, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p-value=0.054). There was a statistically significant relationship between Constant Score, DTI and patients' gender (p-value≤0.05). While there was no statistically significant relationship between fracture type and constant score. Pearson correlation coefficient between DTI and age of patients was -0.30, which decreased with increasing age of patients. This was statistically significant (r=-0.30, p-value=0.003).Conclusion: The results of this study show that the deltoid tuberosity index can be effective on proximal humoral fracture surgery treated with locking plating.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"55 1","pages":"222-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.284963.1292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the elderly, proximal humerus fractures are not unusual. The treatment of these injuries are often complicated.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deltoid tuberosity index on the outcome of proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate.Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus had open-reduction and internal fixation using a locking plate. The patients were divided into two main groups (low density group) DTI 1.4 (normal density group) and at the end of the study, treatment and failure were assessed in the two groups.Results: In this study, 100 patients with proximal humeral fracture who were candidates for locking plating surgery were evaluated. The mean of DTI in all patients was 1.48 with a minimum of 1.10 and a maximum of 2.20. Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, with increasing age, the constant score decreased in the studied patients, which was statistically significant (r=-0.216, p-value = 0.031). Also, in patients with DTI less than 1.4 and more than 1.4, the Constant score was 73.02 and 77.88, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p-value=0.054). There was a statistically significant relationship between Constant Score, DTI and patients' gender (p-value≤0.05). While there was no statistically significant relationship between fracture type and constant score. Pearson correlation coefficient between DTI and age of patients was -0.30, which decreased with increasing age of patients. This was statistically significant (r=-0.30, p-value=0.003).Conclusion: The results of this study show that the deltoid tuberosity index can be effective on proximal humoral fracture surgery treated with locking plating.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三角结节指数对锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效的影响
背景:在老年人中,肱骨近端骨折并不罕见。这些损伤的治疗通常很复杂。目的:本研究旨在评估三角结节指数对肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板治疗结果的影响。方法:对100例肱骨近端移位性骨折患者进行切开复位锁定钢板内固定。将患者分为两主要组(低密度组)和DTI 1.4(正常密度组),在研究结束时评估两组的治疗和失败情况。结果:在本研究中,对100例肱骨近端骨折患者进行了锁定钢板手术的评估。所有患者的DTI平均值为1.48,最小为1.10,最大为2.20。Pearson相关系数显示,随着年龄的增加,研究患者的不变评分下降,差异有统计学意义(r=-0.216, p值= 0.031)。DTI小于1.4和大于1.4的患者,Constant得分分别为73.02和77.88。差异无统计学意义(p值=0.054)。Constant Score、DTI与患者性别有统计学意义(p值≤0.05)。而骨折类型与常数评分之间无统计学意义。DTI与患者年龄的Pearson相关系数为-0.30,随患者年龄的增加而降低。这具有统计学意义(r=-0.30, p值=0.003)。结论:三角结节指数是肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板治疗的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1