Applicability of Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation After The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020

M. Panjaitan
{"title":"Applicability of Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation After The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020","authors":"M. Panjaitan","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.36222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the issuance of the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, the DPR and the government, as lawmakers, are obliged to comply with it. Because the decision of the Constitutional Court is a legal decision that all parties must obey without exception, it is necessary to obtain an assessment, first, of how the law applies. No. 11 of 2020 after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Second, how are the DPR and the government’s efforts to respond to changes in Law no. 11 of 2020 after Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020? The research method used is normative legal research, namely library research, whose sources use secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020, that Law No. 11 of 2020 is still valid. However, the House of Representative/DPR and the Government are given time to fix it within a period of two years. If corrections are not made within this time period, the law will become permanently invalid. In fulfilling this, first amendments were made to Law Number 12 of 2011, so that it became Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation. The amendment has included the omnibus method as the basis for forming laws and regulations. Based on Law Number 13 of 2022, the DPR and the Government made improvements to Law Number 11 of 2020. The results of the study show that by the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which grants the applicant’s request conditionally, the DPR and the government are obliged to amend Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation since the decision of the Constitutional Court aquo was read. If, within 2 (two) years, the DPR and the government cannot make improvements to Law No. 11 of 2020, the law becomes permanently unconstitutional. On that basis, law. No. 11 of 2020 after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is still valid unless the DPR and the government do not make improvements to Law No. 11 of 2020 within 2 (two) years, then the law becomes permanently invalid. Therefore, in response to the Constitutional Court’s decision, the DPR and the government are currently trying to amend Law no. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation. In this change, the omnibus law method is explicitly mentioned as one of the methods for forming laws.","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.36222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the issuance of the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, the DPR and the government, as lawmakers, are obliged to comply with it. Because the decision of the Constitutional Court is a legal decision that all parties must obey without exception, it is necessary to obtain an assessment, first, of how the law applies. No. 11 of 2020 after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Second, how are the DPR and the government’s efforts to respond to changes in Law no. 11 of 2020 after Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020? The research method used is normative legal research, namely library research, whose sources use secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020, that Law No. 11 of 2020 is still valid. However, the House of Representative/DPR and the Government are given time to fix it within a period of two years. If corrections are not made within this time period, the law will become permanently invalid. In fulfilling this, first amendments were made to Law Number 12 of 2011, so that it became Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation. The amendment has included the omnibus method as the basis for forming laws and regulations. Based on Law Number 13 of 2022, the DPR and the Government made improvements to Law Number 11 of 2020. The results of the study show that by the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which grants the applicant’s request conditionally, the DPR and the government are obliged to amend Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation since the decision of the Constitutional Court aquo was read. If, within 2 (two) years, the DPR and the government cannot make improvements to Law No. 11 of 2020, the law becomes permanently unconstitutional. On that basis, law. No. 11 of 2020 after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is still valid unless the DPR and the government do not make improvements to Law No. 11 of 2020 within 2 (two) years, then the law becomes permanently invalid. Therefore, in response to the Constitutional Court’s decision, the DPR and the government are currently trying to amend Law no. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation. In this change, the omnibus law method is explicitly mentioned as one of the methods for forming laws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法法院第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号判决后关于创造就业机会的2020年第11号法律的适用性
宪法裁判所第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号判决一经公布,作为国会议员的民主劳动党和政府有义务遵守。因为宪法法院的判决是所有当事人都必须遵守的法律判决,所以首先有必要对法律的适用方式进行评估。根据第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号宪法法院的决定,2020年第11号。第二,人民民主共和国和政府如何努力应对第19号法律的变化?在宪法法院第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号决定之后的2020年11月?使用的研究方法是规范的法律研究,即图书馆研究,其来源使用二手数据的形式,第一,第二和第三法律材料。对宪法法院第91/PUU-XVII/2020号判决的研究结果表明,2020年第11号法仍然有效。但是,将给予众议院/人民院和政府在两年内解决该问题的时间。逾期不改正的,法律永久失效。为此,对2011年第12号法进行了第一次修订,使其成为关于2011年第12号法(关于立法形成)的第二次修正案的2022年第13号法。修正案将综合法作为法律法规形成的基础。根据2022年第13号法律,人民民主共和国和政府对2020年第11号法律进行了改进。研究结果表明,根据第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号宪法法院的决定(该决定有条件地批准了申请人的请求),人民民主共和国和政府有义务修改第366号法律。自宪法法院的决定宣读以来,关于创造就业的2020年第11号决议。如果在两年内,DPR和政府不能对2020年第11号法律做出改进,该法律将永久违宪。在此基础上,法律。在第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号宪法法院作出决定后,2020年第11号法律仍然有效,除非DPR和政府在两(2)年内不对2020年第11号法律进行改进,否则该法律将永久无效。2011年第12号关于建立立法。在这一变化中,综合法法被明确地提及为法的形成方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Criminal Law to Determine Persons of Environmental Pollution and/or Destruction in Court Covid-19 Pandemic as Force Majeure Unable to Fulfill Obligation in Financing Agreement Social Engineering to Overcome Conflict Between People’s Markets and Supermarkets in Kulon Progo Regency (Review of Regional Regulation No. 16 of 2021) Reposition of the Promulgation for Indonesian Legislation Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1