Performance comparison of hip fracture pathways in two capital cities: Associations with level and change of integration

U. Häkkinen, T. Hagen, T. Moger
{"title":"Performance comparison of hip fracture pathways in two capital cities: Associations with level and change of integration","authors":"U. Häkkinen, T. Hagen, T. Moger","doi":"10.5617/NJHE.4836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finland and Norway have health care systems that have a varying degree of vertical integration. In Finland the financial responsibility for all patient treatment is placed at the municipal level, while in Norway the responsibility for patients is divided between the municipalities (primary and long-term care) and state-owned hospitals. From 2012, the Norwegian system became more vertically integrated following the introduction of the Coordination Reform. The aim of the paper is to analyse the associations between different modes of integration and performance indicators. The data included operated hip fracture patients from the years 2009–2014 residing in the cities of Oslo and Helsinki. Data from routinely collected national registers, also including data from primary health and long-term-care services, were linked. Performance indicators were compared at baseline (before the Coordination Reform, i.e., 2009–2011), and trends were described and analysed by difference-in-difference methods. The baseline study indicated that hip fracture patients in Oslo, compared with those in Helsinki, had longer stays in acute hospitals. They used less institutional care outside of hospitals as well as more GP services and fewer other outpatient services. Mortality was lower, and the probability of being discharged to home within 90 days from the index day was higher. After the Coordination Reform, the length of stay in hospital was shorter and the length of the first institutional episode in Oslo was longer than before the Reform, demonstrating that the shorter hospital stays were more than compensated for by longer stays in long-term-care institutions. The number of patients institutionalised 90 days from the index day increased and the number of patients discharged to home within 90 days from the index day decreased in Oslo after the Reform while the opposite trends were observed in Helsinki. After the Reform, the performance differences between the two regions had decreased. Published: Online December 2018. In print January 2019. ","PeriodicalId":30931,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/NJHE.4836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Finland and Norway have health care systems that have a varying degree of vertical integration. In Finland the financial responsibility for all patient treatment is placed at the municipal level, while in Norway the responsibility for patients is divided between the municipalities (primary and long-term care) and state-owned hospitals. From 2012, the Norwegian system became more vertically integrated following the introduction of the Coordination Reform. The aim of the paper is to analyse the associations between different modes of integration and performance indicators. The data included operated hip fracture patients from the years 2009–2014 residing in the cities of Oslo and Helsinki. Data from routinely collected national registers, also including data from primary health and long-term-care services, were linked. Performance indicators were compared at baseline (before the Coordination Reform, i.e., 2009–2011), and trends were described and analysed by difference-in-difference methods. The baseline study indicated that hip fracture patients in Oslo, compared with those in Helsinki, had longer stays in acute hospitals. They used less institutional care outside of hospitals as well as more GP services and fewer other outpatient services. Mortality was lower, and the probability of being discharged to home within 90 days from the index day was higher. After the Coordination Reform, the length of stay in hospital was shorter and the length of the first institutional episode in Oslo was longer than before the Reform, demonstrating that the shorter hospital stays were more than compensated for by longer stays in long-term-care institutions. The number of patients institutionalised 90 days from the index day increased and the number of patients discharged to home within 90 days from the index day decreased in Oslo after the Reform while the opposite trends were observed in Helsinki. After the Reform, the performance differences between the two regions had decreased. Published: Online December 2018. In print January 2019. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个首都城市髋部骨折路径的性能比较:与整合水平和变化的关系
芬兰和挪威的医疗保健系统具有不同程度的垂直整合。在芬兰,所有病人治疗的财政责任由市一级承担,而在挪威,对病人的责任由市(初级和长期护理)和国有医院分担。从2012年开始,随着协调改革的引入,挪威的体系更加垂直一体化。本文的目的是分析不同整合模式与绩效指标之间的关系。数据包括2009年至2014年居住在奥斯陆和赫尔辛基的髋部骨折手术患者。定期收集的国家登记册的数据,也包括初级保健和长期保健服务的数据,进行了联系。在基线(协调改革之前,即2009-2011年)比较绩效指标,并采用差异中差异方法描述和分析趋势。基线研究表明,与赫尔辛基的患者相比,奥斯陆的髋部骨折患者在急症医院的住院时间更长。他们较少使用医院以外的机构护理,以及更多的全科医生服务和更少的其他门诊服务。死亡率较低,自指标日起90天内出院的概率较高。在协调改革之后,住院时间缩短了,奥斯陆第一次机构治疗的时间比改革之前更长,这表明较短的住院时间被较长的长期护理机构住院时间所弥补。改革后,奥斯陆自指标日起90天内住院的患者人数增加,自指标日起90天内出院回家的患者人数减少,而赫尔辛基的趋势正好相反。改革开放后,两地的绩效差异有所缩小。出版日期:2018年12月。2019年1月出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊最新文献
GP Recruitment and retention in the Nordic countries The role of occupational health care in ambulatory health care in Finland Work pressure and job dissatisfaction: Challenges in Danish general practice Using matching methods to account for selection bias in Norway’s Primary Care Teams (PCT) pilot Quality of Life in the Swedish General Population During COVID-19 - Based on pre- and post-pandemic outbreak measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1