Comparison of the depths of focus with the naked eye and with three types of presbyopic contact lens correction

MSc Athena Plakitsi, PhD W. Neil Charman
{"title":"Comparison of the depths of focus with the naked eye and with three types of presbyopic contact lens correction","authors":"MSc Athena Plakitsi,&nbsp;PhD W. Neil Charman","doi":"10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80023-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Experiments are described in which monocular, high-contrast, letter acuity was measured as a function of target vergence (effective distance) for six simulated presbyopic subjects, who were placed under cycloplegia with a 4mm diameter artificial pupil. Measurements were made with the naked eye or single-vision spectacle lens corrected eye, and with three types of simultaneous-vision (simultaneous image) ‡ presbyopic contact lens correction: a centre-near biofocal; a centre-distance varifocal or progressive power lens; and a centre-mear varifocal. Results show that all designs usefully improve the range of distances over which an adequate standard of vision is achieved, the depth of focus typically being increased by about 1–2 dioptres, depending upon the criterion used to define depth of focus. Peak visual acuity at optimal focus is, however, slightly worse with the presbyopic contact lens corrections than with the naked or spectacle-lens corrected eye. Intersubject differences suggest that individual lens characteristics, the aberrations of the individual eye and lens centration may all play a role in determining the optical effectiveness of any particular design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0141-7037(95)80023-9","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The British Contact Lens Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141703795800239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Experiments are described in which monocular, high-contrast, letter acuity was measured as a function of target vergence (effective distance) for six simulated presbyopic subjects, who were placed under cycloplegia with a 4mm diameter artificial pupil. Measurements were made with the naked eye or single-vision spectacle lens corrected eye, and with three types of simultaneous-vision (simultaneous image) ‡ presbyopic contact lens correction: a centre-near biofocal; a centre-distance varifocal or progressive power lens; and a centre-mear varifocal. Results show that all designs usefully improve the range of distances over which an adequate standard of vision is achieved, the depth of focus typically being increased by about 1–2 dioptres, depending upon the criterion used to define depth of focus. Peak visual acuity at optimal focus is, however, slightly worse with the presbyopic contact lens corrections than with the naked or spectacle-lens corrected eye. Intersubject differences suggest that individual lens characteristics, the aberrations of the individual eye and lens centration may all play a role in determining the optical effectiveness of any particular design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种老花眼隐形眼镜与裸眼对焦深度的比较
实验描述了单眼,高对比度,字母视敏度作为目标聚光(有效距离)的函数测量了六个模拟老花眼受试者,他们被放置在一个直径4mm的人工瞳孔下。使用裸眼或单视力镜片矫正眼进行测量,并使用三种类型的同时视觉(同时图像):老花眼隐形眼镜矫正:中心附近的生物焦点;变焦透镜中心距离的变焦透镜或渐进放大镜;还有一个中音变奏。结果表明,所有的设计都有效地提高了达到适当视力标准的距离范围,焦点深度通常增加了大约1-2屈光度,这取决于用于定义焦点深度的标准。然而,与裸眼或眼镜矫正眼相比,老花眼隐形眼镜矫正眼在最佳焦距下的峰值视力略差。主体间的差异表明,单个透镜的特性、个体眼睛的像差和透镜集中度都可能在决定任何特定设计的光学效果方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Announcement Editorial Editorial Board Editorial Notices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1