The Imperialism of Democracy and Human Rights vs the Democracy and Human Rights of Imperialism

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Critical Thought Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21598282.2022.2065719
R. Desai
{"title":"The Imperialism of Democracy and Human Rights vs the Democracy and Human Rights of Imperialism","authors":"R. Desai","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2022.2065719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Western discourse towards China had been hardening since it became clear to US leaders that their assumption that increasing trade and engagement with China would lead it to become a pale imitation of Western neoliberal financialised capitalisms was coming unravelled and China continued to adhere to its socialist commitments. In waging the US’s New Cold War on China with equal if not greater vigour than Trump, Biden merely replaced Trump’s “America First” stance with the traditionally hypocritical stance of imperialism that always pretends to do good for the world it seeks to dominate, oppress, exploit and otherwise destroy. The latest version of this discourse is about promoting human rights and democracy. At a time when US and Western democracies are being assailed by a toxic combination of inequality, poverty, distrust, social division and political disaffection and polarisation, at a time when US imperialism’s distinctly anti-democratic edge is becoming ever more evident, this stance is only facing mounting contradictions. The present article explores them.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"33 1","pages":"169 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2065719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Western discourse towards China had been hardening since it became clear to US leaders that their assumption that increasing trade and engagement with China would lead it to become a pale imitation of Western neoliberal financialised capitalisms was coming unravelled and China continued to adhere to its socialist commitments. In waging the US’s New Cold War on China with equal if not greater vigour than Trump, Biden merely replaced Trump’s “America First” stance with the traditionally hypocritical stance of imperialism that always pretends to do good for the world it seeks to dominate, oppress, exploit and otherwise destroy. The latest version of this discourse is about promoting human rights and democracy. At a time when US and Western democracies are being assailed by a toxic combination of inequality, poverty, distrust, social division and political disaffection and polarisation, at a time when US imperialism’s distinctly anti-democratic edge is becoming ever more evident, this stance is only facing mounting contradictions. The present article explores them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主与人权的帝国主义vs帝国主义的民主与人权
西方对中国的言论已经变得强硬,因为美国领导人清楚地认识到,他们的假设,即增加与中国的贸易和接触将导致中国成为西方新自由主义金融资本主义的苍白模仿,正在瓦解,中国继续坚持其社会主义承诺。拜登以与特朗普不相上下的力度对中国发动新冷战,只不过是用帝国主义传统上虚伪的立场取代了特朗普的“美国优先”立场,这种立场总是假装为世界做好事,寻求统治、压迫、剥削和毁灭。这一话语的最新版本是关于促进人权和民主。当美国和西方民主国家受到不平等、贫困、不信任、社会分裂、政治不满和两极分化的有毒组合的攻击时,当美帝国主义明显的反民主优势变得越来越明显时,这种立场只会面临越来越多的矛盾。本文将对此进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
The Colors of Content Moderation: A Portfolio of Brazilian Resistances to Coloniality on Instagram The Origin, Current Situation and Trends of Racism in the West The Law of Uneven Development and the Transition to a New World System: On the Spatial Political Economy of Socialism From “Authentic” to Actual Marxist Educational Theory: Advancing Revolutionary Pedagogies Medicine, Dissent and the “Chloroquinization” of Truth: Brazil and Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1