Translation and Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Version of Patient Trust in Midwifery Care Scale

S. Abdolahian, G. Ozgoli, A. Ebadi, N. Kariman
{"title":"Translation and Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Version of Patient Trust in Midwifery Care Scale","authors":"S. Abdolahian, G. Ozgoli, A. Ebadi, N. Kariman","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2019.35168.1894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients’ trust in their physicians can affect therapeutic outcomes. Measurement of patient’s trust levels is a helpful approach for policymakers in healthcare systems. Aim: The present study was targeted toward the translation and psychometric assessment of patients’ trust in midwifery care questionnaire. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 210 female patients referring to the midwifery offices of Tehran, Iran, in 2017. After the translation and back translation of the original version of patient’s trust questionnaire, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to measure the structural validity and reliability (through Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation) of the instrument. Results: Measurement of the questionnaire validity by exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors with the eigenvalues of > 1. The three extracted factors accounted for 73.24% of total variance. The goodness of fit indices revealed that the fitness of the three-factor model was at a desirable level, rendering a χ2/degree of freedom of 2.34, comparative fit index of 0.96, and root mean square error of approximation of 0.07. The reliability of the scale was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.81 and intra-cluster correlation of 0.96. Implications for Practice: The patients’ trust questionnaire, measuring the extent of patient’s trust in midwifery offices in Tehran, is a proper tool, enjoying appropriate validity and reliability. The results of the study also showed that the Persian version of the tool can be used to measure the trust rate of the patients referring to the midwifery offices in Iran.","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2019.35168.1894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Patients’ trust in their physicians can affect therapeutic outcomes. Measurement of patient’s trust levels is a helpful approach for policymakers in healthcare systems. Aim: The present study was targeted toward the translation and psychometric assessment of patients’ trust in midwifery care questionnaire. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 210 female patients referring to the midwifery offices of Tehran, Iran, in 2017. After the translation and back translation of the original version of patient’s trust questionnaire, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to measure the structural validity and reliability (through Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation) of the instrument. Results: Measurement of the questionnaire validity by exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors with the eigenvalues of > 1. The three extracted factors accounted for 73.24% of total variance. The goodness of fit indices revealed that the fitness of the three-factor model was at a desirable level, rendering a χ2/degree of freedom of 2.34, comparative fit index of 0.96, and root mean square error of approximation of 0.07. The reliability of the scale was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.81 and intra-cluster correlation of 0.96. Implications for Practice: The patients’ trust questionnaire, measuring the extent of patient’s trust in midwifery offices in Tehran, is a proper tool, enjoying appropriate validity and reliability. The results of the study also showed that the Persian version of the tool can be used to measure the trust rate of the patients referring to the midwifery offices in Iran.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产护理量表波斯语版患者信任的翻译与心理测量学评估
背景:患者对医生的信任可以影响治疗结果。测量患者的信任水平是一个有用的方法,为决策者在医疗保健系统。目的:本研究针对助产护理问卷中患者信任的翻译和心理测量学评估进行研究。方法:对2017年在伊朗德黑兰接生办就诊的210名女性患者进行横断面研究。在对原版患者信任问卷进行翻译和回译后,进行探索性和验证性因素分析,通过Cronbach’s alpha系数和类内相关性来衡量该工具的结构效度和信度。结果:通过探索性因子分析对问卷效度进行测量,发现三个因子的特征值均为bbbb1。三个提取因子占总方差的73.24%。拟合优度指标显示,三因素模型的拟合程度处于理想水平,χ2/自由度为2.34,比较拟合指数为0.96,近似均方根误差为0.07。量表的信度经Cronbach's alpha系数为0.81,簇内相关系数为0.96证实。实践意义:患者信任问卷,衡量病人的信任程度在助产办公室在德黑兰,是一个适当的工具,具有适当的效度和信度。研究结果还表明,该工具的波斯语版本可以用来衡量伊朗助产士办公室的患者信任度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Care Journal
Evidence Based Care Journal Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Health System: A Systematic Review Comparison of the effect of abdominal massage and Hugo point acupressure on infantile colic symptoms1 Fathers Involvement with Developmental care of their Preterm Newborns and its Impact on the Bonding and Self-Efficacy: a nonrandomized clinical trial The effect of spiritual intelligence training on the hope and self-transcendence in mothers of premature neonates Comparison between Emergency Severity Index plus Capnometer and Emergency Severity Index in the dyspneic patients with Chronic Heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1