Applying, updating and comparing bankruptcy forecasting models. The case of Greece

N. Daskalakis, Nikolaos Aggelakis, John Filos
{"title":"Applying, updating and comparing bankruptcy forecasting models. The case of Greece","authors":"N. Daskalakis, Nikolaos Aggelakis, John Filos","doi":"10.24818/jamis.2022.03002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Question: This study examines whether bankruptcy prediction models work well during recessionary periods, on an advanced economy, and how their results can be improved, via a methodological approach to change the coefficients of their variables. Motivation: This is the first study to follow a methodological approach of a simultaneous comparison-update-comparison task, during a recessionary period, for an advanced economy. Idea: The paper explores, updates and compares the effectiveness of five of the most common bankruptcy prediction models on the listed companies of an advanced economy (Greece), covering the recessionary period of 2010-2019. Data: The study sample consists of Greek companies, listed in the Athens Stock Exchange, covering the period 2010-2019, classified into viable and non-viable, based on specific criteria. The final sample consists of fifty-two (52) companies, listed in the Athens Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2019. Tools: We follow a two-stage analysis. First, we apply the original five bankruptcy prediction models of Altman (2000) and Grammatikos and Gloubos (1984), MDA and LPM models, Taffler (1983) and Dimitras et al. (1999) Next, we recalculate their coefficients, keeping the variables stable, and we again apply them to the same sample and compare them again. Findings: We find that the original models are significantly biased against viable companies, but predict with almost perfect accuracy non-viable companies’ bankruptcy. Once we update the variables’ coefficients, we get significantly improved results as regards correctly predicting viable companies, at the expense of slightly decreased, but still high, non-viable companies’ bankruptcy prediction rates. We suggest a similar methodology to be applied in other similar economies, to increase models’ accuracy. Contribution: The contribution of the paper is threefold. First, we show how we can develop highly accurate bankruptcy prediction models that can be applied in the economic environment of a developed economy. Second, we show that these models work well during recessionary periods as well, and can also be improved when their coefficients are changed. Third, we suggest a methodology of applying, comparing and updating such models, thus showing in detail this improvement process per model.","PeriodicalId":14716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2022.03002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Question: This study examines whether bankruptcy prediction models work well during recessionary periods, on an advanced economy, and how their results can be improved, via a methodological approach to change the coefficients of their variables. Motivation: This is the first study to follow a methodological approach of a simultaneous comparison-update-comparison task, during a recessionary period, for an advanced economy. Idea: The paper explores, updates and compares the effectiveness of five of the most common bankruptcy prediction models on the listed companies of an advanced economy (Greece), covering the recessionary period of 2010-2019. Data: The study sample consists of Greek companies, listed in the Athens Stock Exchange, covering the period 2010-2019, classified into viable and non-viable, based on specific criteria. The final sample consists of fifty-two (52) companies, listed in the Athens Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2019. Tools: We follow a two-stage analysis. First, we apply the original five bankruptcy prediction models of Altman (2000) and Grammatikos and Gloubos (1984), MDA and LPM models, Taffler (1983) and Dimitras et al. (1999) Next, we recalculate their coefficients, keeping the variables stable, and we again apply them to the same sample and compare them again. Findings: We find that the original models are significantly biased against viable companies, but predict with almost perfect accuracy non-viable companies’ bankruptcy. Once we update the variables’ coefficients, we get significantly improved results as regards correctly predicting viable companies, at the expense of slightly decreased, but still high, non-viable companies’ bankruptcy prediction rates. We suggest a similar methodology to be applied in other similar economies, to increase models’ accuracy. Contribution: The contribution of the paper is threefold. First, we show how we can develop highly accurate bankruptcy prediction models that can be applied in the economic environment of a developed economy. Second, we show that these models work well during recessionary periods as well, and can also be improved when their coefficients are changed. Third, we suggest a methodology of applying, comparing and updating such models, thus showing in detail this improvement process per model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破产预测模型的应用、更新和比较。希腊的情况
研究问题:本研究考察破产预测模型在经济衰退时期是否有效,在发达经济体,以及如何通过方法方法来改变其变量的系数来改进其结果。动机:这是第一个在发达经济体衰退期间采用同步比较-更新-比较任务的方法学方法的研究。思路:本文对一个发达经济体(希腊)2010-2019年经济衰退期间上市公司最常见的五种破产预测模型的有效性进行了探索、更新和比较。数据:研究样本由在雅典证券交易所上市的希腊公司组成,涵盖2010-2019年期间,根据具体标准分为可行和不可行的。最后的样本由52家公司组成,这些公司在2010年至2019年期间在雅典证券交易所上市。工具:我们遵循两阶段分析。首先,我们采用Altman(2000)、Grammatikos和Gloubos(1984)、MDA和LPM模型、Taffler(1983)和Dimitras等人(1999)的原五种破产预测模型,然后重新计算它们的系数,保持变量稳定,再次将它们应用于同一样本并再次进行比较。研究发现:原始模型对可生存企业存在显著偏差,但对不可生存企业的破产预测具有近乎完美的准确性。一旦我们更新了变量的系数,我们在正确预测可生存公司方面得到了显著提高的结果,代价是不可生存公司的破产预测率略有下降,但仍然很高。我们建议将类似的方法应用于其他类似的经济体,以提高模型的准确性。贡献:论文的贡献是三重的。首先,我们展示了如何开发高度准确的破产预测模型,该模型可以应用于发达经济体的经济环境。其次,我们表明这些模型在经济衰退时期也能很好地工作,并且当它们的系数改变时也可以得到改进。第三,我们提出了一种应用、比较和更新这些模型的方法,从而详细展示了每个模型的改进过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual capital: A key driver of financial performance in the Macedonian banking industry The role of IPSAS application in meeting voters yearnings Analyzing the causal relationship between tax avoidance and earnings management: Evidence from the STOXX Europe 600 Index The interconnectivity of ESG research within the realm of sustainability: A bibliometric analysis IFRS adoption and the value-relevance of financial statements figures in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1